State officials, locals rail on CORP

By Rachael McDonald, Eugene Correspondent
Saturday, August 23, 2008 | 7 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
EUGENE — Members of the U.S. Surface Transportation Board came to Eugene on Thursday to consider the fate of the rail line that connects Coquille to Eugene.

Chairman Charles Nottingham and Commissioner Douglas Buttrey listened to more than six hours of testimony from about 40 speakers. Vice Chairman Francis Mulvey was unable to come because he’s recovering from a bicycle accident.

Gov. Ted Kulongoski and Congressman Peter Defazio, D-Ore., were the first to speak. They both called on Nottingham and Buttrey to refuse a request by Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad to abandon the line.

Kulongoski told them the region already is suffering from the loss of Greyhound buses and the threat of commercial air service cancellation to Portland.

“At some point providing infrastructure for rural America cannot be just a bottom line-accounting decision,” Kulongoski said. “Otherwise small economic regions like the southern Oregon coast will become more isolated and economically unstable.”

Both Kulongoski and Defazio blasted managers of CORP’s parent company RailAmerica, which is owned by Fortress Investment Group LLC, a New York-based equity fund manager. Defazio said the company bought the railroad, knowing full well its condition, with no intention of making repairs. He called the company’s request a “bad faith abandonment proposal.”  

The board also is considering an application from the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay to buy the rail line for $9.8 million. Kulongoski and Defazio voiced support for the proposal and the governor pledged state assistance to buy the line.

The port didn’t have unanimous support from speakers, because of its pursuit of a liquefied natural gas terminal development. Anti-LNG activist Jody McCaffree of North Bend said she supports restarting the railroad. However, she is concerned about the port being in charge of it, since an LNG facility would entail shipping natural gas byproducts on the rail line.

CORP halted traffic in late September 2007, giving only 24 hours notice. Since then, industry has scrambled to get products across the coast range.

American Bridge Plant Manager Fred Jacquot said his company had planned to increase its workforce from 80 to 120 employees and to expand its operations, but the company has lost new contracts because of the added cost of trucking. The Reedsport manufacturer of steel components for bridges has projects including the San Francisco Bay Bridge and Hoover Dam Bypass.

 The board got an earful on how hard hit the region is by the rail line loss. Roseburg Forest Products’ president, Allyn Ford, who heads of the Coos-Siskyou Shippers Coalition, urged the board to accept the Port of Coos Bay’s feeder line proposal.   

“Access to inland markets is key to our survival,” he said. “We export most of our finished products to major markets in the states west of the Mississippi River. Rail is the only economical way to access these inland markets.”

Menasha Forest Products’ Eric Farm echoed those comments, saying that if he’s forced to truck every load, it costs $300 more per load. That adds up to $3.2 million a year in higher costs at a time the economy already is in trouble.

Speakers also pointed out the danger of putting more trucks on the roads that snake through the coast range.

Chairman Nottingham was sympathetic.

“There are people in Washington who probably need to fully appreciate what’s going on here and how it continues to ripple,” he told them. “We’ve heard today about extensive societal costs that are playing out in this region and across the country.”

RailAmerica’s vice president of operations, Paul Lundberg, and company attorney Terrance Hynes defended their railroad, saying it made a good faith effort but the line just isn’t profitable.

“We didn’t walk away,” Lundberg said. “We tried for several months to come to terms with a relationship that was going to maintain service on the Coos Bay line, as well as protect the interests of the Central Oregon and Pacific Railroad.”  

Hynes said the line was losing money and the only way to save service is through a public-private partnership. He then praised the federal process. That prompted Nottingham to shoot back that people who’ve lost their jobs in Coos County would not agree that the process has gone well.
To comment




The Surface Transportation Board will continue to take comments from the public on the Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad’s abandonment proposal and on the Port of Coos Bay’s feeder line request.


To file comments send an original letter to:





Honorable Anne K. Quinlan, Acting Secretary


Surface Transportation Board


395 E St. S.W.


Washington, D.C. 20423






Those filing comments to Quinlan, or online at http://www.stb.dot.gov, should refer to the following docket numbers and include the following information in the memo line.





• STB Docket No. AB-515 (Sub-No. 2)


Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad, Inc. - Abandonment and Discontinuance of Service - in Coos, Douglas and Lane Counties, Oregon


Written comments and/or testimony due by August 28, 2008





• STB Finance Docket No. 35160


Oregon International Port of Coos Bay - Feeder Line Application - Coos Bay Line of the Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad, Inc.




Written comments and/or testimony due by August 29, 2008





Interested people and/or organizations can comment on both actions in the same document and both STB docket numbers should be noted in the subject line.




Electronic filing of documents can be done at www.stb.dot.gov. Follow link to e-filings and access "Other Submissions (Correspondence/Comments)," then fill in required information, including docket number(s), then attach comments/testimony at bottom of page where indicated.

Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Steve Pickering wrote on Aug 25, 2008 10:13 AM:

Once the tracks are removed they will never (EVER) return. That is not an opinion but a solid fact. Railroads are no longer able to obtain the rights of way needed to construct lines. Once abandoned they become bike trails and real-estate. With the nature of Highway 101 a rail line is an absolute necessity to attract family wage jobs, now or in the future.

I do not think the Port should be in the railroad business, but they are the only player. If they do not get this line then it will become history. I support the purchase, but not the operation, by the Port. Once we stop CORP from destroying the line we can seek competent operators to provide rail service.

Citizen wrote on Aug 23, 2008 7:36 AM:

Let's back up. When has the government known how to run any business? They are operating so far in the red it's insane. What was needed to keep the railroad in this area was and is industry. The Casino, resteraunts, the downtown, tourism, new air terminal, or Costco do absolutely nothing to make a rail road profitable. Government involvement, like super complainer Peter DeFazio, will make any investor nervous now.

Edward wrote on Aug 22, 2008 9:09 PM:

To gain a railroad in addition to a deep water port is a perfect cornerstone for future growth. I fully back the Port and wish them well. And perhaps one day we'll also have a steam engine taking passengers across the coast range in addition to the usual products!

Thomas wrote on Aug 22, 2008 4:27 PM:

I'd really like to read a comment about this situation from a Republican politician.

Camby Collier wrote on Aug 22, 2008 2:19 PM:

I was at the hearing ALL DAY yesterday. It is admirable the Port wants to get the rail going, but it should be another private/public/or state agency. The Port is NOT elected, they are appointed, which is why they do not need to hear our ideas for the North Spit. They do not know anything about running a railroad. They have TOO much on their plate right now unresolved. i.e. LNG, cargo terminal, and pursuing chemicals plants....how about permanently fixing our jetties? If they were interim (like 3 months) to get things going and then hand it over to an ELECTED group of people, that would be OK. The local businesses that use the rail are being overburdened by trucking costs. WE NEED THE RAIL, but you need to know it is a LOOSING venture that will be paid by the taxpayers....$140 million and probably a lot more (up to $400 million) to fix and $1.5 million a year in maintenance costs that will be paid by YOU. Let's talk about it...come to the Port Meeting, Monday, Aug 25, 7 pm at Port officies and sign in for public comment

Thomas wrote on Aug 22, 2008 1:26 PM:

" ... and the only way to save service is through a public-private partnership."

Fine ........ so please elaborate on how The International Port of Coos Bay represents the "public" partner?

Join Jihad wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:30 PM:

The Cleric McCaffrey has issued a Fattah – infidels beware your jobs are expendable if they have any ties to the great Satan! Mill workers go start getting training to be a barista or start your own home business making tie-dye shirts for the surfer dudes and join the LNG Jihad! The middle class is just a myth of the infidels! You can only be rich or serve the rich.

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | BlogThe World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections