Airport boss sees reason for optimism

By Jo Rafferty, Staff Writer
Friday, July 25, 2008 | 22 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
NORTH BEND —  The manager of North Bend’s airport predicts speedy success for a new coalition aiming to restore service between here and Portland.

“They’re going to work the issue hard,” Executive Director Gary LeTellier said Thursday. “I don’t think this will last more than two weeks.”

Gov. Ted Kulongoski announced Thursday he is organizing a task force of airport, government and business leaders from across the state. The coalition is targeting this fall to secure commitments from airlines for the coming year.

The coalition formed in response to airports losing air service because of fuel prices. The Southwest Oregon Regional Airport learned in late June that Horizon Air would terminate its service to Portland after Oct. 11.

The airline cited fuel costs and the introduction of larger aircraft as its reasons for leaving. It had only enough of these aircraft to place at its larger hub airports.

“The past several weeks have been difficult for air service in Oregon and the airline industry as a whole,” Kulongoski said during a Thursday visit to the Pendleton airport. “However, air service is critical to economic stability and livability in communities all across Oregon and that is why we need to act now and do everything we can to try to preserve air service for these communities.”

The North Bend airport is among those joining the coalition. Others are in Portland, Redmond, Klamath Falls, North Bend, Medford, Eugene, Salem and Pendleton. Like North Bend, Klamath Falls is losing its Horizon Air Portland connection in October.

The coalition’s tasks include:

n Pooling resources and commitments of governments, businesses, organizations and individuals toward retaining commercial air services.

n Securing an agreement for connecting local service to a major air carrier.

n Subsidizing a regional air carrier to mitigate the high costs of fuel and lack of profitability for short-haul-regional air service.

n Creating incentives for regional air carriers to continue serving the Pacific Northwest. Once such incentive might be the operation of maintenance facilities.

“I am confident that by having all of Oregon’s airports work together we can accomplish our goal faster than by working separately,” Kulongoski said. “I believe we can find a commercial air carrier to continue to serve Oregon’s regional airport communities.”

A second airline, SkyWest Airlines, began providing service at the North Bend airport earlier this month, offering two round-trip flights per day to San Francisco. At a Coos County Airport District meeting Thursday night, commissioners asked one other  what they would do if they lost their new carrier, too, and there were no commercial flights left at the airport. Even though the airline has a one-year contract with the airport, there is a possible snag. SkyWest can leave on 30 days’ notice, LeTellier said. But he said there had been no indication of such plans from the airline.

“I know the possibility exists,” he said. “I don’t know of any plans. My sense is SkyWest’s very pleased with their route.”

The other question is whether SkyWest would be allowed to leave. Horizon Air said in its notice of termination that SkyWest’s two round-trip flights to San Francisco would satisfy the “essential air service” requirement for minimal service at the airport.

Any determination would have to be made by the U.S. Department of Transportation, which is expected soon, LeTellier said.

Letters to the department, objecting to Horizon’s termination of service, have been written by airport officials, government agencies, business representatives and individuals.

The cities of North Bend and Coos Bay, the Coquille Indian Tribe, the Airport District and area residents said the community would be isolated without the northbound service. Thursday, two new objections were logged on the Transportation Department Web site, www.regulations.gov, from the South Coast Development Council and the medical director of the blood bank at Bay Area Hospital, Dr. Debra Groom.

“Our hospital facilitates the triaging of blood transfusion products for all five hospitals on the south Oregon coast from Reedsport to Gold Beach,” Groom said in the objection. “All blood products are supplied by the American Red Cross in Portland. The supply of blood products requires more than two flights a day because of the limited expiration date of certain products ... We also need this service to send patient blood samples to Portland for special testing so that appropriate and safe blood products can be selected.”

Driving the eight-hour round trip to Portland, over mountain passes that can close in winter, could put the hospital in a crisis, Groom said.

LeTellier said a meeting with Horizon officials last week was futile.

“We didn’t get what we were seeking,” he said.

Since then, all parties involved discussed the situation in a conference call, LeTellier said.

“There are some communications ongoing now in the state, including with SkyWest and Alaska Air,” he said.

In preparation for the worst — loss of the Portland and even the San Francisco flights — LeTellier said he also has been talking to charter operators.

He admitted that would be the last resort.

“I think our best bet now is working with the state closely,” he said. “We might have success there.”

Coos Bay resident Steve Pickering asked whether commissioners knew about the essential air service contract with Horizon before adding the San Francisco flights.

“Were you aware that allowing another airline in here could let Horizon out of the EAS contract?” he asked.

Chairman Mike Lehman said that at the time the board was talking about acquiring southbound flights, commissioners didn’t know fuel prices would be as high as they are and had no indication that Horizon would ever leave.

LeTellier and the rest of the commissioners, Joe Benetti, Clair Jones, Helen Brunell Mineau and John Briggs, agreed with Lehman.

“In 20 years, Horizon never asked for a subsidy,” Brunell Mineau said. “So, that means they were making money.”

(Staff Writer Jo Rafferty covers Coos County Airport District news for The World. She can be reached by calling 269-1222, ext. 236; or by e-mailing to jrafferty@theworldlink.com.)
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Linus wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:35 AM:

Has any serious study or analysis been conducted that does, in fact, tie these commercial flights to economic development in the area? I know that it's convenient for people, and we all want to have the option of flying to Portland relatively cheap, but the very premise that commercial flights automatically = increased economic activity doesn't seem airtight. Has the local economy improved greatly since 1982, when Horizon began flying here?

As for the charter idea, it seems self-evident to me. We certainly have enough local pilots and planes to pull it off, considering there are two FBO's right nxt to the terminal already (even San Francisco only has one FBO for their entire airport). Why not utilize the wealth of general aviation expertise sitting right here, in the form of local entrepeneurs? "Think globally, act locally" and all that...I think we all know what crying to Horizon and the DOT will accomplish.

Steve P. wrote on Aug 2, 2008 11:11 AM:

Kay,

I volunteered.

Kay wrote on Jul 29, 2008 8:28 PM:

Steve P: who appointed you lunch room monitor?

to Steve P. wrote on Jul 29, 2008 2:14 PM:

I remember some of your comments as being extreme....talk of recall? Recall that?

Give it a rest wrote on Jul 29, 2008 2:02 PM:

Find myself agreeing with Steve P - this is serious business and deserved serious thought. I heard Lehman say, they were aware of EAS issue but, did not think it was at all likely Horizon would pull out. Also heard Brunnel say that in June Horizon was telling her they would say. Knowing about EAS and making what at the time was a reasonable business decision is different than not having a clue about the EAS. Give them a break/

Steve P. wrote on Jul 29, 2008 10:25 AM:

Some of these comments are getting a little extreme, Extreme anything (Right or Left) is not good. Stay focused people. This is a serious issue.

Up In the Air wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:37 PM:

The investment in "owning" an airline is huge. Service checks every 5 days, 'A' checks every 50 days, heavy maintenance that will put an aircraft on the ground 3 weeks every 18 month. Federal Aviation regulations that are unending . In flight recurrent programs. Maintenance programs that take a specific FAA approval process before you can even taxi an aircraft across the ramp let alone fly it.
You would spend at least a full year to become operational. Whether you own 1 aircraft or 500, you are still required to have the exact same regulatory backup structure in place.
Landing and terminal fees at arrival and departure airports. Paying a fee to every county that you overfly. Noise abatement rules, aircraft breaking down and millions in spare parts on hand to fix the problem. The list goes on and on.

Very silly idea.

Up In The Air wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:35 PM:

The investment in "owning" an airline is huge. Service checks every 5 days, 'A' checks every 50 days, heavy maintenance that will put an aircraft on the ground 3 weeks every 18 month. Federal Aviation regulations that are unending and over zealous FAA inspectors looking at every possible way to violate Pilots, Flight attendants and Mechanics.
In flight recurrent programs. Maintenance programs that take a specific FAA approval process before you can even taxi an aircraft across the ramp let alone fly it.
Whether you own 1 aircraft or 500, you are still required to have the exact same regulatory backup structure in place.

Landing and terminal fees at arrival and departure airports. Paying a fee to every county that you overfly. Noise abatement rules, aircraft breaking down and millions in spare parts on hand to fix the problem. The list goes on and on.

Owning and operating an airline is nothing like operating even a railroad.

Very silly idea.

howard wrote on Jul 26, 2008 7:32 AM:

SCRIBBLER, where do you think the building is going when the next 7 plus earthquake? Most geologists expect a 9.1 earthquake. Or how many windows will shatter when there is an explosion at the nearby LNG terminal. If you are fried you wont care. Hopefully the citizens of Coos Bay heard their mayor last week state that the pristine view that arriving passengers get is what they expect of Coos Bay. So why is he supporting the ugly LNG terminal across the channel?

Common Sense wrote on Jul 26, 2008 7:23 AM:

Guess it was too simple to secure long term contacts BEFORE the new airport was built??? Another Oregon special, doing business backwards, so any step forward is a success...

P.S. This situation is almost as pathetic as the Port commission clowns purchasing a rail line!

Scribbler wrote on Jul 25, 2008 7:38 PM:

I'm still wondering why the access to the terminal is so narrow that it could be blocked by a single equipment breakdown.

And why the brackets holding the roof beams are shimmed to fit, instead of being ordered at the proper angle.

And why anybody would build so many windows into a wall subject to a huge amount of sand scouring if the wind blows... on the coast.

taxpayer wrote on Jul 25, 2008 4:44 PM:

so how much would horizon air sell thier Q-200s to the airport district for then at least we would have airplanes for our new terminal when skywest decides to leave im sure the airport commisioners could find the money like a bond leavy nothing new for coos county we are all rich

Kay wrote on Jul 25, 2008 4:18 PM:

c.b.businessman wrote on Jul 25, 2008 3:14 PM:
The Executive Director for the Airport District is doing an excellent job, and, is trying very hard to do what's best for our communities. Keep up the good work Le Tellier. The Commissioners too, except for Briggs and Brunnell, are also doing a great job. Keep up the good work, we all support you and your efforts!

And other than blowing $25,000,000.00 of other peoples' money and now sitting with two empty terminals, exactly what has he done for US?

Gotta give him credit though, I don't know another man who can fanagle that much cash from strangers. He's very good at that. Those cookies go to your head?

everyman wrote on Jul 25, 2008 4:09 PM:

There was once a man with no shoes...

Then he had no feet...


Then he fell down, screaming...

Close the Airport...close the highways...close the port...close the rail lines...and I bet we would still not have a Victoria's Secret in the Mall...

Thomas wrote on Jul 25, 2008 3:37 PM:

"Subsidizing a regional air carrier ..."

The only words worth comment.

So, are we going to have fascism or socialism?

a tax payer wrote on Jul 25, 2008 3:35 PM:

helen's comment about a bussiness not asking for tax payers money means they were making a profit every year is very wrong helen you own a bussiness and know you dont always make a profit if you dont make profit then you ask the tax payer to subidise your privte bussiness how do i get some of the tax payers money for my bussiness

c.b.businessman wrote on Jul 25, 2008 3:14 PM:

The Executive Director for the Airport District is doing an excellent job, and, is trying very hard to do what's best for our communities. Keep up the good work Le Tellier. The Commissioners too, except for Briggs and Brunnell, are also doing a great job. Keep up the good work, we all support you and your efforts!

OBSERVER II wrote on Jul 25, 2008 2:59 PM:

There's a urgent need to dispose of the airport officals immediately , before they can do any more damage.Tax payers need to stand up to these double talking heathins,and replace them ,NOW.They can't be trusted as they have already soon.

Howard Jarvis here wrote on Jul 25, 2008 1:49 PM:

Commenter "A Taxpayer" posting was in jest; but not far off target. What this area needs are leaders with innovative thought. It may be a prudent investment for the people of Oregon to own an airline. If the people will be subsidizing a private company such as Skywest or Horizon, why not subsidize for a year the peoples airline. It could be a public company with shareholders. It could service North Bend, Klamath, Astoria, Eugene, into the Portland hub. Three aircraft would be plenty for a couple daily flights, four would add a safety net in the event of unanticipated AOG experiences. Relatively new and inexpensive, smaller, twin turbine aircraft with recently retired, many hour stick time pilots, would make lots of money for the people.

den wrote on Jul 25, 2008 1:39 PM:

You ask them about an orange, and they tell you the apple is blue. Not a streight answer, Why? Politicians on these boards, are there not, any real people who want to serve, the type, that call a foot wound, a foot wound?

Coos Bay resident Steve Pickering asked whether commissioners knew about the essential air service contract with Horizon before adding the San Francisco flights.

“Were you aware that allowing another airline in here could let Horizon out of the EAS contract?” he asked.

Chairman Mike Lehman said "that at the time the board was talking about acquiring southbound flights, commissioners didn’t know fuel prices would be as high as they are and had no indication that Horizon would ever leave."

LeTellier and the rest of the commissioners, Joe Benetti, Clair Jones, Helen Brunell Mineau and John Briggs, agreed with Lehman.

Folks, That is what we pay the Airport boss for, EAS contract rules. Its our representatives job to check to see who is minding the house? They put money asside for more raises, guess who? Everyone just got a cost of living increase of 3.2 Percent. Not sure aboutl the Boss.

Howard jarvis wrote on Jul 25, 2008 1:33 PM:

Two weeks. Add those comments by LeTellier to the unkept promises of local politicians and revisit them in a month.

a taxpayer wrote on Jul 25, 2008 11:19 AM:

why doesnt the airport buy a airline like we are trying to buy a railroad and use some more of our tax dollars


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections