State plans for another area code

Font Size:  Default font size  Large font size 


Monday, June 23, 2008 | 5 comment(s)

CORVALLIS (AP) — Thirteen years after Oregon added a second area code, the number of numbers available to phone customers in the new 541 area is running out.

State regulators are considering what to do when the numbers are exhausted, which is expected in 2011.

One good possibility is to follow the example set in the 503 area: Just add a new number, as 971 was made available in 2000 for new customers in the 503 area.

That’s the solution recommended by a consultant and the telephone industry. Customers would keep their numbers, but local calls would require 10-digit dialing, including the area code.

But the Public Utility Commission is looking for other suggestions as well, said spokesman Bob Valdez. It is holding a series of 18 public meetings beginning Thursday.

A decision is expected in the fall, with the changes taking effect in 2010.

All the options were weighed for how long they would last before another change is needed. Adding a new area code for new customers in the 541 area is forecast to be good for 24 years.

The other options:

* Break the 541 area into two sections. Most of central and eastern Oregon would maintain the 541 area code, while the western half of the state would add a new area code on top of the 541 code. This option would give customers only a six-year respite before additional changes were required.

* Expand the 971 area code to the entire state, a solution good for 11 to 15 years before a new solution would be needed.

* Split the Willamette Valley from central, eastern and southern Oregon. Give one of the two sections the 541 area code, and give the other a new number — and have those customers bear the cost of making the change in changing stationery, business cards and so forth. That option would be good for 20 years in one section, 29 years the other.

The commission plans open houses in August around the state.
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Elizabeth wrote on Jun 24, 2008 11:51 AM:

10 digit dialing is not boundary dependent, Concerned. What they're talking about is new numbers get issued under new area code - whether they're across the street or on the other side of town. Everyone then dials with area code.

I personally like the idea of new area codes for different blocks of the state, but that's just me. I'm not going to gripe over having to dial a few extra digits, I do know that.. Besides, I'm sure people would squeal just as much for having to get a new area code, so the PUC will most likely go with whatever solution is most cost effective for the mileage (hopefully that last option mentioned).

Elizabeth wrote on Jun 24, 2008 11:32 AM:

Concerned,
When the phone company holds onto a number for 6 months, it's usually because that number belonged to a business & is still being advertised.

I can tell you I'm grateful for that policy, and you would be too if you'd ever been stuck with number that previously belonged to a business, or maybe to someone who had bill collectors or late night friends calling constantly. You get the point. It's annoying to you and your callers. I personally don't want a number that HASN'T been out of commission for 6 months, do you?

Trust me, it's not just too bad for "THEM" when that happens...

Also To Consumer wrote on Jun 24, 2008 9:47 AM:

Most of the state's populace ALREADY uses 10 digit dialing. Eventually, Coos County will have to adapt...but I agree with you on the ensuing chaos,,Especially with the mindset around here.

to consumer wrote on Jun 23, 2008 5:00 PM:

poor baby...dialing 3 extra digits is going to ruin your day? there is always something to complain about, right?

CONSUMER wrote on Jun 23, 2008 1:06 PM:

THIS IS A STUPID IDEA IF THE PHONE COMPANY WOULD NOT HOLD ON TO NUMBERS FOR 6 MONTHS AFTER SOMEONE MOVES, CHANGES THEIR NUMBER, OR GETS THEIR SERVICE SHUT OFF WE WOULD NOT NEED THIS. THEY SHOULD ONLY BE ALLOWED TO HOLD THE NUMBER FOR 30-60 DAYS. IF THE CONSUMER DOESN'T ASK FOR THE SERVICE BACK IN THAT TIME OR PAY THEIR BILL TO BAD FOR THEM. IT IS RIDICULOUS DIALING 10 DIGITS TO CALL ACROSS THE STREET, DEPENDING ON THE BOUNDRY LINES. JUST ANOTHER CROCK OF CRAP.

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | Blog The World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections
Click here for your local weather!