another taxpayers wrote on Sep 1, 2008 11:40 AM:
the problems with the termial are expected especally when the job is awarded to the lowest bidder. the siding rusting is probley from the arcitect specing a lower grade stainless wich probley save alot of money but will cost more money to fix then the cost saving of the lower grade stainless the arcitect should be held responsible if this is the case not the contractor who was following the spec book the board should have done there home work first and if they did not know then ask the only bad questions are the ones that are not asked
Ms. Baker wrote on Aug 31, 2008 10:52 PM:
The PA system at the new building is worthless. The security guard had to tell waiting passengers that the security line had opened because the announcement could not be heard. It appeared to be a task he was used to doing. I've flown Horizon four times in the last month, and on every flight I heard passengers ask the steward/ess about the service termination. They all said it was because of the rent hike.
billy wrote on Aug 29, 2008 3:30 AM:
Have they put any phones in yet?
NB wrote on Aug 28, 2008 6:33 AM:
The people who think all the complaining should stop and just enjoy the building, must not be taxpayers who always get stuck with paying for things that don't work out. That is a way more expensive building than North Bend Airport needed (thats the name I use for the airport IN NORTH BEND) in the first place, and now Horizon is pulling out, we may or may not get another Portland flight, and now the building is having one problem after another, AND we are not supposed to complain ???
Daniel L. Baumann wrote on Aug 27, 2008 8:55 PM:
I think the new terminal looks great and there will be a few bugs that need to be worked out as with anything new. However, if repairs are to be made it "SHOULD NOT" come out of the taxpayers money. The contractors should do the work at no cost to the airport or traxpayers. I AM RUNNING FOR A SEAT ON THE COOS BAY COUNCIL. Vote 4 Daniel L. Baumann Coos Bay Councilman.
MM wrote on Aug 27, 2008 1:34 PM:
I think the new airport is a beautiful building. It is suppose to resemble a salmon. The tiles are amazing how they change colors as you are walking toward the terminal. I never have seen anything like it. I wish people would stop complaining and just enjoy it. There is always problems at first which always get sorted out. If all the negitive, complaining people thought they could do it better why don't you get involved and been seen not just heard!!
DANIEL BAUMANN wrote on Aug 27, 2008 9:50 AM:
TO THE AIRPORT BOARD: I say lease out the "OLD TERMINAL" to Ocean Air they are a great group of people. If Coos Aviation wants to build a new facility, why not put them in the Ocean Air building. JUST A THOUGHT! By the way, I am running for Coos Bay Councilman.
Tony wrote on Aug 26, 2008 4:46 PM:
Also just a side note from us seniors. Why no sidewalks? You have to walk in the traffic lanes at night, with our misty windshields I foresee a problem of pedistrians getting struck by irritated people leaving our showpiece. Well it must be a blessing we won't have any night flights to endanger our pedistrians. .
Kris wrote on Aug 26, 2008 11:30 AM:
Steve - first of all don;t patronize me. Second ... if you read the newspaper you will realize that the Board is trying to find a northern solution. They are in negotiations with SkyWest to take on the north bound flights. I think the board is doing a wonderful job and needs to be left alone. The only thing that I feel they need to do now is get rid of Mr. Letellier.
Steve Pickering wrote on Aug 26, 2008 10:19 AM:
Thank You Kris,
You are welcome to vote for whomever you like. But VOTE. Many here only complain.
As to the issues at the airport, yes there are start up problems. That I accept.
But the design from the parking lot side resembles an old green shingled gymnasium and will soon look like a brown shingled gymnasium. From the inside or runway view it is beautiful and a real jewel in the Coos Bay landscape, but I just can't get over the resemblance to some of the old hangers and warehouses on the water front and the feeling it is a blimp hanger.
It is too late to change it so now we must embrace it for what it is. If the current board can not find a way to restore service north (or keep it) then maintenance or repairs will be only a small part of the history that will be written about this.
Actually a Blimp Hanger theme is kinda cool at the airport.
Tony wrote on Aug 25, 2008 7:40 PM:
Yep! They got low bid work. There is a policy to have construction work, material ( Siding) and procedures ( Concrete curing )inspected on Public Money Work. It appears we were saved the cost of proper inspection work on the facility. When we went to see our new showpiece of the South Coast we made a actual count of close to half the plantings dying. . .
Coos Bay Resident wrote on Aug 25, 2008 6:57 PM:
I was over at the airport as well ealier today and I agree with KRIS, the terminal looks great. Anything new will always have bugs to work out. I have made one trip to the "Real Bay Area" and the service was great.
Citizen wrote on Aug 25, 2008 6:05 PM:
I hope that grinding the stainless isn't the solution. Otherwise add another staff position to constantly "fix" them. Whatever they use to remove the rust will transfer metal that rusts easier than the stainless. My money is on the rood being installed without enough thought. Whatever is found to be the root cause here will likely be silly.
Kris wrote on Aug 25, 2008 4:21 PM:
Steve,
You are a very negative person and if you are running for any sort of office I will NOT be voting for you. I think that the new airport is beautiful and will be well used well into the future. Thank you to the hard working board members.
Common Sense wrote on Aug 25, 2008 2:54 PM:
Kinda funny in a pathetic kind of way, that the new airport (Airport Executive Director Gary LeTellieris & rest of the Coos County Airport District commissioners clowns) are worried about everything but the important thing.....a new airline company to replace Horizon airlines!!!
P.S. Not sure who's the worse between the BIG 3 (Coos Bay counsel members, Port Commissioners members or Coos County Airport District commissioners)...a real toss UP on what I call the 3 stooges....
Sherry wrote on Aug 25, 2008 2:15 PM:
Good job RAFFERTY. Stay on this story.
I was also locked in the womens bathroom again last week. My husband had to get me out after I called him on my cell phone. We only had to wait 45 minutes for our bags this time.. Much improved. PDX was 20 minutes.I feel this airport mess has many more problems to come. The board has blood on their hands.
Nick wrote on Aug 25, 2008 1:11 PM:
Yes, let's enjoy this airport for the month and a half left with service to Oregon's commercial hub. Let's enjoy the constant mismanagement of millions of dollars, and the shoddy contracting work done on the airport. The vast majority of citizens in this area who will never use the airport should ENJOY it!
I can tell you for a fact that it is GROSS NEGLIGENCE for a concrete contractor to forget sawing joints in a concrete pad. There's no excuse for it, and they should, without question, foot the bill for those issues (seems like they are, luckily). As for some concrete drying too early, it is apparent that the contractor AND Mr Anderson forget that there are methods to keep this from happening (one of the simplest is to postpone concrete pouring until the weather is adequate... keeping the concrete moist is also routine). Maybe if we had people who knew what they were doing AND were from this area, we'd have alleviated these problems.
bob wrote on Aug 25, 2008 1:07 PM:
sawing concrete does not prevent cracking, it directs the cracking to where the cut is made. The crack occurs beneath the cut. As far as drying too quickly, that's why you'll see a sprinkler in use on some new pours. Glad to see this will all be corrected without additional cost.
Mark Smith wrote on Aug 25, 2008 12:50 PM:
Here comes the hands out approach again. 20 million spent, now we need another 1 million to repair shoddy work.
John Q Taxpayer to the rescue
"Ask not whether to give, but how much the airport needs"
WHATTHEBLEEP wrote on Aug 25, 2008 12:26 PM:
Are the Southwest Oregon Regional Airport and Southwestern Oregon Community College located in Brookings or Medford, Gold Beach or Grants Pass? Is The World newspaper published in London or Tokyo? It would sure help the rest of the planet find us, or at least know we exist, if the name of the best known geographical feature, Coos Bay, were included in their titles. Since North Bend is the north bend of Coos Bay, and there is a city in Washington State bearing the same name, it seems that Coos Bay would be the shortest and simplest identifier.
CB RESIDENT wrote on Aug 25, 2008 12:24 PM:
I have to say I was impressed with the new airport. It felt like "BIG" city (so to speak) There is always bugs to be worked out with any new building along with the changes that has happened. I wish people would quite pissing and moaning about something that is a whole lot nicer than this area has seen in a long, long time. I too, agree it was a lot of money, but now that its done, lets enjoy it. By the way, I didn't think it took an overly long time to get my baggage when I returned home from a trip. The difference is, you don't have to walk ten miles to get to the baggage claim area.
BOB wrote on Aug 25, 2008 12:11 PM:
Well what is that old saying? you get what you paid for? Maybe they should have spent $21 million...who knew? This isn't the first time the concrete company has had to re-do a project. Across from Benetti's the plaza had to be redone also. (Benetti's Walkway)
Steve Pickering wrote on Aug 25, 2008 11:54 AM:
I pointed out the rust (some of it had been ground off) during the grand opening gala and I was told rather rudely I was crazy.
ronop wrote on Aug 25, 2008 11:25 AM:
Could anything else possibly be wrong with that airport and management?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines