Charlie Tuna suspects appear in court

By Jessica Musicar, Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 | 11 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
COQUILLE — They’ve already apologized to its keeper. And Tuesday, the two young men involved in the dismemberment of one large wooden fish went to the Coos County Courthouse to face a judge and arraignment on criminal mischief charges.

Mark Santos, 21, and Marvin Terry Jr., 20, appeared before Judge Michael Gillespie. Both are charged with second-degree criminal mischief. The class A misdemeanor is punishable by up to one year in jail and a $6,250 fine.  The judge entered not-guilty pleas for the two, who are scheduled to appear in court for a change of plea hearing at 8:30 a.m. on Sept. 2.

The Coos Bay men’s charges stem from the May theft of the Charlie the Tuna statue that once sat on east side of the South Slough Bridge, where it welcomed people to Charleston. Coos County Sheriff’s deputies found two men chopping the 8-foot tall blue tuna statue in the Daniel’s Creek area on June 6 and subsequently arrested suspects Santos and Terry.

Several days later, the roommates wrote a letter of apology published in The World, explaining the incident was a prank gone wrong. In the letter, they said someone found Charlie. In a panic, they tried, unsuccessfully, to move the statue from its hiding place and instead chose to chop him up. Santos also apologized to Mel Campbell, a Charleston Merchants Association member.

Campbell did not attend Tuesday’s hearing.

According to an indictment charging the defendants, on or about June 6, they unlawfully and intentionally damaged the wood statue, which belonged to the community of Charleston. Coos County Sheriff’s Office deputies recovered the statue, but only after it was cut into pieces with a chainsaw.

During the hearing, the men showed a lack of understanding about the court process, which drove Gillespie to explain to them why they might need an attorney. He then assigned them separate counsel.

Defense attorney Megan Jacquot will represent Terry and an attorney from the Southwestern Oregon Public Defenders Services Inc. in Coos Bay will defend Santos.

Despite jokes from the judge, who warned them to “Stay away from wooden statues,” Santos and Terry didn’t seem to find the situation humorous.

“It’s not really funny at all,” Santos told Gillespie.

After the hearing, Santos explained the prank lost its charm when they had to cut it up.

“It just got out of our hands,” he said.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Tom wrote on Jul 29, 2008 9:26 AM:

Like I said when this first happened, a thief is a thief no matter who they are. These two creeps would not have said " I sorry" if they had not have got caught. the only thing worse than a thief is ANOTHER thief. And these two slimball are thieves no matter how you look at it. If they would steal something like that stupid wood fish, they would not hesitate to steal most anything. TO THE TWO SLIME BALLS THIEVES...Move somewhere else we don't want your kind living here, and do it ASAP

Sarah wrote on Jul 21, 2008 12:51 AM:

I agree with "My Thoughts" you said it very well

Debra Cade wrote on Jul 20, 2008 9:08 AM:

Stupid and sad.........

not sure wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:45 AM:

Did they admit to stealing it, or just destroying it? There is a difference here in regards to the law.

NVNV wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:12 AM:

Their attire should tell you all you need to know about them...

CURIOUS wrote on Jul 16, 2008 5:42 PM:

Just curious if these two poachers had fishing licenses and why they weren't cited for other offenses also.It seems their getting off pretty easy,they should take their lumps and more forward.ATTORNEYS? FOR WHAT? LOL>>>>>>> You will do better without the PUBLIC PRETENDERS OFFICE.BEWARE......

My Thoughts wrote on Jul 16, 2008 4:26 PM:

I think they should both be found guilty and have that added to their record. They should be given probation of say 3 months and restitution of say $3,000 each. That money should go to promote Charleston are merchants in local publications and such

COOS OBSERVER wrote on Jul 16, 2008 3:51 PM:

They already admitted to the crime,so why not just plead guilty and save tax payers some money,and pay their dues.It seems the judge is trying to generate more tax payers money for court appointed attorney from the OREGON PUBLIC PRETENDERS OFFICE.Good luck MR. Santos.

COOS BAY RESIDENT wrote on Jul 16, 2008 2:33 PM:

Since when do circuit court judges enter pleas for defendents? MY BAD these guys are not the brightest bulbs in the box!!

Just An Observer wrote on Jul 16, 2008 12:58 PM:

How do you plead "not guilty" to something you already apologized for? It would have been better to work out some sort of plea agreement and move on instead of waste more time and money on the case.

just me wrote on Jul 16, 2008 12:15 PM:

So, are these two "gentlemen" going to get away with breaking the law like so many others who repeatedly show up in these reports?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections