Oil balls at New Carissa site

By Jolene Guzman and Elise Hamner, Staff Writers
Friday, August 15, 2008 | 14 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
Titan Salvage reported oil residue in the surf and at the beach at the New Carissa this morning.

A Titan Salvage spokesman called The World about 10:25 a.m. to report an incident.

“We’ve got a spill out here at the New Carissa,” he said, offering no other details.

Rough seas and Titan’s effort to pull up the stern released some residual tar balls out of the shipwreck, according to Titan Managing Director David Parrot.

The material is not in liquid from, but a hard combination of tar and sand, he said.

The balls vary in size from one quarter-inch to 6 inches in size. About 150 yards of the beach has been affected so far. Titan called out the Coos Bay Oil Spill Response Cooperative around 8:30 a.m. The six-member team will collect the tar balls as they wash ashore today and through the weekend.

By 12:30 p.m., the release of tar bits seemed to have subsided.

An NRC Environmental Services team is on the way from Portland to replace the local team later today, according to Holly Tavernier, the Coos Bay response team administrative coordinator.

The balls, that look more like tiny pancakes, are giving off a slight sheen, but not enough oil to be sucked up by booms. And that's a good thing, since the oil spill responders can't deploy booms in the rough sea.

"It's washing up on the beach. It's very tedious work to walk around to pick them up," Tavernier said.

Parrot said he expects more to wash up as the bad weather persists. The team will be on an around-the-clock watch and collection effort.

“We are treating it seriously,” he said.
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Ron wrote on Aug 17, 2008 4:53 PM:

The twenty million or so dollars awarded in the lawsuit by the State of Oregon versus the new Clarissa owners is specifically for the removal and cleanup. Period. Use the money for that purpose of let it rot on account. It is unlawful to use that money for buying bait for tourists, chewing tobaccy for you ignorant nay-sayer complainers, or paing for little Annies drug rehab. Again, period. Do you people get it yet? Enough already. We will all miss the wreck. Let's miss it without attempting to lay blame on every POL who supports its removal. Find something that can actually be changed and complain about that, okay?

Tag Ur It wrote on Aug 17, 2008 3:55 PM:

*The quality control is in place.
*The project has brought in money to the area.
*The paper is selling photos and has a constant news story.
*Thanks Titan for the show!
Too bad for the reef that was forming there <@><

Think first.... wrote on Aug 16, 2008 5:15 PM:

We are not paying for the cleanup and removal, and in that money could never have been used to serve the other needs of Oregonians. This was money received from a lawsuit against the company that owned the New Carissa. As for this being a tourist attraction-yes it was at first, but in recent years it had washed closer to shore and had been covered by so much sand you could not see it...
I agree, they are doing a good job out there and are handling the removal with the professionalism and good public-relations.

SUSAN wrote on Aug 16, 2008 6:30 AM:

it was a tourist attraction, a breeding and feeding ground for fish for over 10 years and it did not cost us a thing.. And we are paying millions of dollars to remove it and turn our beaches into an oil dump....boy who's idea was this???? not the community!

UsedLiveHere wrote on Aug 15, 2008 10:02 PM:

Tar Balls? Being picked up? and the problem is??? I think this was handled properly, especially when Titan called the local news. They didn't HAVE to do that. They indeed had to notify State authorities, and even Federal, but not the local news paper. I'm favorably impressed.
It appears you have a well-managed operation going on over there.

debbie wrote on Aug 15, 2008 7:42 PM:

Why did we not leave it there, it as tourist attraction. and id anything we need in NB/ Coosbay is some kind of touist attraction.

wow wrote on Aug 15, 2008 7:25 PM:

wow,
thats just beyond dumb..what a total waste.

Mark wrote on Aug 15, 2008 6:20 PM:

what is the big deal? Did the money not come from the ships insurance company anyway? Better to clean the mess up now then have these tar balls start washing up on the beach 20 years from now when the ship has rusted away to nothing. Then people would ask why did the State do nothing when they had the chance.

CB Man wrote on Aug 15, 2008 5:41 PM:

Do you people realize that the money we won from the lawsuit can only be used for the removal and any clean up necessary for the New Carissa? This can be found if you care to search a little on Google or The World's site. As for the oil, we knew it was there, but no clue on to how much. Hence why we have a person from Texas to overlook the oil levels on the beach (see yesterday's paper). Even if you think it's a waste of money or not, we would have this oil leak out soon or later.

ononomous wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:21 PM:

I agree, a huge waste of money that could of been spent doing more good in our state, than removing the Carissa. Food Pantry supplies, clothing for needy people in the area, developing an area for the homeless to inhabit~that would be legal, trying to get more business and jobs in our area. And, there wouldn't be the hassle of picking up tar balls!

KRISTINE wrote on Aug 15, 2008 2:28 PM:

Why wait how many years???? to do something about it!! I just can't believe the complete ignorance about the whole thing!!

What Now wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:42 PM:

I think we should bring a lawsuit against the state for any damage cuased by the tarballs. I am sure they are affecting sea-life.

DIRK wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:29 PM:

Should have just let the Carissa sit as a tourist attraction and fish habitat. Linda is soooo right!!!

Linda wrote on Aug 15, 2008 11:14 AM:

What a ridiculous waste of money.

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | BlogThe World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections