Mishap ruins new chopper

By Jo Rafferty, Staff Writer
Thursday, May 15, 2008 | 43 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
NORTH BEND — It happened in about two seconds.

Ocean Air Aviation/Emergency Airlift’s maintenance crew was working on one of its new helicopters Wednesday at the Southwest Oregon Regional Airport. It was about 1:30 p.m. A pilot sat in the cockpit conducting a balance check. The rotors were spinning.

That’s when it happened.

The aircraft flipped on its side, breaking off and demolishing all four of its rotor blades and damaging the body and tail, said Ed Langerveld, the fixed-base operator’s owner and director of operations, Thursday.

No one was injured. Not the pilot, nor four or five maintenance workers nearby.

“When the maintenance man sped to full power, the helicopter went out of control and flipped over at a 90-degree angle,” Langerveld said. “We’re really happy no one was hurt, scratched, injured in any way.”

Langerveld blamed the crunch on a control rod problem.

The engine was idling and the helicopter was on the ground just outside the Ocean Air Aviation hangar when a rod, located underneath the cockpit that controls the helicopter’s blades, “popped off,” he said.

With no control rod, the pitch of the blades can change.

“If you disconnect that control rod, that’s up there seeking its own direction,” he said, pointing to the rotor head with splintered stubs where the blades had been.

The North Bend Fire Department sent two engines, an airport rescue firefighter vehicle and 21 firefighters to the scene.

“The rotors are gone,” North Bend Assistant Fire Chief Jim Brown said. “They exploded, basically, and went into shards.”

No fuel spilled onto the ground, Brown said, though some motor oil leaked out. That was collected before it could even hit the ground.

North Bend Police also responded, Langerveld said.

The helicopter’s tail boom also crumpled. A window broke and a hole was punched near the cockpit. One rotor blade also cut deep into the asphalt.

Langerveld said the $400,000 helicopter is a total loss, although some parts are salvageable and can be used for repairs on other helicopters.

“When the rotors are damaged, you have to pull the whole transmission apart,” he said.

The crash was not the pilot’s fault, Langerveld said, adding that the Federal Aviation Administration would investigate why the control rod came loose.

“Our guys didn’t do anything wrong,” he said. “They didn’t do a control check because they had no intention of flying. It was a maintenance incident; nothing else.”

Langerveld would not release the name of the pilot, but said, “He went home. He feels really bad.”

He said, in the five years he’s owned the 24-hour-a-day emergency and non-emergency ambulance service, he’s never experienced an incident like this.

“In the 30 years I’ve been flying, there have been no injuries or accidents,” he said.

Langerveld recently purchased three Messerschmitt BO 105 helicopters.

Last week, the FAA conducted certification check rides on Ocean Air’s two helicopters.

Langerveld was scheduled to pick up the last helicopter today, but said he now will have to purchase two of them.

He didn’t know if his insurance would cover an additional helicopter, but the company needs three helicopters before Monday when it is scheduled to become part of his fleet, which includes several other types of aircraft.

“The helicopter division is the newest arm of Emergency Airlift,” Langerveld said. “We’re still sticking to that schedule.

“This is a good, solid, safe program. It had nothing to do with our pilots, our training program and safety program.”

 
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

The Facts wrote on Jun 9, 2008 9:01 PM:

The FAA did two complete investigations and has concluded it was a “maintenance occurrence. “ Since the aircraft was in maintenance with no intention of flight the NTSB would not get involved. EMERGENCY AIRLIFT will remain under the FAA ratings of “Accident & Incident Free.” END OF STORY!

If youre interested these are the facts. wrote on Jun 9, 2008 8:57 PM:

The FAA did two complete investigations and has concluded it was a “maintenance occurrence. “ Since the aircraft was in maintenance with no intention of flight the NTSB would not get involved. EMERGENCY AIRLIFT will remain under the FAA ratings of “Accident & Incident Free.” END OF STORY!

Tony A. wrote on Jun 9, 2008 10:22 AM:

Aviation accidents/incidents do not just happen. Pending the final NTSB/FAA report one has to wonder and question their maintenance procedures and the folks working on the aircraft.

They were also deploying new aircraft which also brings additional unfamiliarity and challenge for pilots and maintenance crews.

To make light of this incident is to fore-stall years of safety work and root cause analysis in aviation. Accidents don't just happen.

Regardless of the fact if the aircraft was to be flown or not all normal pre-takeoff and take-off procedure should have been adhered to and all controls inspected and determined to be in operational readiness. Precautions taken for the safety of personal around the aircraft when rotors are running.

flight nurse wrote on Jun 9, 2008 10:04 AM:

It's easy to get sucked into comment frenzy. There have been many crashes in the air ambulance industry. I personally know of 2 involving a company in south central Oregon. This company boasts safety as their first consern. They use 2 pilots for their fixed wing operation for safety. They had 2 fatal crashes, both with 2 pilots on board.
Accidents happen, for whatever reason. Before we are so quick to critisize we should all stop and thank whomever, we are still alive. It could be any of us defending ourselves or our company. I have been in this business 18 years, married to an air medical pilot with 35 years behind the stick. I am happy to say we have been fortunate. We have had some scary moments. Aircraft are machines and they break. I would rather have an accident happen in maintence on the ground than in the air. We who are in the industry should not be making jokes. We should behave as brothers and sisters bound by what we love no matter who we work for.

Mike wrote on Jun 6, 2008 8:49 PM:

Dan - I couldn’t have said it any better. WELL DONE!

Amanda – I’d sure like to hear the other side of that job interview. I bet you didn’t do as well as you think you did (before you ended it).

To all of the other “Judge & Jury” folks – It sure sounds like you have a hidden agenda to me, or that you just want to antagonize someone. Mistakes and accidents (not just in aviation) happen every day. I bet none of you have ever made or caused one (Amanda ?). He who lives in a glass house, should not throw stones (or get undressed).

This newspaper makes mistakes all of the time. This is not the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal. Don’t expect it. If you don’t like what they write, then don’t read it.

By the way, I don’t know Ed or anyone else involved with this incident. I don’t know any of you folks either (some I don’t want to know).

Ed – I’m glad no one was hurt. If a mistake was made, I’m sure you’ll make corrections. Good luck in your business.

steve wrote on Jun 5, 2008 1:45 PM:

Dave excellent comment, I totally agree with you. Ed was very honest when came right out and said it was a maintence issue. It take a lot to admit to mistakes as he did. This accident was a very expensive learning lesson for Emergency Airlift, I bet they already have new maintenace policies in place to prevent issue like this in the future. The service that Emergency Airlift provides for the community in getting the sick or injured patients to Eugene or Portland in a timely manner is invaluable. I myself have Emergency Airlift ambulance membership, if I ever have the need I will Call them. Ed and Denise I for one am thankful you have provide the air ambulance service to the Bay Area. Thanks for being here.

will wrote on Jun 4, 2008 1:45 PM:

Ok,The FAA will investigate.It will be pretty easy to tell neglect from defect.
I would hold your judgement until it has been properly judged.
Be thankful no one was hurt.

Dave wrote on Jun 3, 2008 5:09 PM:

It is apparent from the negative comments on this thread that those of you who

have posted, have a personal ax to grind with Emergency Airlift, or the Langervelds.

Wether it is from your inability to compete, or inability to gain employment, I am, as

you should be, ashamed of you for using this incident as a vehicle to publicly, yet

annonymously, air your angst. This was nothing more than what it was, an aircraft

incident. I must point

out that Emergency Airlift provides a service to this and the coastal community, and

thanks to the Langervelds vision to see this need, I for one thank them, both for the

emrgency transport, and the employment they provide to our community. Unlike other

airport operations, they give to the community through their operations and employment

opportunities, not just cater to the Bandon jetset to fill their pockets. Thankyou

Mr. and Mrs. Langerveld, and I wish you continuing success in your pursuit to have a

valuable asset to our community.

Terry wrote on Jun 3, 2008 11:46 AM:

The most important thing is that no one was injured. It appears there are a lot of people that have an ax to grind and unless you were actualy at the incident the comments are pure speculation and as any one knows who has been involved in aviation accidents do happen.
Over the years I have been involved with Ed Langerveld he has proved to be honest and trustworthy.Ed has been willing to step up and provide a great service to the community as well as helping stimulate the local economy.To the best of my knowledge he has an excellent safety record.

Terry wrote on Jun 3, 2008 10:46 AM:

The important thing is that no one was hurt. It appears a lot of people have an ax to grind and are making a lot of unfounded comments.
In my dealings with Ed Langerveld he has always been an honest and trustworthy individual. The Langerveld's provide a great service to the community and have funneled a lot of dollars into the community and to the best of my knowledge no one else has stepped forward and been willing to provide this service.
Ed's safety record over the years has been excellent but as any one knows who has been in the aviation busines accidents do happen so unless you were there at the time anything you say is purley speculation.

Amanda wrote on Jun 2, 2008 10:41 AM:

Sweet pea?
Aww thank you. No I have no ax to grind. I just don't think that a person's mechanical ability should be judged by their gender. I also know that, after 10 years of being a helo mech, that I never failed to key a flight control rod.

Jon wrote on May 30, 2008 7:56 PM:

I guess I am just a little surprised that the same day or the day after the incident, Mr. Langerveld is making statements of fact about what occured and the supposed causes. An investigation by an appropriate mishap board will determine the factors involved. A couple of points:

It is rare that the first theory that comes to light is correct. Never make a statement about a serious incident as this was that you will later have to retract.

A helicopter is a rotor wing design. If the rotor head is turning, it is flying. Sure, it may be on the ground at the moment, but make no mistake, it is flying.

And lastly, several people at the airport saw this coming months ago. It is a good thing I didn't take them up on the bets. If the income generated to support the helicopters comes from emergency airlift operations exclusively, the helos won't be around long.

smittys buddy wrote on May 30, 2008 1:37 PM:

sounds like amanda has an axe to grind with these folks.
ever think your the problem there sweet pea ?

Tom wrote on May 30, 2008 12:47 PM:

This area is fortunate to have the services that Emergency Airlift provides. The addition of Helicopters to the fleet of Aircraft operated by Emergency Airlift means that Emergency services are closer and quicker for the people of this County. Accidents do happen, a test performed on the ground, revealing a problem, seems to me better than having a failure while in the air. I met Ed Langerveld through a business venture many years ago and I have never met a more forthright and honest man. I have and will fly in any of Mr. Langerveld’s aircraft without hesitation.

proud to be from oregon wrote on May 30, 2008 12:11 PM:

I'm wondering how the pilot is doing? The artcle stated his feeling were hurt. This must be a VERY hurtful! I heard he lost his shoes and glasses.

Amanda wrote on May 30, 2008 9:24 AM:

I really don't care how "nice" people are, if they are not following procedure. I was a helicopter mechanic and inspector for 10 years! Flight control rods don't pop off! I truly don't need any more facts. This is a serious maintenance malpractice. I am very happy nobody was hurt, however, it could have been tragic. Helicopters are very useful and very dangerous. Maintainers need to be of the highest character and have a strict work ethic.

Friend of Ed wrote on May 29, 2008 1:27 PM:

It never ceases to amaze how people can jump on an issue without having all of the facts. I guess that’s why open investigations work better than rumors and innuendo. In an investigation, the facts of an incident are calmly reviewed, and the entire picture comes clear.

Emergency Airlift had just purchased the helicopter in question. It had not been placed into service. The incident occurred exactly where you would hope it would: in a controlled environment, where safety was maximized. To criticize Emergency Airlift for putting the helicopter through rigorous testing in a controlled environment is ridiculous.

Emergency Airlift is an unbelievable resource for the communities of Coos Bay, North Bend and Southern Oregon. Ed and Denise Langerveld, the operators, are two of the most caring and professional aviation people that I have ever come into contact with. They have taken on the business risk of expanding services that clearly save lives. During over thirty years of operations in the aviation business, neither Mr. Langerveld, nor any business he’s owned or been associated with, have had a single aviation related injury. That record continues.

Observation wrote on May 29, 2008 11:52 AM:

Dan.....Why must you put people down for expressing their opinions. Just because you and Mr. Langerveld work in the aviation industry doesn't make your opinion more valid. People don't want an aviation company that has poor safety standards endangering peoples lives. I think people should question a situation like this, just because you are in the industry doesn't make your opinion more important.

buddah smitty wrote on May 28, 2008 2:29 PM:

amanda your crazy. why dont you look it up in a dictionary

Earl wrote on May 28, 2008 2:26 PM:

Guys and girls, you must remember that accidents happen. now say your sorry and get back to playing nicely with each other

Dan wrote on May 27, 2008 5:36 PM:

I have known Ed for many years and he runs a first class operation. I am both a helicopter pilot and A&P mechanic and have complete confidence in his operation. The aviation business is risky and accidents happen. It takes a person with allot of talent to be in the aviation business for as long as he has.

What amazes me is the negative comments that come from people who have never operated aircraft or have any experience in the industry. Its easy to sit back on the sidelines and tell other people how they would have done things differently. I would bet if they actually tried it for a while they would not be so quick to judge every one else.

Happy Member wrote on May 27, 2008 3:17 PM:

Emergency Airlift provides a vital service to the area, and I'm glad they're available to us. We know that aircraft should be tested prior to going into service, and it appears that Emergency Airlift was doing just that. I'm glad that they're testing their new equipment like they should, and I won't hesitate to call them if a member of my family needs their services!

mishap ruins new chopper wrote on May 27, 2008 2:47 PM:

Bay Cities Ambulance as worked for about 1 !/2 years with EAL and flown many patients to Portland and Eugene. NEVER has safety either of the planes or the pilots ever been questioned. The mishap occured in maintanance not use that is why they do maintanance. I am also a pilot and the same people take care of my airplance and they do excellent work. EAL provides a very needed service to the Bay Area and does it well.

Terry wrote on May 27, 2008 5:45 AM:

After reading these comments it appears to me that there is a lot of speculation based upon a newspaper article. What would give one the idea that it is being brushed off as Mr. Langerveld who lost a helicopter in the incident. This is not an accident report it is a newspaper article. If you read the comments from the nurse who worked for Mr. Langerveld, an informed source, you realize that this is a good company. I have been in aviation for 35 years and I know that Ed Langerveld is a seasoned professional who delivers a safe product. Appears comments may be driven by competition, wait for the facts before you judge.

Thankful wrote on May 26, 2008 3:39 PM:

I would like to thank Emergency Airlift for its service to our community. If it wasn't for this service my son wouldn't be here. He's been airlifted twice from here to Doernbecher. Think of how many lives this company has saved. You're quick to put this company down, but do you realize what a gift they are giving our loved ones? Mechanical issues do happen. Fortunately no one was hurt. I know that Mr. Langerveld is not taking this issue lightly as you believe. Please consider looking further into what is being reported before speaking negatively about a company and/or person.

Concerned Citizen wrote on May 23, 2008 6:25 PM:

I think anytime there is a life threatning accident and the incident is casually brushed off without a care it is a concern. Couple that with Langerveld's story about the helicopter being empty changing to actually having a pilot in it makes people wonder what he is hiding. Clearly Langerveld and his maintenance crew need to take this matter more seriously and not just brush it off like it is not a big deal. If someone would have died I'm sure he wouldn't be so casual. Lets hope in the future the emergency airlift maintenance crew will employ better safety techniques. Clearly the negative feedback on this story must reflect on the negative image Langerveld holds within the community.

outside looking in wrote on May 22, 2008 6:57 PM:

People who are ill informed comment on what they don't know. How do we know that the reporter (who is not an aviation expert and didn't know what they were looking at) didn't understand what Mr. Langerveld was telling them about the accident. No one but those involved fully understand the circumstances surrounding this incident, and it's a sure bet the media got this story wrong as they do in most aviation articles.

Tail Number wrote on May 21, 2008 11:58 PM:

The tail number is covered because the FAA requires that the tail number be covered at the first reasonable opportunity until they are able to conduct the investigation.

Concerned Citizen wrote on May 21, 2008 1:10 PM:

All I can really say about this is that something smells fishy here. First off why is he hiding the tail number of the helicopter in the picture. Secondly, when Langerveld was originally interviewed he stated that no one was in the cockpit at the time of the crash. Now all of a sudden someone WAS in the cockpit. I hope there is a full investigation and hopefully the truth will come out. I would advise people to stay away from emergency airlift as it seems they are up to no good.

PVO wrote on May 21, 2008 10:08 AM:

What is this business about tying down a helicopter for ground runs? Once again, with 23+ years of Army, Coast Guard and Civilian helicopter experience, no one ties down helos for ground runs. Why? The only time I did it, was on a ship (navy thing?), because, guess what, ships move. Ever heard of Ground Resonance, Over Torquing, or Stressing the Rotor Head on a helo tied to the earth? Tying a helo down presents other problems that I would rather not deal with.

PVO wrote on May 21, 2008 10:07 AM:

Well, as an EMS pilot, with BO-105 experience, I wholeheartedly agree that a control rod "popping off" is a serious oversight. People could have, and would have, died if it happened in the air. Maintenance procedures warrant serious scrutiny. As for a preflight, some things are not accessible for the pilot. Checking under the cockpit floor is not feasible or realistic. That is like taking apart the engine(s) before every flight to see if everthing is ok.

Jan wrote on May 20, 2008 7:09 AM:

It's nice to see people are not falling for this nonsense. I hope the NTSB nails him. This could have just as easily killed someone. This is plain negligence.

Concerned citizen wrote on May 17, 2008 10:50 AM:

Flight controls do NOT just pop off!!! They are safety wired or cotter pinned. I have a question for Mr. Langerveld "Why is the tail number covered up?????" What are you trying to hide?

Paramedic wrote on May 16, 2008 8:17 AM:

also, an ex-navy jet mechanic and someone who has worked with this out fit I know they dont follow the rules and guidelines set by the FAA. I wouldnt fly in anything they own. I was also taught that a "pre-flight" was done every time the aircraft was fired unless secured to a platform for engine testing, what were they thinking?

Local Registered Nurse wrote on May 16, 2008 1:46 AM:

After knowing this company for several years through medical emergency transportations...I state with complete confidence that the pilots, maintenance crews and owner are top notch and very concerned about safety for their customers and aircraft. This incident, fortunately without injuries, will only further them to continue to strive for excellence and perfection in service and safety.

Jon wrote on May 15, 2008 9:05 PM:

Wow... It is amazing what a litle gust of wind will do, doesn't it. Flight control rod popped off, wouldn't bet on it. I guess the investigation will tell.

Just An Observer wrote on May 15, 2008 8:14 PM:

Copter crashes while on ground...LOL! I guess Messerschmitt doesn't build 'em like they used to. Back in the day the Me-109 shot down plenty of our planes. Now all they can do is build a copter that crashes when it's on the ground!

Nick wrote on May 15, 2008 4:25 PM:

This calls for an investigation. I, too, smell something a bit fishy... it's hard to say this just "happens" without just a tad bit of negligence on the part of multiple parties.
As a taxpayer, I expect more out of our government... this includes more caution during events such as these, and more accountability from our politicians.

Amanda wrote on May 15, 2008 4:01 PM:


As a full system Quality Assuarance Representative for helicopters, I assure you, readers, flight controls do not just "pop off". There are maintenance procedures that prevent this and obviously those procedures were not followed.
I interviewed a while back at Ocean Air, and the owner actually asked me if I could handle a line job, because I am a woman.I said of course and ended the interview.
Well Ocean Air, that mishap would not have happened on my watch. Perhaps next time, you will ask a man the same question.

Amanda wrote on May 15, 2008 3:54 PM:

Where is the Quality Assurance? I was a full systems Quality Assurance Representative on Navy helicopters, and I guarentee you that flight contol rods, do not just "pop off" they should be tq'ed and pinned, or keyed.
Maybe if gender bias was not rampant at Ocean Air, they would have a good QAR and not be out a 400,000 machine. Feel free to call me if you need a QAR.

Amanda wrote on May 15, 2008 3:35 PM:

A control rod "popped off". Where is the maintenance QA? Why was it not secure? As a former helicopter full systems Quality Assurance Representative, I assure you, this is a very big mistake that couldve been avoided, had proper maintenance pracitices been followed. Call me if you need a QA. I'd be happy to help straighten your program!

Concerned Vet wrote on May 15, 2008 12:48 PM:

Call me silly, but why wasn't the copter secured to the deck during this trial run? Being a former military person, this would have been standard operating procedure for the Navy.

GS wrote on May 15, 2008 12:41 PM:

Ed Langerveld puts a nice 'spin' on his account of this incident. However, if one is going to spin the rotors of a helicopter at full power, why would one not do a control check beforehand? Also, what if the control rod "popped off" while in flight? This incident is more serious than his casual brush-off indicates. I'm sure his insurance company would agree.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections