Repair? Scrap? CB building's fate is uncertain

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 | 11 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
The city of Coos Bay has declared a two-story downtown office building substandard, paving the way for its repair or demolition.

The Lockhart Building, at 335 Central Ave., is empty and in disrepair. Its green awnings are covered in mold and several windows have been boarded. White paint is peeling from exterior walls. The storefronts are empty, except for some extension cords littering the floors and old business signs etched on the windows.

City Manager Chuck Freeman said the city received a letter from Keith Riley Architects in 2001 indicating the building was substandard. Since then, attempts to get the property owner to improve the building have been made, but to no avail. Freeman decided to force the issue because of liability concerns.

“All our downtown buildings are an interest to us,” Freeman said. “We have a building that’s substandard. The issue has got to be addressed.”

Barry Hardman, the city’s building inspector, did just that. On June 23, he posted a “Danger” notice in one of the building’s windows. The chief problem is with the roof system, he said, which does not provide sufficient support. The city is under the impression unapproved alterations were made at some point to the 95-year-old building. That included the removal of about half the roof joists.

“We assumed someone went in and altered the structure,” Hardman said.

Hardman said it is at risk of collapsing, with one floor pancaking on top of another all the way to the ground.

According to the Coos County Assessor’s Office, Gary Mountain, of Campbell, Calif., purchased the property in 2005 for $215,000.

Jim Hossley, Coos Bay’s director of public works, said Mountain spoke to the city about his plans to upgrade the building shortly thereafter, but never provided written blueprints.

“They were all verbal” plans, Hossley said.

Mountain now has until Aug. 1 to present a structural engineer’s report that the building is safe or else present a plan to upgrade the building. If these steps are not taken, the city could declare the building dangerous and require its occupants to vacate it within 30 days. That would only affect one business, Hair Co. Etc. Salon & Day Spa, the last remaining tenant.

If the city gets no response, it could declare the building a public nuisance and have it demolished.

Hardman said the city has had trouble contacting Mountain. City staff have not talked to him directly for some time, relying instead on a maintenance worker and the owner of Hair Co. Etc. to pass word on to Mountain.

The city’s declaration comes as somewhat of a surprise to Matt Miller, one of several investors who thought their money would be used to refurbish the building and help spur economic growth.

The Cupertino, Calif., man said he invested “many thousands of dollars” with Mountain in 2005. He is disappointed to hear nothing of the sort has taken place.

Mountain did not return calls to his cell phone. His Campbell business phone number has been disconnected or is no longer in service.

Hardman said the city had great hopes Mountain would renovate the Lockhart Building rather than have it demolished.

“The city wants people to step forward to take responsibility for their buildings,” he said.

(Staff Writer Alexander Rich covers Coos Bay issues for The World. He can be reached by calling 269-1222, ext. 234; or by e-mailing to arich@theworldlink.com.)
Briefly


What: On June 23, the city of Coos Bay declared the Lockhart Building substandard.


Why: Built in 1913, the building has fallen into disrepair. The city believes the building is in danger of collapsing, due in part to removal of roof trusses.


What’s next: The owner, Gary Mountain, has until August to respond to the city or the building will be declared dangerous and vacated within 30 days.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

WOW wrote on Jul 10, 2008 10:54 AM:

CB Lifer:
You stated you were tired of people complaining and the complainers should leave?
Well, weren't you just complaining about the complainers yourself? When are you leaving?

ID GLADY MOVE wrote on Jul 10, 2008 10:05 AM:

To CB LIFER....residents and voters like you are part of the problem with Coos & North Bend, you are perfectly happy living in a town that is falling apart. You can't see the dirt, grime, mold and poverty all around you. You are blind to the blight that is Coos County. You probably are one of those people that wear their pajamas around town as well.....classy
P.S. I dont like it here and I am moving from this dump!!!!

Roger wrote on Jul 10, 2008 10:00 AM:

What a lie. When did Keith Riley in 2001 say this building was substandard? Thats false information.

The fact is the cities building inspector and manager at that time both inspected that building in 2001. They wrote a report stating the building was substandard and needed to be closed down.

Of course when the information got into other hands it was "forgotten" and never addressed again until now.

Maybe the city manager needs to be talked to a bit more? If I was duped into buying that that building I would be pursuing legal action right now.

A little to late wrote on Jul 10, 2008 9:45 AM:

I feel bad for the new owner, he should sue the City, his realtor, the owners of the building and anyone else involved in this scam.

The city knew perfectly well in 2001 that the building was substandard and even addressed it back then. But quickly the substandard issue was all swept under the table, never mentioned again because of who owned it, their connections and $$$ of course.

Gunpowder Lead wrote on Jul 10, 2008 9:20 AM:

Both towns have idiots, both towns have no money. Why? Due to the fact NO ONE wants change, doesn't want to clean up so that these towns, and bring more people, new things, and jobs to the area. These towns have been dying and continue to die, and no one in there right mind want to spend money here. Why ? Cause people what to keep the area as is... Depressed and Trashy. And when they get money they spend it, on things that later don't get taken care of.
There are buildings in BOTH cities that need money to fix and bring up to code, but no one wants to spend the money and the tax players aren't going to pay for it. they pay for enough stupid things.

CB lifer wrote on Jul 9, 2008 7:16 PM:

Wow, you bragging there "Bay Area Idiots"? You braggin' yer an idit? Geez, if you don't like the people here, or the way things are done, MOVE THE H____ OUT!! I am so sick of idiots complaining, get out if you don't like it.

CB wrote on Jul 9, 2008 3:13 PM:

Boy thats the truth, all idiots in both cities, can't get anything done but have studies done by out of town firms to tell us what to do with our towns. Put your own heads together and come up with a plan you idiots that run the cities and the county too.

Citizen wrote on Jul 9, 2008 3:03 PM:

This isn't the only building in the down town that is a safety concern. Look around and you'll see one building where corners are beginning to collapse. The street is moving near it's foundation also. Liquifaction wasn't a concern when most of these building went it. Large truck traffic over the years has caused a settling to occur. Looks like we inheritied a money pit.

Gene wrote on Jul 9, 2008 1:35 PM:

Another person scammed. When will the justice department ever get enough people on staff to stop this kind of activity. It would be interesting to find out how much was gathered from "investors" by Mr. Mountain.

Eddir wrote on Jul 9, 2008 1:25 PM:

Yeah, well, at least Coos Bay is "working the problem" and has a schedule.

If this were North Bend, their leadership would be wrestling with the idea of passing ordinances requiring others to copy the same sad state of disrepair.

bay area idiots wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:44 AM:

If you put the brains of building enforcement folks from the cities of CB and NB together, would it even amount to one brain? that worked?

SEVEN YEARS!!! seven years ago it was deemed substandard.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections