Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
House defeats timber payment bill
By Matthew Daly, Associated Press Writer
Friday, June 06, 2008 | 1 comment(s)
WASHINGTON — The House on Thursday rejected a bill that would have continued for four years payments to rural counties hurt by federal cutbacks in logging.
A majority of lawmakers voted for the bill, but under special House rules, the bill was defeated. Supporters brought up the measure under rules that did not allow any amendments. The 218-193 vote in favor — largely along party lines — was well short of the two-thirds needed.
The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., denounced Republicans who voted against the bill, saying the vote dealt a huge blow to rural counties in Oregon and other Western states.
Many counties in southwest Oregon are about to lay off employees by the hundreds, DeFazio said — a scenario that could be repeated in rural counties across the country.
“We’re losing sheriffs patrols, jail beds, teachers and other vital public services,” DeFazio said.
DeFazio accused Republicans of siding with “already profit-rich oil and gas companies” instead of rural counties and schools.
But Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., said Democrats were to blame for bringing up a flawed bill. Walden and other Republicans criticized the bill’s plan to pay for the timber program by collecting back royalties from oil companies that were lost due to a government error on drilling leases in the late 1990s.
Democrats said the plan merely closes a loophole created when the Clinton administration failed to include a threshold requiring oil companies drilling in the Gulf of Mexico to pay royalties when market prices reach a certain level.
But Walden and other Republicans said the plan would face a likely court challenge and could violate terms of federal contracts with oil and gas companies.
“We repeatedly warned the sponsor of the bill and Democratic leadership that their strategy of ... paying for this bill by illegally breaking federal contracts would fail,” Walden said. “Today’s outcome was as predictable as it was unnecessary.”
Walden, who supports the timber program, said he would work with DeFazio to find an alternative way to pay for it.
But DeFazio said any attempt by Republicans to expand offshore drilling in the Gulf Of Mexico — even as a way to pay for the timber program — was doomed to fail.
Lawmakers from both parties have tried for several years to salvage the timber program, which helps pay for schools, roads and public safety in 700 rural counties in 39 states. Oregon gets the largest sum of money, followed by California, Washington state and Idaho.
———
On the Net:
The bill is H.R. 3058: http://thomas.loc.gov
A majority of lawmakers voted for the bill, but under special House rules, the bill was defeated. Supporters brought up the measure under rules that did not allow any amendments. The 218-193 vote in favor — largely along party lines — was well short of the two-thirds needed.
The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., denounced Republicans who voted against the bill, saying the vote dealt a huge blow to rural counties in Oregon and other Western states.
Many counties in southwest Oregon are about to lay off employees by the hundreds, DeFazio said — a scenario that could be repeated in rural counties across the country.
“We’re losing sheriffs patrols, jail beds, teachers and other vital public services,” DeFazio said.
DeFazio accused Republicans of siding with “already profit-rich oil and gas companies” instead of rural counties and schools.
But Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., said Democrats were to blame for bringing up a flawed bill. Walden and other Republicans criticized the bill’s plan to pay for the timber program by collecting back royalties from oil companies that were lost due to a government error on drilling leases in the late 1990s.
Democrats said the plan merely closes a loophole created when the Clinton administration failed to include a threshold requiring oil companies drilling in the Gulf of Mexico to pay royalties when market prices reach a certain level.
But Walden and other Republicans said the plan would face a likely court challenge and could violate terms of federal contracts with oil and gas companies.
“We repeatedly warned the sponsor of the bill and Democratic leadership that their strategy of ... paying for this bill by illegally breaking federal contracts would fail,” Walden said. “Today’s outcome was as predictable as it was unnecessary.”
Walden, who supports the timber program, said he would work with DeFazio to find an alternative way to pay for it.
But DeFazio said any attempt by Republicans to expand offshore drilling in the Gulf Of Mexico — even as a way to pay for the timber program — was doomed to fail.
Lawmakers from both parties have tried for several years to salvage the timber program, which helps pay for schools, roads and public safety in 700 rural counties in 39 states. Oregon gets the largest sum of money, followed by California, Washington state and Idaho.
———
On the Net:
The bill is H.R. 3058: http://thomas.loc.gov
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines