Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
A Perplexed Employee wrote on Jul 23, 2008 10:44 AM:
I welcome the outcome of that investigation, and our great hope is that the truth will be revealed, and that justice will prevail -- whichever way it may fall.
So much for the armchair theorists.
Just another happy one wrote on Jul 23, 2008 6:24 AM:
I do not think this issue exists because of poor communication on the part of Dr. Hansen. I think this happened because certain employees have poor listening skills and no ethics.
Dave wrote on Jul 22, 2008 2:40 PM:
I say put up or shut up. The "revolution" is over. Good Times just can't step back and be an adult about this.
Let's get out of the immature mode of fault finding (which is easy) and put our minds on decent track and help in positive ways.
Nit-picking is the immature's way of sounding well-versed, when they only do a tiny amount of isolated research in order to throw mud at decent folk. Enough already, for sure.
Give Hansen a raise.
Tony Capo wrote on Jul 21, 2008 1:52 PM:
Here We Go Again wrote on Jul 21, 2008 12:57 PM:
A Perplexed Employee wrote on Jul 21, 2008 11:32 AM:
This is the second time within the past year that, after numerous interviews, the search for a candidate to fill this VP position has failed.
Certainly makes a person wonder why.
Tony Capo wrote on Jul 21, 2008 5:34 AM:
Tony - This doesn't have anything to do with slowing...
Then why didn’t you just start by explaining a budget process and “tax anticipation notes” or “grant anticipa-
tion notes” to everyone instead of trying to lay a slime trail with innuendo and start another baseless rumor. Stop the low-life tactics.
And just why does Harry Abel want to give College money to the City of Coos Bay?
Good Times wrote on Jul 19, 2008 8:33 AM:
The budget needed to be redone. The budget for the new year looks better now because of that. It's not great, but it is better than what was originally turned in.
Tony Capo wrote on Jul 18, 2008 5:24 PM:
So is the community aware that the college is borrowing money..."
Oh my oh my! Why, why did Harry Abel slow the budget process down so long! Why, why? And why does he want to give College money to the City of Coos Bay!
Good Times wrote on Jul 18, 2008 11:51 AM:
Gee Whiz wrote on Jul 16, 2008 6:23 PM:
If students are being driven away it is because of negative people like you who are digging but calling it nuts and bolts. Do our students a favor and go back to school. You have no idea what realism is.
we almost had a music department wrote on Jul 16, 2008 3:53 PM:
Ron wrote on Jul 16, 2008 1:23 PM:
Of course it is. Her supporters tend to be the more calm reasoned types who are more able to see through the backroom revolutionaries mentioned elsewhere here.
The gullible fools who fall for the posturing of the "revolution" usually cannot stay the course and will end up leaving the back-room losers high, dry, and exposed.
Dr. Hansen is nothing if not a patient professional who has been given a dirty job and is doing it well. Her supporters will not leave her and have far more influence in the end than shallow fault-finders.
Dr. Hansen stays - it is a forgone conclusion. Let's pin a medal on her and get back to things that actually need our attention rather than falling for the broken ideas of trouble-makers who grow more isolated every day.
Check your facts wrote on Jul 16, 2008 7:27 AM:
We are really digging now aren't we?
We almost had a music department wrote on Jul 15, 2008 4:19 PM:
Tony Capo wrote on Jul 14, 2008 6:31 PM:
Interesting discussion!...”
Good post, so is the non-truncated one: http://www.theworldforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=462
(continued on forum)
Too funny and sad wrote on Jul 13, 2008 9:15 PM:
drfugawe wrote on Jul 13, 2008 2:22 PM:
It's not surprising, therefore, that the college board should emphasize hiring a replacement who had the exact opposite strengths. And it's also not surprising that Dr. Hansen should find herself among a staff of some very unhappy members.
Often, a new exec will avoid a long drawn out period of organizational correction by "cleaning house". But in today's public protectionist environments, this is simply impossible - and the painful process moves forward. It's obvious that this is happening now.
If I were a member of the SWOC Board, I'd pay little/no attention to this external hub-bub, but instead, I'd attend to the expectations agreed to by Dr. Hansen and the Board - that's what's important!
Danielle wrote on Jul 10, 2008 2:54 PM:
Alice wrote on Jul 10, 2008 12:01 PM:
Alice D wrote on Jul 10, 2008 11:27 AM:
Life may be a bit better after.
I sleep at night wrote on Jul 9, 2008 5:55 PM:
Danielle wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:17 AM:
Alice D wrote on Jul 8, 2008 7:48 PM:
Annita B. wrote on Jul 7, 2008 5:37 PM:
So, writing "quickly on a Blackberry" is the noveau excuse?? If you can't do it right, doing it badly is still unacceptable. Poor grammar, bad spelling, and all on a Blackberry.... my, oh my, will wonders never cease? Or, rather, will the village idiot still continue to scream equal intellect?
DJ wrote on Jul 7, 2008 10:01 AM:
John wrote on Jul 6, 2008 1:28 AM:
My advice to you is, before you attack other people who have been put positions above you (whether they have degrees or not), ask yourself if you have equal or greater merit when it comes to performing the job at hand? To answer this question, I suggest that you re-read your post on this thread with an eye toward spotting spelling and grammatical errors.
Scratching my head wrote on Jul 4, 2008 8:46 AM:
Speasl and others like him are unhappy because their well placed smooch didnt work with Dr. Hansen as it did with Kridelbaugh.
Get over yourselves!
One More Happy Employee wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:50 PM:
Concerned Resident wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:13 PM:
This controversy has broken the faith of many hard working student oriented employees working at SOCC. If they were to just close their eyes and pretend that everything is fine then what would they be teaching the students who attend SOCC?
The student's needs and education are still the number one concern with the employees that I know. I find their ability to stand up and demand some answers to be very courageous.
Critical Thinking Required wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:54 PM:
It has been three years, Hansen owns this mess; when she came we were a strong, financially solid institution ready for even more growth and innovation for our students. SOCC had a state and national reputation as a leading rural community college. Now what is our reputation?
There are many problems that have not been made public but the budget process is public. Hansen ‘led’ us to a gutted instructional and student services budget and after employee outrage, was forced by the Board and Budget committee to put it all back. Is this what you call leadership?
Clyde wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:04 PM:
UnHappy Employee wrote on Jul 3, 2008 11:19 AM:
Athena wrote on Jul 3, 2008 11:14 AM:
You stated the facts? Were you in the room during these conversations, perhaps as a fly on the wall? Otherwise, what you heard was from someone else claiming injury at the hands of Dr. Hansen. In order to print the facts you actually have to know what facts are. With so many degrees, I would think you would know the difference. How do you know these women are “yes women”? Could it be they have a different opinion than you?
Why the sour grapes? Maybe you didn’t get the promotion you want?
It is obvious you are unhappy at SWOCC. Students deserve to be served by employees with a positive attitude because, like you, they are paying a lot of money for an education. Do the right thing and resign.
Dr. Hansen is the best President this campus has ever had. She involves the community, has strong ethical standards, and is not afraid to follow through with what is necessary to make this college a better place.
Another Happy Employee wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:10 AM:
So guess you didn't read the entire email. The "party" is also to welcome your new boss. Guess you'll soon be dissin' her, too?
Not so happy Employee wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:19 AM:
We were all emailed again this year to come celebrate with judy her birthday at her ice cream social. Does she use college money to throw herself a birthday party every year? How many people would come to it. I think it is a perfect example of a sad little person trying to be "important and popular". If it was a big deal to people the they would throw it for you! Maybe your blog friends can meet you for your birthday so we can keep teaching rather than stroke your ego???
Personally speaking I am busy teaching students and choose to prioritize that over your party. Go ahead and mark be down as one of those who didn't attend. This feeling is by no way a minority around here.
Just the Facts wrote on Jul 2, 2008 11:17 PM:
I stated facts! That's all. If you don't like it take it to someone who makes decisions, not me. And just for the record I am the daughter of a single mom (Vietnam widow) and have multiple degrees that I earned and paid for by myself. If you really need to know I don't enjoy seeing "yes women" rise simply for regurgitating what is fed to them from above with no questions asked! By the way I hope judging me for writing quickly on a Blackberry was satisifying.
One more happy employee wrote on Jul 2, 2008 6:42 PM:
Complaints were made directly to three board members instead of using the procedures in place. These board members held secret illegal meetings. They also violated Dr. Hansen’s employment contract.
The problematic employees did not get their investigation so they encouraged all employee groups to join the vote of no confidence.
It is time to allow Dr. Hansen to hold employees accountable for their actions. Those who claimed a culture of fear are creating a culture of fear for anyone who does not agree with them.
Dr. Hansen is in a difficult position. Most would have left this community by now. We are lucky to have someone with her intelligence and ethics serving as our college president. Time to move forward!
Athena wrote on Jul 2, 2008 12:24 PM:
Dr. Hansen is an asset to the College and it is time to move forward and focus on the students!
Another Happy Employee wrote on Jul 2, 2008 8:04 AM:
Too bad the faculty and classified got duped.
Dismayed wrote on Jul 1, 2008 11:45 PM:
Not as familiar as some wthe situation... wrote on Jul 1, 2008 11:40 PM:
The employees/community need to have these issues quieted, though. They need to hash things out and develop a solution to whatever they percieve to be the problem(s) because as soon as possible, everyone needs to once again make the students their priority.
embarrassed for Judith wrote on Jul 1, 2008 10:54 PM:
To Dr. Hansen wrote on Jul 1, 2008 4:23 PM:
Joanne wrote on Jul 1, 2008 3:14 PM:
Ron wrote on Jul 1, 2008 11:13 AM:
Dean wrote on Jun 30, 2008 7:15 PM:
The questions to be asked are: why have so many employees resigned, why all the secrets about the budget and admistrative decissions? What are you hiding Dr. Hansen???
moonpenny wrote on Jun 30, 2008 6:19 PM:
You dont have to like Judith Hansen or her principles or decisions or even what she has for lunch. But she is
Southwestern Oregon Community College’s President. You will show her that respect. You will do your jobs to the best of your abilities. Anything less should cause you to resign you job, and admit you are not worthy of higher education. I think its shameful what you all did to her just before graduation 2008.
A community member wrote on Jun 30, 2008 4:38 PM:
No confidence votes by overwhelming amounts of staff (including faculty) is very disconcerning. People need to find out the facts (not just one side) before making such inflamatory statements about the staff. These people do not want to spend their days at work in a hostile and mismanaged work environment. Dr. Hansen needs to acknowledge more details of what she needs to change and make some ammends to those idividuals and programs she has negatively effected by her actions.
I am a community member and I know mmany people who work there. I respect them and know first hand how troubled they are. They just want to work in a positive supportive environment of teaching and learning.
Concerned resident wrote on Jun 30, 2008 4:06 PM:
The “No-confidence” vote held by Faculty, Classified, and MASCC employees at SOCC showed clearly that the employees at SOCC have no confidence in President Hansen’s ability to manage their professional organization. The vote was clearly connected to President Hansen’s lack of professional behavior over the last three years.
If President Hansen has nothing to hide then let the investigation continue and find her innocent of all allegations. If she is found guilty let her gracefully decline another term at SOCC and let the healing begin with another president.
CURIOUS wrote on Jun 30, 2008 2:36 PM:
David in CB wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:40 PM:
Hansen is well suited to the task of managing a professional orgaization, not this one in the Southwest of Oregon whose staff has become bloated, spoiled and stagnated and prone to gossip and complain where professionals would come together and think positive thoughts of their glasses which are partly full rather than SWOCC empty. Whiners!
None of these "confidence votes" have anything to do with professional behavior. The only real force these "votes" have is to ruin morale and bring shame on the student body. Enuf already!!!
Get back to work and do your own individual jobs. Just who did you think you were to criticize that which you could never qualify to do in the first place. Amateurs!
Sabrina wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:21 PM:
Resident wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:02 PM:
Just the facts wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:15 PM:
On the positive side there are now plenty of women with no more than high school diplomas that sit in very high positions (one has been sitting in president. It sure shows that you don't need an education to suceed, just a well plassed smooch! That is my honest opinion of what SWOCC offers and it could be so much more with the correct person at the top!




The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines