Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
CLIF wrote on Aug 30, 2008 11:28 AM:
Smart wrote on Aug 28, 2008 9:39 AM:
One lie makes your entire point of view suspect.
The facts will hold up an opinion, a lie will make every else you say suspect.
I for one like the higher gas prices, it lets me laugh out loud at all the drivers out there in the big trucks with the big tires spending 200.00 a week on gas while driving back and forth to those high paying jobs we have too much of!
Jason wrote on Aug 27, 2008 9:36 PM:
These ten big media organizations are the main source of news for most Americans. Their corporate ties require us to continually scrutinize the quality of their news for bias. Disney owns ABC so we wonder how the board of Disney reacts to negative news about their board of directors friends such as Halliburton or Boeing. We see board members with connections to Ford, Kraft, and Kimberly-Clark who employ tens of thousands of Americans. Is it possible that the U.S. workforce receives only the corporate news private companies want them to hear? Do we collectively realize that working people in the U.S. have longer hours, lower pay and fewer benefits than their foreign counterparts? If these companies control the media, they control the dissemination of news turning the First Amendment on its head by protecting corporate interests over people.
Coos Bay Resident wrote on Aug 27, 2008 10:06 AM:
Tony wrote on Aug 27, 2008 9:12 AM:
Blaming a dem for high gas prices when this Country has been ruled by two oil men for the last 8 years?
I am speechless.
But thats better than clueless.
Clif wrote on Aug 27, 2008 5:56 AM:
Jason wrote on Aug 26, 2008 7:35 PM:
DeFazio knows the inside of this issue more than most of us. He's looking out for us.
Try to listen to progressive radio talk/news shows. Their only agenda is to teach us important, verified facts that are important to the middle class.
I'm ready for oil addiction rehab. Aren't you?
thr repubs had years wrote on Aug 26, 2008 5:28 PM:
- Why is it that it was only 2 months ago that Bush 43 thought it was immportant to lift the offshore ban enacted by his dad?
- Why didn't the Repubs think it was important before this summer?
- Why didn't the Repubs go ahead and sign the bill for drilling that was presented by the Dems? The answer is that the bill would've eliminated some of the tax breaks that have allowed Big Oil to reap the biggest profits in history. That doesn't speak to the importance of finding new sources of oil.
The only thing that can be read from that is that the Repubs think that Oil profits are more important than energy independence and national security.
Par for the course.






The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines