Port applies to buy rail line for $9.8M

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 | 15 comment(s)

Deal hinges on ownership of additional CORP stations

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COOS BAY — The Oregon International Port of Coos Bay wants to purchase the Coos Bay rail line. But the agency wants more track than what Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad is ready to abandon.

In its feeder line application to the U.S. Surface Transportation Board, the port said it is willing to purchase the embargoed line for $9.8 million. It will only do so if it gains ownership of three stations at the eastern end of the line that CORP has expressed no interest in letting go.

In earlier filings with the STB, CORP said it would abandon the line from milepost 669, near Vaughn, to milepost 763, near Cordes on the North Spit, while discontinuing service on the line out to Coquille, which is owned by Union Pacific.

CORP’s existing holdings extend about 17 miles farther east, serving stations in Noti, Veneta and Danebo. It is this stretch of line that the port views as critical to making acquisition of the line economically viable.

Three shippers, Swanson Lumber and Swanson Brothers in Noti; and Roseboro in Vaughn, generated approximately 970 and 758 carloads of freight in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Based upon port estimates, this traffic generated $454,800 and $582,000 of gross revenue for CORP. And in a letter of support of the port’s application, Swanson said it could ship up to 1,200 carloads a year, or about $720,00 gross revenue by port estimates.

If CORP were allowed to keep the easternmost 17 miles of track, the port argues it would reduce transportation efficiency.

“CORP’s continued ownership of the eastern part of the Line would constitute a ‘steel barrier,’ meaning that CORP could extract various handling charges for the movement of traffic over its segment,” the port wrote.

The port also wants the STB to order CORP to make repairs to railroad tunnels or at least provide compensation. When CORP closed traffic on the line in September 2007, it cited safety risks in three of the line’s nine tunnels.  Yet, the port contends the railroad company knew about the problems long before the closure. Studies were performed in 1994 and 2004, the port said, that indicated the severity of the tunnel problems.

“The necessary repairs represent the deferred maintenance that CORP should have been doing over the past 13 years,” the port wrote. “[T]he Board should not allow CORP to simply wash its hand of the line, ignoring the future hardship that will be incurred by the local communities as they try to restore rail service.”

The port did not suggest how much it would cost to repair the line, though previous estimates came to $23 million.

The port would pay much less to gain ownership of the line.

The suggested purchase price is based on estimates of the line’s track assets coupled with the underlying land’s real estate value.

The port has said it would purchase the line and then find a railroad operator to provide service over it. Portland & Western Railroad, RailServe, and Yreka Western Railroad Co. have expressed interest in that role, the application indicated. The port said it could have an operator on contract before the STB makes a ruling on the line, and reopen railroad operations on or about Jan 1, 2009.

CORP issued a notice of intent to abandon the line to the STB in June. It suggested the principal reason for abandonment was lack of revenue, with safety concerns secondary.

CORP submitted an abandonment application Monday, but it was unavailable on the STB’s Web site. World attempts to contact CORP officials were unsuccessful.

(Staff Writer Alexander Rich covers Port of Coos Bay issues for The World. He can be reached by calling 269-1222, ext. 234; or by e-mailing to arich@theworldlink.com.)
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Tear it up wrote on Jul 21, 2008 8:42 AM:

MSWANS~
The line closed in September. None of those things were occurring when it was open. I love your optimistic viewpoint but your should try viewing the situation through a realistic lens. If you want to encourage new business start cutting the red tape that is the real hindrance to our development. There are myriad of problems well beyond the rail line. Growth and expansion in this town are always fought against tooth and nail by not only the municipalities, but by the state, and private groups all around. If there was a plan to show the viability of the rail you may hear more optimistic responses but they are just spitting into the wind.

mswans wrote on Jul 18, 2008 11:13 AM:

To all the nay sayers, how do you expect the economy of the Coos Bay area to grow if you cannot move raw materials in, and finished products out? By truck? At todays fuel prices, thats laughable. The Ports interests lie in keeping business and attracting new ones to the area, which keep people working, and yes paying taxes. But guess what, without taxes government and society grind to a halt as well as progress. Quit thinking of just yourselves and open your eyes to the big picture. Everyone can benefit from this, especially if the Port handles it correctly and gets the right businesses to move into the area, due to there being rail transportation available.

Resident wrote on Jul 16, 2008 5:23 PM:

To Wonder--You're so right!

I wonder wrote on Jul 16, 2008 12:24 PM:

Does this mean the Port is going to fix the tunnels that the present rail co. will not fix because of the expense? Where does our Port think they are going to get so much money. Everyone in Coos County will lose their homes to unpaid taxes the way our leaders are spending, spending, spending tax dollars. Nobody can buy gas now, let alone pay higher taxes for all the things our idiots are buying and paying for around here. No body is working and the pay is low for the ones who are working, and no new jobs at all coming in, and our leaders just keep on spending. I am sure glad our "leaders" around here are so rich, but please don't think the rest of us are. QUIT SPENDING MONEY 'WE' DON'T HAVE.

Tear it up wrote on Jul 16, 2008 10:47 AM:

DJ~ Why do you think, "there is literally no one else willing to pony up"? It is because it is not a viable option. If it was, private business would be lining up to CAPITALIZE on the OPPORTUNITY. The companies that actually deal in this sort of venture have all turned their backs to it because they feel that it is not a sound business move, right? If it is not viable for private business what makes the port feel like they can make it work? It is because they have no accountability and a tax base to draw from. Shifting poor investment to the citizens is not a role of the gov'ment federal or local. Like M said, isn't there a better use of $9.8 million? It seems like there is. Or here is a novel idea, how about SAVING money? Personally, I feel like this would end up like our new airport. Paid for on the citizens dime, now no planes (in this case trains). How about making the companies that would stand to benefit from the rail step up?

Resident wrote on Jul 16, 2008 10:24 AM:

I feel smothered by all the taxes for all the services I don't use. Why do we keep buying private operations with government funds?

Bonnie wrote on Jul 16, 2008 9:22 AM:

My thanks to Alexander Rich for keeping me informed on this matter. I would like to see Yreka Western RR operate this line and wish them success in their endeavors.

m wrote on Jul 16, 2008 8:58 AM:

tear it up: I agree with you on developing the bayfront and tearing up the unused waste of space (rail tracks). However, preserving old buildings is good for tourism and aesthetics. To my knowledge most of the buildings along the bay aren't historical- I wouldn't shed a tear it they were demolished. Why doesn't the port spend the 9.8 million to spruce up the facade of the town instead?

Tear it up wrote on Jul 15, 2008 4:19 PM:

The rail has been left for dead so now the port wants to buy it? They should tear up the rail and renovate the downtown and hwy 101 sections of town. The rail limits access to the most attractive property in the county. Instead of spending and spending to save these old dilapidated buildings we should look to providing for the future of this community and encourage new modern buildings capable of supporting business and growth. Highway 101 is one of the most beautiful drives in the country until you come through coos bay and north bend. Why? The bayfront and downtowns are sad and obsolete. There is nothing to make a person (tourist or otherwise) want to stop and enjoy the community that I and many other have come to love. The idea of saving every old building (North Bend Hotel) in town is laughable. What business can thrive in buildings like that? None. Saving history is great and well, but hindering the growth of a community to hold onto fading parts of the past helps nobody.

Resident wrote on Jul 15, 2008 4:11 PM:

Ridiculous!

Ron wrote on Jul 15, 2008 1:39 PM:

It is really nice to see the Port of Coos Bay step up and act as a catalyst in an attempt to return rail service to our area. Someone needs to keep this pot stirring! Hooray for the Port of Coos Bay.

DJ wrote on Jul 15, 2008 12:51 PM:

Let's get this straight, once and for all: We need this line out of CORP's hands. Period. So let's all tow the line and help someone, anyone, do it! It is our ONLY hope of getting the line up and running again. This will help local business that use the line and save our highways from excessive truck traffic. So think positive and help the Port get the line, first out of CORP's hands, and then see if we can help get someone to get it up and running again. Common sense dictates that we get this property, once and for all into local hands. Common sense says let's give the Port a fair chance to do it, since there is literally no one else willing to pony up. Common sense will cause local caring folks to line up behind this effort to help the local economy. The nay sayers can take a hike.

neutral wrote on Jul 15, 2008 12:35 PM:

Please do not denigrate the Port in their attempts to help local users of the rail line. At the same time, I hope the Port does not ask the county tax payers to pay for this new venture. Property owners in the county do not have deep pockets and we should not be regarded as an unlimited source of dollars. Please look to other sources for funding.

Holly wrote on Jul 15, 2008 12:14 PM:

Too bad we don't have a comedy club here. Our "leaders" would keep the stand-up comics in fresh material daily! The only cost, of course, is to us taxpayers . . .

Common Sense wrote on Jul 15, 2008 11:36 AM:

Gotta love this situation, the Port has ZERO $$$ (Keeps raising fees for fishermen & alike), but is now gonna buy a rail line! Another SCAM of a plan to waste tax payers $$$, instead of having an outside of the state buying it! I guess the Port commissioners will NEVER learn on their pathetic pie in the sky dreams that always turn out the same old way as the GREAT old saying fits them so well...Wish in one hand & what do you get in the other?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections