Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Bob braddock says no local jobs for lng at Jordan cove wrote on Sep 9, 2008 6:54 AM:
everyman wrote on Aug 26, 2008 3:39 PM:
I am niether silly nor pathetic..
I said one of a slew of alternatives...that means one of many...I also said that this is not a silver bullet...but it is a viable, useable alternative
The Jobs I am talking about are not ones that our teens can walk into right now, but ones that they can strive for in the future...when existing employees retire, move away, etc...our kids need something that they can bring thier families back to, if they go get an education elsewhere...
And please stop calling me names...you are making me angry...and you won't like me when I'm angry...(EYES TURNING GREEN)
(cue the old "Incredible Hulk" music)
EVERYMAN SMASH!!
Everyman the issue is LNG at Jordan Cove was appealed due to Tsunami issue wrote on Aug 19, 2008 12:06 PM:
Jane wrote on Aug 19, 2008 7:48 AM:
Thinking if this California LNG SCAM comes here, it creates our independence? Sorry, but that creates the opposite situation (dependence) on other countries outside of the USA. Especially since this is twice as expensive as the natural gas used today by Oregon citizens!
Stating you don't care if the jobs created by this SCAM are for outsiders (non local residents) or insiders (Local residents), but hoping the teens of this area will benefit from this, when all the jobs will be filled by outside of the area people picked by Bob Braddock? ZERO jobs for this area means ZERO jobs for everyone in Oregon (Including teens)!
Thinking your little nonsense posts are in fun, keeping things light, when the majority of Oregon doesn't want or need this accident waiting to happen garbage, some people will actually be forced to sell their land also, think again! You must be a used car salesman on the weekends & hoping to cash in on this SCAM at Jordon Cove some how, on why you post so much nonsense in here!
Common Sense wrote on Aug 18, 2008 11:34 PM:
Your Quote: "This is one of a slew of alternative resources at our disposal to use in becoming energy-independant"
How is importing the expensive LNG (2X more expensive then natural gas used today by Oregon citizens) creating any kind of independence for future USA energy needs?
Answer: NONE (Creates more dependence on outside sources)
How is having this California LNG SCAM helping Oregon when all the jobs will be given to outsiders & NOT Oregon residents? How is this helping "create jobs here that our teens can strive for down the road instead of moving away and never looking back"?
Answer: It's NOT (No jobs for our teens)
How fair is it that Oregon resident will be FORCED to give up their land to this ZERO job producer just so a 36 inch pipe can go thru it on it's 230 mile way to California?
Answer: Totally unfair & a form of dictatorship!
Oregon's Dept of Energy says NO & majority of Oregon's residents says NO to this SCAM, thus nothin funny about this situation to "lighten up about" as you would pathetically say...
everyman wrote on Aug 18, 2008 11:54 AM:
I am having some fun with the posts because I think a little brevity MAY help lighten things up...
But my opinions are thus; yes there is risk with this proposed plant, but it is managable...and can be addressed by level heads that assess this kind of risk as a profession, not by "laymen", so to speak, like you or me.
As for the expense/need of LNG; let the market decide. I could care less where it is shipped, as long as it is handled with some TLC, ship it to the moon, for all I care...
This is one of a slew of alternative resources at our disposal to use in becoming energy-independant. It is NOT a silver bullet that will fix our energy woes...
And finally, the jobs; outsiders, insiders, I don't care, just get them here and employ them...and while we're at it, create jobs here that our teens can strive for down the road instead of moving away and never looking back.
Love, Everyman
Dave wrote on Aug 18, 2008 7:57 AM:
everywoman wrote on Aug 16, 2008 11:34 AM:
Jane wrote on Aug 16, 2008 8:46 AM:
Answer is:
Posts created by Everyman, Edward, Moonpenny, Joesixpack!
moonpenny wrote on Aug 15, 2008 11:37 PM:
I have never seen so many paranoid people in my life. How on earth do you survive a typical day when life already holds surprises? I feel pity for you, to think that something such as a fuel line is the end of the world.
moonpenny wrote on Aug 15, 2008 11:27 PM:
Yes I am a homeowner and a business owner. I do pay my taxes and I am registered to vote and I will have MY opinion heard. If YOU dont like it than you go retire somewhere else. Unless you can convince the tree huggers to reverse the logging restrictions, suck it up. This area is going to grow whether you like it or not.
gene wrote on Aug 15, 2008 5:52 PM:
ROBERT wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:44 PM:
everyman wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:29 PM:
Give up?
A LNG tanker will LEAVE the bay area when it empties it's gas...
Thomas wrote on Aug 15, 2008 11:14 AM:
OK, then why has no one, especially the Jordan Cove people, addressed the blatantly obvious and clearly unpreventable threat from a terrorist attack on an LNG ship as it slowly passes within the blast zone range of many local resident's homes or jobs, or just people unlucky to be at the wrong spot when it happens?
If LNG does come here, and America continues to be a terrorist target, then the probability of such an event is far from negligible. Please tell us why making everyone here unnecessarily face that risk is not sociopathy?
Port Commissioners county rest of state leaders selling out wrote on Aug 15, 2008 8:52 AM:
Citizen wrote on Aug 14, 2008 9:51 PM:
gene wrote on Aug 14, 2008 8:27 PM:
The answer is all of us. Its true we get the government we deserve. Or as a friend of mine used to say (we have the best politicians money can buy). There is not one elected official representing us that openly opposes this LNG project. Which means they are privately for it . That should tell us who our government represents. The politicians I contacted were quick to wash their hands and represent that they have not formed an opinion on LNG, don't have the power to stop the process or they don't respond at all. That's crap and we know it. They were informed of its existence long before the general public was told. If they truly are not knowledgeable in the dangers of LNG then they aren't smart enough to have their job or they are too corrupt and should be replaced.
Everyman wrote on Aug 14, 2008 3:17 PM:
John; I have a great job, in an industry totally unrelated to politcs, LNG, railroads, etc...no matter what people claim regarding me...
Jane (heavy sigh)...How many times do I have to tell you...I don't know Bob Braddock...I am not a FAN, as you put it...and it only takes me a few minutes a day to post on here...
Want facts? Here's some...your arguments are WEAK, you must stand to profit from keeping LNG away from here, and I bet you, like Hiltler, believe that all AUSLANDERS should RAUS (outlanders get out), since you dislike foriegners and californians so much...
Selling Out wrote on Aug 14, 2008 8:01 AM:
"You WILL move away to avoid all this danger, right?" EVERYMAN
Right ........ and also to avoid how LNG will degrade and depress Coos county.
The upcoming national depression will probably delay or stop this sociopathic nonsense, but if it does come here anyway, then the best advice for sane residents who can move is to sell before property prices start dropping and it gets harder to sell.
FYI - Some buyers are holding off making offers until they know if the area will have air service to the north.
John wrote on Aug 14, 2008 7:44 AM:
But I don't think you are observant enough to even be a watchman. By the way, why dont YOU use your real name?
gene wrote on Aug 14, 2008 6:50 AM:
Edward wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:35 PM:
Jane wrote on Aug 13, 2008 6:54 PM:
Thomas wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:53 AM:
Right ........ and also to avoid how LNG will degrade and depress Coos county.
The upcoming national depression will probably delay or stop this sociopathic nonsense, but if it does come here anyway, then the best advice for sane residents who can move is to sell before property prices start dropping and it gets harder to sell.
Its Beautiful here wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:13 AM:
We all have to share this planet so I am from the same one you are on. And I have been here a long time. I realize that there is a"Good Ole Boys" system here, isn't there everywhere? Actually those GOB's seem to be the ones wanting these businesses here. Fear isn't the reason there are no industries here. It's because we don't have a straight route to I5 and it has been and always will be that way until we get one. We can also thank the environmental groups for shutting down the timber industry. There was more business here in the 40's than there is now. And fishermen made good money too. Tell me about kids leaving because there is nothing here...you are preaching to the choir. But listening to the same old arguments back and forth is not going to solve anything and neither is the LNG facility. I don't have the answer but you can't just blame the GOB's forever...well you can but what does that solve?
Oldest ploy in the world in any failed argument wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:15 AM:
Everyman: asking if people would move or not IF Lng would come here?
Others: 9.0 would ruin this area anyways, I haven't seen a 100 ft Tsunami lately, Lng will produce jobs, Lng is safe, etc.
Reality is: Lng was ignored by county & LUBA on Tsunami zone issue vs DLCD requirements. Lng will produce about 40 - 50 full time jobs that NO local resident will qualify for due to educational & experience requirements!
everyman wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:03 AM:
I (snif, snif) am so sorry. Me so sad dat nobody buy you land. (big sad face)
So you you want me to bail you out, huh...so it isn't really about fearing for your lives...it's about property values...and you want ME to bail YOU out...if that don't beat all...
Show Me The Money wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:17 PM:
So...IF, and granted, thats a big if right now...the Jordan Cove thing gets approved and all and starts construction...do you believe that the danger is real enough to make you move away? I mean, since it's going to ruin the area, and potentially kill hundreds, if not thousands...you don't want to live in that kind of fear, do you? You WILL move away to avoid all this danger, right?
Right after YOU buy my house and property! You must have the bucks to compensate the people who want to move to spare their lives but, can't because no one else will buy their property. Come on, how much do you want your LNG? If it is so great you should be willing to buy at least one person out. After all you're going to make all that money working over there at the LNG facility. Right?
North Bay wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:39 PM:
Sheesh, now that's something to consider.
(putting my aluminum beanie on pronto)
North Bay wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:32 PM:
What a sad, last ditch, obviously desperate and certainly LAUGHABLE tactic: the false 'safety card'.
BRING LNG HERE, give us some real career opportunities, improve public safety and tax base, and the ancillary benefits of increased spending (hotel, travel, food, clothing, services, etc) this will obviously bring to the area regardless which side of the aisle you're on.
Refresh my memory wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:19 PM:
WithYouEveryman wrote on Aug 12, 2008 12:11 PM:
The "Good Ole Boys" running Coos Cnty have and will oppose any business' wanting to relocate here...they fear progress in any form. There is no "industry" here because of ignorance and fear. Our young people have no future here...it's only a town to go and die in right now....hopefully with LNG and others the area can be revived.
Sorry Everyman but the issue is tsunami zone LNG safety requirements wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:38 AM:
Its Beautiful here wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:28 AM:
everyman wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:24 AM:
Pro Lng supporters are getting pretty desperate in here wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:54 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:41 AM:
Quote: "Would anyone ignore proper installation of electrical, gas at their own house let alone ignore this Lng structure at Jordan Cove in a Tsunami zone?"
I can see Bob's boys are gettin pretty desperate in here by sayin it's ok to blindly put this California LNG SCAM in a Tsunami hazard zone, just so some foreign investor can get RICHER & so California can get the gas! Such a DEAL for Oregon...
Are you kidding me wrote on Aug 12, 2008 2:11 AM:
I am not saying LNG is the way to go but it is at least something. If you are going to gripe about why LNG sould not move in then give a real reason.
The next things you'll start to hear is, you know lightning might strike the tank when they are unloading the ship then what??? One of the people on the ship may be wearing corduroy pants that can build up a static charge and KABOOM! UFO's my show up and point there death ray at it and well you know what happens then! Give a valid reason and I will listen, until then, stop being so dooms day about what "IS" going to happen.
ROBERT wrote on Aug 11, 2008 11:18 PM:
everyman wrote on Aug 11, 2008 4:38 PM:
The concern here is a tsunami...now, I know that Jane/Common sense/Ronop, etc will yell "WEAK argument" and "LNG SCAM" and all...but...if we have a tsunami, I really think a problem at our local LNG facility will be the LEAST of our problems. Drive around CB/NB and tell me how many gas tanks, power lines, airports (goodbye, 10-million dollars) and other sources of risk exist, not to mention how many homes will be torn up or float away, none of which have been built with the codes and regs that a new lng facility will have.
And if a tsunami is such a huge and likely risk...why are we still here? Lets move somewhere safe, for crying out loud.
Thomas wrote on Aug 11, 2008 4:06 PM:
How stupid are we to believe these promised "JOBS'' trumps all, or even are for real???
Coos Bay was only a viable port for exporting cheap resources, aka 3rd world, which regardless of hype has passed us ......... or for maybe now importing something that no sane community would!
Let's please build upon what we are, A GREAT PLACE, rather than on what these hucksters fill us full of, as if we were a primative post-WWII cargo cult in the South Seas.
Goal wrote on Aug 11, 2008 1:17 PM:
Parts of Goal 7:
To protect people and property from natural hazards. Natual hazards for the purposes of this goal are:...earthquakes and related hazards, tsunamis, coastal erosion,...a. AVIODING DEVELOPMENT in hazard areas where the RISK TO PEOPLE AND PROPERTY cannot be mitigated; and, b PROHIBITING the siting of essential facilities major structures, HAZARDOUS FACILITIES ...B. Implementation 5.b. prohibiting the storage of hazardous materials in floodplains
Note: Essential facilities means you cannot build a school, fire dept, police dept, hospital or hazardous industry where they want to put this LNG terminal in Coos Bay. The JCEP is on the most vunerable spot for tsunamis.
OK Now wrote on Aug 11, 2008 10:46 AM:
How pathetic this state is ignoring a Tsunami zone wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:47 AM:
Hey Bob Braddock what you gonna do now wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:04 AM:
X Coos Bay Resident wrote on Aug 10, 2008 6:26 PM:
Danielle wrote on Aug 10, 2008 3:01 PM:
gene wrote on Aug 10, 2008 2:55 PM:
This LNG project is unsafe why it was ignored engineering wise at Jordan Cove wrote on Aug 10, 2008 2:34 PM:
Tsunamis hazard zone ignored by county LUBA wrote on Aug 10, 2008 2:21 PM:
Bob wrote on Aug 10, 2008 9:39 AM:
everyman wrote on Aug 9, 2008 7:27 PM:
Does the word PROOFREAD mean anything to you?
Edward wrote on Aug 9, 2008 4:17 PM:
moonpenny wrote on Aug 9, 2008 11:04 AM:
OMG what if we had an earthquaked, tsunami'd, wind powered, dam breaking, red tide growing, hail inspired, fire blazing, terrorist blasting storm???
"Everyone quick, into your caves, if we don't look maybe it will go away"!
Whiners, suck it up, LNG is going to be here, if you dont like it, move.
Shiela D wrote on Aug 9, 2008 10:00 AM:
And sorry Ronop, I'm intent on voting OUT the incumbents who never bothered to address this previously.
Mr. Prince is correct - It's been highly overlooked. You people railing on and on about how he's from Eugene are simply diverting from the issue, and that is that having a handful more minimum wage jobs in this area is not worth the safety issues!
Thomas wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:26 AM:
Why an LNG facility was ever given serious consideration for such an obviously unsuitable site is mindboggling.
Jane wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:13 AM:
Have to agree with prior posts, why wasn't this Tsunami zone issue addressed at the county level in the first place? This should convince residents of this area that good ole boy system John Griffith was being paid off to ignore this issue & many other issues found in LUBA appeal. Face the facts of this Tsunami issue, this LNG at Jordan Cove was not even reviewed engineering wise (Ignored in the first place), knowing full well it couldn't withstand a 9.0 + Earthquake or up to a 100 foot tidal/Tsunami wave! Maybe this time, the whole process (issues) will be reviewed technically in a legal manner vs being ignored due to back door pay off's!
Eastsidelady wrote on Aug 9, 2008 7:27 AM:
gene wrote on Aug 8, 2008 11:35 PM:
What maroons, They cannot possible live near the bay as most of us opponents do. I doubt they even live in this area.
TIM wrote on Aug 8, 2008 9:19 PM:
A 100-foot tsunami? Where? I want to know both where you heard that drivel, and where on the coast there's been any hint of a tsunami that high (hint: the doubling of typical wave height does not take place in flat, sandy terrain, as is the norm around Coos Bay). I'm not saying that an LNG facility would be a bright idea at Jordan Cove (obviously careful study regarding the REAL impacts of earthquakes or tsunamis would be done)... just saying people on both sides are blindly swinging away at eachother, and need to become educated before they espouse their opinions on such a subject.
I won't hold my breath... regardless of the issues at-hand, there IS a reason why locals aren't really involved in decision processes such as this... they don't know a darn thing.
Gov Ted State leaders wake UP wrote on Aug 8, 2008 6:27 PM:
Oregons tsunami hazard zone is not safe for Lng at Jordan Cove wrote on Aug 8, 2008 6:20 PM:
Finally the . Earthquake Foot tsunami addressed wrote on Aug 8, 2008 6:11 PM:
Common Sense wrote on Aug 8, 2008 5:55 PM:
Anybody that thinks this appeal is not necessary is someone profiting from this SCAM, because a 9.0 earthquake will level this LNG SCAM that sits in the sand & then the 100 foot tidal wave hits it next! Bob Braddocks people are sure workin over time on this issue that needs to be addressed! Bob, the message is clear as the day is long....find another state for your useless California LNG SCAM that Oregon doesn't need or want...
P.S. The "real" Common Sense always uses the word SCAM when talkin about this California LNG issue...
Holly wrote on Aug 8, 2008 5:34 PM:
George B. wrote on Aug 8, 2008 4:25 PM:
Joe Sixpack wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:41 PM:
ronop wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:41 PM:
Joe Sixpack wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:37 PM:
Gene wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:36 PM:
Common Sense wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:24 PM:
U said it Robert wrote on Aug 8, 2008 1:02 PM:
And since nobody has figured out yet that the pipeline its self combined with the county getting paid from the contract they signed with Jordan Cove that would produce a lot of money for the County to hire deputies back, they want us to pay more taxes instead and have no jobs to! All cause there is a one in fifty bazillion chance something might happen theorethically if the conditions are just right maybe.
Yeah its a good idea for us to let Eugene tell us how to live.
Common Sense wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:58 PM:
Interlopers not welcome here wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:42 PM:
ROBERT wrote on Aug 8, 2008 11:50 AM:






The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines