Talk is diplomacy, not appeasement

Font Size:  Default font size  Large font size 


Monday, June 16, 2008 | 1 comment(s)

Should we talk to our enemies? Sen. John McCain in recent days has said Sen. Barack Obama’s willingness to open dialogue with leaders from Iran to Cuba shows his “inexperience and reckless judgment,” but it is McCain who oversimplifies. Presidents from Nixon to Reagan to George H.W. Bush have all talked to our enemies — with the right preconditions — and Obama has vowed to do nothing more or less.

Talk, in and of itself, is diplomacy. Talk is not by definition appeasement, whatever President Bush and McCain might like to pretend. It’s what grown-ups do, before all else, to solve problems.

Obama says he would be willing to meet with Iranian leaders, but only with “sufficient preparations,” and he would do “everything” in his powers to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons. ...

That, to us, sounds like grown-up talk. ...

We’re not sure who Bush’s role models have been for an emotionally childish foreign policy that too often amounts to nothing more than threats and force. Perhaps Charles Bronson.

But Obama promises to take his cue from the likes of JFK and Reagan, two tough Cold War warriors who never stopped talking to the enemy. Obama likes to quote Kennedy’s famous dictum: “Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate.”

What a grown-up thing to say.

Chicago Sun-Times

http://www.sun-times.com
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

BEN wrote on Jun 23, 2008 2:27 PM:

When the U.S. negotiates with "terrorists and radicals," it gives them legitimacy, a precious and tangible political asset. Thus, even Mr. Obama criticized former President Jimmy Carter for his recent meetings with Hamas leaders. Meeting with leaders of state sponsors of terrorism such as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Kim Jong Il is also a mistake. State sponsors use others as surrogates, but they are just as much terrorists as those who actually carry out the dastardly acts. Legitimacy and international acceptability are qualities terrorists crave, and should therefore not be conferred casually, if at all.
This is a quote by John Bolton,former US Ambassador to the UN
"Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations" (Simon & Schuster, 2007).

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | Blog The World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace



Special Sections

More Special Sections
Click here for your local weather!