State denies appeal of LNG opponents

By Elise Hamner, Assistant Editor
Saturday, August 23, 2008 | 7 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news

Related Links

It’s smooth sailing again for the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay and its proposal to dig a berth on the North Spit for liquefied natural gas tankers.

At least for now.

The Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals on Friday denied an appeal by opponents, challenging Coos County’s approval of the permit. They contended the port’s application process to excavate the 1,000-foot-wide by 1,200-foot-long docking area didn’t meet state land use requirements or the Coos Bay Estuary Management Plan.

LUBA disagreed on all points.

Port officials were pleased with Friday’s decision.

“At least this gives us the ability to go to the next steps on construction of the waterway,” said Martin Callery, port director of communications and freight mobility.

But the LNG berth is no sure development.

“I don’t believe you will see anybody furiously digging away,” Callery said.

The next step really lies with the Jordan Cove Energy Partners. Jordan Cove has to get the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to approve the overall LNG project and natural gas pipeline. That decision is a long way off.

There is one possibility for action at the state level. Opponents now have 21 days to file an appeal to LUBA’s ruling, according to a LUBA spokeswoman. That paperwork then would go to the Oregon Court of Appeals.

Oregon Shores CoastWatch Director Phillip Johnson said his group had just heard of LUBA’s decision and was studying it to determine the group’s next step.

“The decision doesn’t really address the fact that we’re talking about a large industrial development primarily benefiting California that would seriously impact a very important estuary,” he said. “Estuaries are some of the most important, the most threatened habitats on the planet. Protecting estuaries by any standard should be a priority.”

Steve Jones of Citizens Against LNG said he was less involved with this case than with an earlier one. But either way, he said LNG is doomed here.

The project’s proposed location in a tsunami zone is leverage the opponents can use to block the offloading facility, he said.

The energy commission is expected to release a draft environmental impact statement for the LNG project this fall. The federal agency set a tentative deadline of May 2009 to make a final ruling on the project.

Jones figures supply and demand could mean an end to the project, too. The LNG market nationwide is not strong.

“We’re looking at the market,” Jones said. “If we don’t kill this beast here in the bay, the market will kill it.”

— Staff Writer Susan Chambers contributed to this report.



Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Al the Pal wrote on Aug 25, 2008 5:51 PM:

Let's all band together and stand in the way of any progress. Hell, let's turn off all the electricity and go back to horse and buggies.

Naw, that would never work.

Someone with a fondness for the old caveman days might object.

I can't wait until the wheel is introduced into Coos County. It'll spark an industrial revolution!

Thomas Cook wrote on Aug 25, 2008 9:52 AM:

In case you guys missed it, Freeport and Chienere LNG are appling to EXPORT LNG. So, all this stuff doesn't matter as there will never be a regas terminal built anywhere on the West Coast of America.

Holly wrote on Aug 25, 2008 9:10 AM:

TWO recently opened LNG terminals applied to EXPORT their first shipments of LNG because they cannot sell it in the US. This would be Cheniere's Sabine Pass and the Freeport LNG terminal. Oh, and Cheniere's credit rating is in the toilet, and their stock is trading at 1000% less than this time last year. Steve Jones is right, and you Limbaugh fans need to do your homework.

Bulldog wrote on Aug 23, 2008 7:33 PM:

I hope that when this is all over and the plant is built that those who stood in the way and filed lawsuits are sued for the cost of their interference. It seems that these environistas think that they are going to get a free ride. The easiest way to get them to shape up and be reasonable is to attack them in the pocketbook. I seem to remember a logging company doing this successfully a few years back.

gene wrote on Aug 23, 2008 6:45 PM:

Once again government bureaucracy at it finest. how do people that wear side blinders and refuse to see the bigger picture get into these positions of power with no accountability.

Edward wrote on Aug 23, 2008 11:30 AM:

I'm sure the anti-LNG faction knows more about the market than an LNG logistics company. Perhaps Steve Jones should turn off CNBC and join us in reality.

Common Sense wrote on Aug 23, 2008 8:44 AM:

Great news, the Port Commission clowns can dig their OWN grave now, since this California LNG SCAM is going no where FAST! Of course the real loser is the tax payer, pathetically paying their wages & for any future digging!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections