Detention center seeks state help

By Jolene Guzman, Staff Writer
Monday, July 07, 2008 | 4 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COQUILLE — Juvenile detention teacher Michael Minks went into work one April morning this year and found several of his students were gone.

The agencies that had placed them with the Coos County Juvenile Detention Center took them away. They were afraid the center would close. Rumors and talk about funding constraints plaguing the county’s budget fanned those fears.

Two weeks ago, Minks stood before the Coos County commissioners. He asked for help now and in the years to come. Minks, like many other employees, was not sure what the budget had in store for the juvenile department, but he did know was the money crunch was hurting kids who need help.

The state may be able to answer the call for help.

The Governor’s Task Force on Federal Forest Payments has recommended the OYA aid struggling counties by contracting with county detention centers to place teenagers who would go to juvenile correctional facilities elsewhere.

“This plan could be mutually beneficial by bringing funding to programs such as YCC and OYA with more placement options,” Minks said in a letter to the commissioners.

And it would save jobs.

But first, the county must keep the detention center  and a youth care center programs running, said David Jennings, a representative of the local chapter of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. He feels that would put the county in a better position to get the state’s business. Other counties will be in competition for those slots, Jennings said.

Two years of insecurity over the loss of federal timber payments has had a ripple effect in the juvenile department.

Last year, the department cut five employees. Earlier this year, department staff feared significant budget cuts would force them to close the center.

Anticipating a closure, Curry County and other entities removed kids they had in the detention center. Even the Oregon Youth Authority eased back. It has a contract with the center to run a Youth Care Center, a 90-day program in which juvenile offenders spend time in counseling and working toward a high school diploma or General Education Development certificate, but that too has seen no referrals since mid-April.

The 2008-09 county budget does now include funding to keep the detention center open. But in June, Juvenile Department Director Janet Evans resigned, saying funding uncertainty was the main reason she took a position in another county.

A temporary law enforcement tax levy, proposed by Coos County District Attorney R. Paul Frasier and Sheriff Andy Jackson could provide funding. Jennings said he supports the effort, but it may be a tough sell to voters.

“You have to make a really good case,” he said.

Coos County Commissioner Nikki Whitty has met with local OYA representatives to review the state’s contract. Though there have been no recent placements, the county still has $38,000 — less than half of the negotiated amount—  to pay for placements. The contract pays about $75 per child per day, Whitty said. With a year remaining and more than half of the funding spent, Whitty wants more OYA to consider providing  more money.

“We were using up the allotment, putting more kids in than originally planned,” she said.

Whitty also is crunching numbers in another way.

She wants to re-evaluate the juvenile department to improve efficiency. The department also has contracts with the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon State Parks to provide work crews for a fee. Whitty is exploring how to maximize that revenue. She said she would rather keep detention running than have to close and send kids to a center out of the county. The department would save on operating costs, but spent more time and money transporting youth.

“It could be done, I suppose. But it would be better if we could work it out,” Whitty said.

Jennings said ultimately, if the idea is to reduce the chance youth placed in detention will return, the department must have a detention center close to relatives or guardians. Visits and joint counseling sessions are much easier when the detention center is close to home.

“If there is a need — and I think there is — you want to use it,” he said.

(Staff Writer Jolene Guzman covers Coos County. She can be reached by calling 269-1222, ext. 235; or by e-mailing to jguzman@theworldlink.com.)
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Coos County Citizen wrote on Jul 14, 2008 9:09 PM:

"Maipulated" no more doesn't understand juvenile crime or detention.

Juvenile Detention holds dangerous offenders. Their release would put the community at risk.

As for "cost effective alternatives". The state of Oregon cut juvenile lock-ups in the early 1980's in a mis-guided effort to save dollars. Youth crime increased until the state and many counties, including Coos added secure beds for juvenile offenders. In the end there were no savings but many innocent people were victimized.

A "Regionalizing Detention" wouild ship kids and jobs out of the county. Transport costs would eat up most if not all of the savings, as the World's recent editorial states. These kids are best treated in our community where they are close ot their families.

maipulated no more wrote on Jul 8, 2008 8:22 PM:

What would be the cost savings at regionalizing detention? How can you justify the costs to the citizens when you are letting serious criminals out of jail? Instead of just making an emotional plea, there should be a demand for more information. How can there be claims that the state did not put kids in the program because of cuts.. if the program is still up and running. What happened in APril? Tell the whole story, and if you dont know find out before telling a sad story to encourage the tax payers to pay more.HOw many kids are held in the facility? where were the other cuts to the department made? Are there cost effective alternatives to detention? What has other counties done without detention in their communities? I am certain the staff in detention want to keep their jobs, but so did the other 100 people who lost theirs last year. I would like to know how the county is making decisions about the cuts to balance the budget. IS it just who puts on the most pressure?

Concerned Coos County Citizen wrote on Jul 8, 2008 6:20 PM:

I want to commend the World and Ms. Guzman for her excellent story. I, for one, know that Juvenile Detention is one of those services we absolutely need to keep here in our County. It seems that Commissioner Whitty is the only Commissioner fighting to keep this tool available for erring kids in our County. I'm sure it would cost more $ to send some of these children in other places, including the state or other counties. I for one think the Federal Government needs to give enough Timber lands back to the Counties to support themselves and the services they furnish. If those lands were not public and producing revenue we wouldn't be in the pickle we are in.

Hurry for Commissioner Whitty for leading the County in this endeavor!

So what are we saving the forests for wrote on Jul 8, 2008 7:50 AM:

Federal payments to timber counties were authorized when regulations forced cutbacks in timber harvests.
Can the public really be convinced that allowing counties to raise revenue through what's known as
"local option levies" is a good investment?
Oregon voter-approved initiatives, are the only way counties can boost tax revenue.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections