Senator wants bike helmets mandatory


Wednesday, July 30, 2008 | 4 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
EUGENE (AP) — A lawmaker from Eugene plans to introduce a bill that would require all bicyclists to wear a helmet.

With high gas prices and environmental concerns pushing more people to two-wheeled transportation, State Sen. Floyd Prozanski, a longtime bicycling advocate, says it’s time to ensure better safety.

Approved 15 years ago, Oregon’s current helmet law only requires riders younger than 17 to wear one. The fine for riding without a helmet is $25.

Several U.S. cities require adults to wear bicycle helmets. But if Prozanski’s plan succeeds, Oregon would be the first state to have an all-ages helmet law.

The Web site BikePortland.org was first to report that Prozanski planned to introduce the helmet bill in the 2009 Legislature. The state’s largest bicycle advocacy group, the Bicycle Transportation Alliance, isn’t waiting until then to oppose it.

An alliance spokesman said the group fears that requiring helmet use on public streets could decrease ridership because adults who don’t want to wear one might choose another mode of travel.

“We support and encourage helmet use,” spokesman Karl Rohde said. “But we do not think a law is the right way to approach it.”

Eugene cyclist Paul Moore agrees, telling The Register-Guard newspaper that motorists are more careful when they get used to sharing the streets with bicycles. The roads will be less safe for those on bicycles, he said, if a strict helmet law inadvertently keeps ridership down.

Moore, who typically wears a helmet, added that they don’t provide all that much protection.

“People think, ’Wear a helmet and you’ll be safe,”’ Moore said. “But it’s not that simple. I know it’s not going to save me in an encounter with an automobile.”

Prozanski, meanwhile, said he doesn’t think a helmet law will stop people from riding bicycles: “I have a real hard time with that one.”
Tags »
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Tony wrote on Jul 31, 2008 9:20 AM:

Yeah, its the Liberals....
Hey Tired, maybe you want to join up with your buddy who shot up that 'liberal' church in Tennessee?
He had a thing for liberals too...they are the new boogieman...for some anyway.

But I will agree that this nanny state mentality on Oregon is getting to be a bit much-but that has nothing to do with liberals...

Bike Rider wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:15 PM:

I think that is a really dumb quote when Moore said that they (the helmets) don't provide all that much protection. As an avid bike rider myself, I do realize that a helmet does not help me from getting my leg cut off. But at the same time, it DOES help my brain from becoming mashed potatoes. Bike helmets can help a lot. Just think about it...

Nick wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:14 PM:

The arguments that both the aforementioned cycling advocacy group and the Eugene cyclist make are absolute idiocy. If the vast minority of cyclists are "too cool" to wear a helmet... let them walk. 90% of cyclists will adapt to the law, and at least 9% will just keep riding without a helmet.

That being said, I don't think there should be a helmet law for adults, because I believe one should have the right to ride without if you want to put yourself at risk. It certainly won't keep cyclists from riding like complete idiots in places like Portland or Corvallis... maybe there should be some emphasis on following the rules of the road, instead of making more legislation?

Henry wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:38 AM:

He should consider enforcing traffic laws that (some) bike riders refuse to obey the rather than making them wear helmets.
Laws, regulations, all that stuff, mean nothing unless 2 things happen:
They are complied with...
or they are enforced


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections