Republicans sent U.S. oil overseas


Sunday, August 03, 2008 | 21 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
The Republicans, John McCain and their corporate benefactors, the oil companies, finally believe they have an issue with which they can hoodwink the public into voting Republican. Given the recent spike in oil prices, they believe they can finally convince the public we should dig up the Alaskan tundra and commence extensive offshore drilling. However, there are certain steps we should take as a nation prior to even considering such action.

People may not be aware that when Congress originally authorized the Alaskan pipeline to deliver North Slope oil to Prince William Sound, the agreement was that all Alaskan oil would be used for domestic purposes. We were not allowed to export Alaskan oil. When Republicans took control of Congress in 1995, they quietly removed the prohibition against the exportation of Alaskan oil. That’s right folks. We are now exporting Alaskan oil to Asia.

At the same time, the Republican Congress was removing the prohibition, oil companies were closing down Western refineries. Our own Sen. Ron Wyden conducted an investigation in the mid-1990s and discovered internal documentation indicating the purpose of exporting oil and closing down the refineries was to jack up prices on the West Coast. It is obvious the oil companies were successful.

The oil companies are sitting on numerous leases, simply refusing to drill. Just a short time ago, the Democrats proposed a “use it or lose it” law that would have mandated the oil companies drill on the leases they already have or forfeit them. That bill failed in the face of unified Republican opposition, which was the course backed by oil companies.

At one time it might have seemed reasonable to open up some drilling off our coasts. In light of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision vastly reducing the damages awarded in the Exxon Valdez case, it would be suicidal to do so, as the oil companies would factor in the potential costs in damages in a lawsuit and determine the cost-benefit analysis would protect them from any real damages should a massive spill occur.

At one time I thought Sen. McCain was a straight shooter. Since winning the Republican nomination, he has flip-flopped on numerous issues including his once principled stand against offshore drilling. It is somewhat pathetic to see him pandering to the far right and further engaging in slimy and reprehensible campaign tactics against Barack Obama.

Sen. McCain has forfeited his credibility and the Republican party has forfeited what credibility its moderate wing once had. As I write this letter, gas prices are beginning to fall. Since Sen. McCain attempted to blame Barack Obama for the spike in gas prices perhaps he might have a few good words for him now that prices are beginning to fall.

I don’t think the American voters are going to be hoodwinked and bamboozled this year. I, like many others, am looking forward to Jan. 20, 2009.

Dave Tilton

Coos Bay
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

The other woman wrote on Sep 2, 2008 10:15 AM:

Since the President dropped the Executive Moratorium and Congress started serious discussion about oil prices, the price of oil has dropped dramatically.

If the Democrats would allow Republican amendments that support drilling you would see both parties support it and the price of oil would drop to a more realistic price, resulting in lower prices at the pump.

Hey wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:48 PM:

Can't we demand that the oil companies un cap the tens of thousands of our wells before we drill and cap more? Prices are being manipulated under bush. Who could question that? People. We need you to seek the truth before you let them enslave us more.

Coos Bay Resident wrote on Aug 20, 2008 8:34 PM:

Read the article and then Vote DEMOCRAT! Sign up at the Democratic HQ in the Pony Village Mall.. Get invovled and volunteer....

Bush Banned Offshore Exploration wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:31 AM:

Bush 41, George H. W. Bush banned offshore oil exploration in 1990. It was president Bill Clinton that opened the Naval Petroleum Reserve with 13.4 billion KNOWN barrels of oil to the oil industry. They drilled 25 wells and capped them.

That Bush 41 was a real radical environmentalist!

Call to action wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:17 AM:

Call Rep. DeFazio (202-225-6416) Demand that he support a comprehensive plan that includes:
* more offshore and Alaskan drilling;
* opening up our vast shale oil reserves
* expanding nuclear energy
* promoting alternative energy

Speaker Pelosi Phone numbers:
202-225-4965 (DC),
415-556-4862 (San Francisco)

jim wrote on Aug 11, 2008 9:53 PM:

radical environmentalists.....ones that would never consider any development or use of natural resources. People seem to think that development is unchecked and not watched. I can tell you from personal experience that the oil industry and their practices in drilling and the effects of those practices as it relates to the environment is CLOSELY monitored. Radical environmentalists have shut down every single opportunity for the Bay Area to grow economically....from lumber to fishing to mining to LNG. The environment can be protected and natural resources utilized safely yet those radicals would have you believe it is not possible. Wrong.

To Paul R wrote on Aug 11, 2008 4:58 PM:

Paul,

It's those kooks in the US Government that are reporting refinery capacity running pretty steady at about 85%. They, in turn, get their info from Big Oil.

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_unc_dcu_nus_m.htm

There's your evidence. It's pretty easy to find other sources of this info, also.

Submedia wrote on Aug 10, 2008 12:30 AM:

Jim, I labeled both parties elitists..because that's what they are.. Obama in his million dollar home and McCain with 500 dollar loafers.. Not one candidate truly cares about you.. ..And I think pretty much everyone anymore is considered an environmentalist.. I mean.. You like clean air, clean water and I'm sure you enjoy the forest.. Well what's left of it that is..

 wrote on Aug 9, 2008 7:14 PM:

VOTE DEMOCRAT! Those of you that are REPUBLICANS come on over to the Democrat side.

PAUL REDLINGSHAFER wrote on Aug 9, 2008 6:02 PM:

On 8-4-08 a statement was made that the oil companies were holding back refineries capacity. Where? Who? When? The left-wing kooks make these claims but there is no evidence to back up their lies.

Jim wrote on Aug 8, 2008 7:03 AM:

yes....lots of leases...but not much OIL there...it isnt everywhere. Also, the reason we don't have refineries is because of leftist environmental wackos. And I had to laff at submedia and the whole "elitist" comment. Who do you think runs the democratic party? elitists! Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, et all havent had to worry a single day where their next meal is coming from. Yeah..they are in touch. Some of you folks need to be.

Submedia wrote on Aug 6, 2008 11:26 AM:

No Choice,

You nailed it! Finally someone speaks words of wisdom! If you truly think that anyone who lives in a million dollar plus home is going to care about all of the poor (which is 60% of Coos County) Then you need to lay off the kool aid.. It's time to elect politicians that come from the common people, Not corporate elitists who will just continute to sell our public lands to timber companies and our oceans off to Oil companies (who will NEVER pass on their profits to you!)

No choice... wrote on Aug 6, 2008 7:49 AM:

I do think Americans are going to be "hoodwinked and bamboozled", because BOTH parties are reps for the corporate elite. Both are CFR members, both are bought and paid for by the corporate banking interests. Wake up, Carters campaign was Change also, and what happened then? Nothing. What will happen now? Nothing. The rich will continue to get richer and the middle class will continue to decline into poverty. But as long was we have American Idol to watch, and the tv media to trust, I guess it will all be ok. Go back to sleep.

Tag Ur It wrote on Aug 5, 2008 10:46 AM:

Oregon should have the right to decide whether private companies can search for potential drilling sites three miles offshore.
You wouldn't even SEE them and it wouldn't be LNG!!!
DRILL HERE, DRILL NOW, PAY LESS!!
AmericanSolutions.com

Check your Facts wrote on Aug 5, 2008 6:55 AM:

To Story Time...maybe you should check out the facts about the Naval Petroleum Reserve....this is NOT ANWR. OIL COMPANIES ALREADY HAVE IT...IT'S IN ALASKA... 13 billion KNOWN barrels of oil underground....only 25 well drilled and then capped.

WHY?...and we are supposed to give them ANWR too. For what?

Story time wrote on Aug 4, 2008 8:44 PM:

Hey Fool, you must be reading the
Daily Kos again, or maybe Geo Soros' or Ariana Huffinton's Socialist agenda papers.
It is well documented that when Republicans sent then-President Bill Clinton a bill to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for oil exploration. Clinton vetoed the bill, saying it would not help America's dependency on foreign oil because it would take ten years for the product to come on line.

plenty of surplus wrote on Aug 4, 2008 10:52 AM:

There is not only a surplus of oil undedr land that is now leased by the oil companies. There is also a surplus of refining capacity at existing refineries. The oil companies have shut down much of their operations at existing refineries in order to push their own profitable agenda, locking up more leases.

Theyre Trying to Fool Us Again wrote on Aug 4, 2008 10:18 AM:

It is my understanding that Bill Clinton opened up the Naval Petroleum Reserve which has 13.4 billion, billion barrels of KNOWN oil reserves. THIS IS NOT ANWR. Oil companies drilled 25 test wells and capped them.

They have the land and the oil. They are sitting on this while they are driving up the price of gas and raking in billions.

All the while using this to fool the American people and win an election. No thanks - no more Republican tricks and talking points.

But......... wrote on Aug 4, 2008 8:15 AM:

McCain supports a ban of domestic oil exports!

How about production wrote on Aug 4, 2008 8:13 AM:

It has been 30 years since our nation built a new refinery, upgrades in our refining capacity are urgently needed.

The rest of the story.. wrote on Aug 4, 2008 8:10 AM:

In 1995, Congress passed legislation allowing oil production in a small fraction of ANWR's 19.6 million acres, yet President Clinton vetoed the bill.

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | BlogThe World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections