Bush didn’t get the answer he wanted

By Terence Hunt, AP White House Correspondent
Saturday, May 17, 2008 | 1 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Saudi Arabia didn’t exactly tell President Bush no. But it sure didn’t say yes, either.

The response seemed to be “maybe” or maybe “a little” when Bush came calling for help in reducing skyrocketing oil prices. Whatever the answer, it seemed unlikely to lower prices at the pump much — if any — for American consumers. It was a setback for the former Texas oilman who took office predicting he would jawbone oil-producing nations to assist the United States.

Bush got a red-carpet welcome to this desert kingdom, home to the world’s largest oil reserves, and promised to ask King Abdullah to increase production to reduce pressure on prices, which soared past $127 for the first time Friday. But Saudi officials said they already were meeting the needs of their customers worldwide and there was no need to pump more.

Their answer recalled Bush’s trip to Saudi Arabia in January when he urged an increase in production but was rebuffed.

Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi said the kingdom decided on May 10 to increase production by 300,000 barrels a day to help meet U.S. needs after Venezuela and Mexico cut back deliveries.

“Supply and demand are in balance today,” al-Naimi told a news conference, bristling at criticism from the U.S. Congress. “How much does Saudi Arabia need to do to satisfy people who are questioning our oil practices and policies?”

Early this week, Senate Democrats introduced a resolution to block $1.4 billion in arms sales to Saudi Arabia unless Riyadh agreed to increase its oil production by 1 million barrels per day.

Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal said the discussion with Bush about oil was friendly. “He didn’t punch any tables or shout at anybody,” the minister said. “I think he was satisfied.”

National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said consumers would not see dramatic price reductions. Oil experts agreed.

Bernard Picchi, an energy analyst at Wall Street Access, an independent research firm, called the 300,000 barrel Saudi production increase “a token amount.”

It would be different, he said, if Saudi Arabia boosted production by 1 million or 1.5 million barrels a day. The announced increase will have Saudi Arabia pumping 9.45 million barrels a day by June, Saudi officials said. That’s about 2 million barrels below its capacity. Analysts also discounted the impact of the U.S. Energy Department’s announcement that it would cancel shipments into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for six months beginning July 1.

“It’s ridiculous because I don’t think this is going to bring the price down,” said Phil Flynn, analyst at Alaron Trading Corp., of the Energy Department’s move.

Midway through a five-day Mideast trip that began in Israel and ends in Egypt, Bush spent the day with Abdullah at his weekend retreat outside the capital. It is known as a horse farm since the king maintains 150 Arabian stallions there. The farm also produces thousands of goats and sheep, bred for the king’s royal banquets.

The sagging U.S. economy and painful gasoline prices are the top concerns of Americans in the heart of a heated presidential campaign. The run-up in oil prices has been alarming.

Futures prices of crude on the New York Mercantile Exchange have more than doubled in the past year, from $62.46 a barrel in the first week of May 2007. Prices reached $100 a barrel for the first time in February and continued rising. They closed at $126.29 Friday.

On Jan. 26, 2000, during a presidential debate, Bush opposed taking oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and instead said then-President Clinton should “jawbone” oil producing nations. That week crude oil prices were $28 a barrel.

Hadley said the Saudis briefed Bush on plans to increase their production capacity. They also argued that even an increase would be unlikely to bring down the soaring prices, which they said were driven more by uncertainty in the market, lack of refining capacity for the type of oil readily available and other complicated dynamics.

Economists say prices are being driven up by increased demand, not slow production. China and India are stretching supplies as they use ever increasing amounts of energy.

Hadley suggested the White House was satisfied with — or at least accepted — the Saudi response. However, he said the Bush administration will see if the explanation “conforms to what our experts say.”

Hadley said Bush and the king also focused on Iran and concern about recent violence in Lebanon, where Hezbollah overran Beirut neighborhoods last week in protest of measures by the U.S.-backed government. The display of military power by the Shiite militant group, which the U.S. considers a terrorist organization, resulted in the worst internal fighting since the end of Lebanon’s 1975-90 civil war.

Sunni-dominated Saudi Arabia — eager to stop any advance of regional power by Shiite-dominated Iran — joins the West in supporting Lebanon’s government. Hadley said Bush and Abdullah shared a concern that the recent events would “embolden Iran.” The U.S. and Saudi Arabia, he said, “are of one mind in condemning what Hezbollah did.”

On Thursday, Hezbollah and the Lebanese government reached a deal to end the violence after Lebanon’s Cabinet reversed measures aimed at the militants.

Bush’s visit was billed as a celebration of 75 years of U.S.-Saudi relations, though they have been frayed by Arab perceptions that Washington favors Israel too much in the dispute with the Palestinians, the Iraq war and the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. The two countries used the occasion of Bush’s visit to sign new agreements.

Among them was an agreement for the U.S. to assist the kingdom in developing civilian nuclear power. Another involves U.S. promises to help protect any Saudi nuclear infrastructure with training, the exchange of experts “and other support services as needed.” Hadley said it would not involve U.S. troops.

Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal, at the news conference with the oil minister, said he shared Bush’s hope for a Mideast peace agreement by next January but sharply criticized Israel for the “humanistic suffering weighed upon the West Bank and Gaza Strip population” of Palestinians. He said Israel’s “continued policy of expanding settlements on Palestinian territories” undermines the peace process.
Tags »
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Mark K wrote on May 17, 2008 10:05 AM:

The United States consumes approximately 20 million barrels of oil per day, or between 7 billion and 8 billion barrels per year.

Approximately 4.5 billion, or significantly more than half of that is imported from outside the country.

A 45 billion barrel oil reserve or new discovery would replace our imports for ten years. Only our IMPORTS. Just for reference, the most optimistic estimate of the oil reserves in Alaska suggests there may be a total of 36 billion barrels available.

Here is a list of the top 15 countries ranked according to proven oil reserves:

http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/04/20/2008-04-20T082333Z_01_L14190681_RTRIDST_0_IEF-OIL-RESERVES-TABLE.html

At 7-8 billion barrels per year consumption in the USA does anyone find it logical to continue maintaining a petroleum energy based economy?

Refs:

United States - Oil Consumption = ~21 million barrels per day = ~7.7 billion barrels per year

http://www.indexmundi.com/united_states/oil_consumption.html

United States - Oil imports = ~12 million barrels per day = ~4.5 billion barrels per year

http://www.eia.doe.gov/basics/quickoil.html

Alaska North Slope may hold 36 bln bbl oil - US DOE
Tue Jan 29, 2008

http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN2922284120080129





*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections