Feds’ vote on LNG could come Thursday


Saturday, July 12, 2008 | 1 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
PORTLAND (AP) — Federal officials could vote as early as next week on the proposed Bradwood Landing liquefied natural gas terminal near the mouth of the Columbia River.

To the surprise of Oregon interests and the developer, the terminal is on the agenda for Thursday’s meeting of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Washington, D.C.

Gov. Ted Kulongoski criticized the haste. Environmentalists said the commission is trying to whisk energy proposals into the out basket before the Bush administration expires.

“This is more of the same,” said Anna Richter Taylor, a spokeswoman for the governor. “FERC continues to move forward without regard for Oregon’s concerns.”

The commission has rejected Kulongoski’s request for a revamped environmental analysis.

“FERC is looking more like a kangaroo court every day,” said Brent Foster, executive director of the environmental group Columbia Riverkeeper. “They want to get this approved before the Bush administration leaves office, but they’re just bumbling their way through it and making it much easier to legally challenge.”

Spokesman Joe Desmond of NorthernStar Natural Gas Inc. of Houston said it was a surprise to see the project on the agency’s agenda so soon. Only on Monday, the company responded to the agency’s questions about how it would offset damage to the environment and endangered species such as salmon.

Desmond said the commission may do one of three things: address a procedural issue, ask questions of its staff, or vote on the project.

The commission has five members, all presidential appointees. Its agenda lists a two-hour session on Bradwood Landing. Under its rules, Thursday is the earliest date it could vote on the project.

Desmond said approval of Bradwood landing would be contingent on NorthernStar satisfying other federal agencies and the state government, which administers clean air, clean water and coastal zone management rules.

“We can’t break ground on the project until we satisfy all the conditions,” Desmond said. “It will take time to do that.”

The terminal would warm imported gas that has been cooled and condensed for shipment on tankers. Once processed, the gas would go into the regional pipeline system.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Joe Front wrote on Jul 14, 2008 9:13 AM:

Who cares? LNG import terminal makes no economic sense. Why are the opponents getting their nickers in a twist for a project that is never going to get built? And if it does, maybe we could use the tanks for fish farming as there is never going to be any LNG going in them! (fyi, US gas price >$10/mmbtu, Asia gas price - 16% of JCC or $20+ - where is the gas going...to the West Coast to lose $10/mmbtu???)


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections