Cramped space among reasons CB seeks fire station levy

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Saturday, May 10, 2008 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
COOS BAY — There is a reason why firefighters must be physically fit. Responding to medical calls, fires and other emergencies requires strength and agility. Those firefighters in the Coos Bay Fire Department have another reason to remain trim: space.

Their main station’s garage is so tight that there can be as little as 18 inches separating one vehicle from another. When dressed in full turn-out gear, a foot and a half worth of clearance doesn’t accommodate much additional girth.

The city of Coos Bay has offered several reasons why it is asking voters to pass a $6.9 million bond levy to build a new fire hall.

The city’s main station at the corner of Fourth Street and Anderson Avenue is old. It’s cramped, in need of repairs and designed to accommodate far fewer firefighters than currently housed there.

Yet perhaps the most pressing issue can best be illustrated with a basketball.

On a recent afternoon, Battalion Chief Mark Anderson took some visitors into the station’s ground-floor kitchen. Standing at the northeast corner of the room, he set a faded orange ball on the cement floor. It immediately began rolling west, picking up speed before softly thudding into a sofa on the opposite wall.

The station was built on pilings hammered into filled land in 1954, said Fire Chief Stan Gibson. Over the years, the building has settled somewhat, resulting in tilted floors and second-floor door frames that are slightly askew.

While good for amusing visitors with the ball trick, the shifting is an indication of how poorly the station would be able to withstand a serious earthquake.

“(The hall) would be destroyed,” said John Whitty, treasurer of the Fire Station for You committee that is meeting with local groups to encourage voters to support the measure. “There’s absolutely no question about it.”

About 70 percent of the fire department’s resources are stored at the Fourth Street station, Anderson said that would make responding to the large volume of medical and other emergency calls following an earthquake difficult.

“We would have to unbury our own people before we could help others,” he said.

If the bond measure passes, the city would look to build a new fire station on more stable ground. Staff are in land acquisition negotiations with the First Presbyterian Church of Coos Bay, located near the intersection of Fourth Street and Elrod Avenue. Efforts also are being made to purchase an adjacent area owned by Nelson’s Bay Area Mortuary. The next meeting with the church is scheduled after the election, Gibson said.

If the city can’t purchase those properties, other locations will be examined. This location is preferred because it has relatively shallow bedrock and is centrally located.

A new facility would have about 30 percent more floor space, making it easier to maneuver vehicles into the station’s five apparatus bays. It also would be built to current building, energy and public accessibility codes, Anderson said.

Building designs also include between 19 and 34 parking spaces, which could conceivably improve the response time for fire calls, Gibson said.

At the current location, there are two off-street parking spaces. Sometimes, volunteers responding to a general alarm have to park two blocks away and run to the station. This does not necessarily slow down the initial response, but it can delay the arrival of additional equipment.

“If someone is tied up on Seventh Street, we are waiting before we can respond,” said Gibson. “We are not meeting the needs of our own folks.”

Looking to address these problems is not new. Gibson said relocation studies were taking place in 1987 and discussions have been raised at least three or four times since.

Mayor Jeff McKeown said he thought it was a good time to propose a bond measure because a sewer bond levy came off the city’s tax rolls in September of last year. The fire station bond would increase property taxes by 74 cents per $1,000 of assessed value starting in November. This amount is what residents were paying on average the last five years of the old bond, said Coos Bay Finance Director Janell Howard.

If the bond should fail, Gibson said the city would have to seismically retrofit the Fourth Street station, as well as make other repairs. He does not know how much such upgrades would cost.

“If we stay there we would have to spend a lot to repair it, and that’s not money well spent,” said McKeown.

Gibson noted such changes still wouldn’t address all the needs of a modern department. When it was built, it was designed for a staff of one chief and two firefighters working from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.

“Our needs have really changed from the mid-’50s,” he said. “Then, there was no need for dorms or kitchen facilities, other than to make a pot of coffee.”

There also weren’t any female firefighters. Accommodations have been made for these additional needs, but a new facility would greatly improve conditions, Gibson said.

Funding would not be used to upgrade the department’s other two facilities, in Eastside and Empire, though Gibson said residents in those areas also would benefit from a new station. The other facilities are built on soil that is more stable and don’t have the space problems found on Fourth Street.

“We could have addressed the other stations, but then it becomes too large an issue,” Anderson said. “If you prioritize, this is the one that needs the attention.”

Safety is certainly the priority with the new building, McKeown said, though a new fire hall also would serve as a civic symbol.

“We need to do something that our community is proud of, in my opinion,” he said.
Tags »
Bond levy


* What it will pay for: land acquisition, construction of new fire station, purchase of a new fire engine

* Where: Possibly at the current location of the First Presbyterian Church of Coos Bay on Elrod Avenue


* Pros: The Fourth Street fire station would be at risk of collapsing during a sizable earthquake. It also does not meet the operational needs of the city and is not up to building and accessibility codes.


* Cons: Will increase property taxes by 74 cents per $1,000 of assessed value. No improvements will be made to stations in Eastside or Empire with bond funds.





Double majority requirement


To pass the fire station bond measure, the city needs to get more than yes votes. It needs high voter participation as well.


Since the measure comes in a primary election, it is subject to the state’s double-majority statute. So in addition to getting a majority of yes votes, more than 50 percent of the registered voters in Coos Bay must turn in their ballots for the election to count. As of Friday, there were 8,196 voters in Coos Bay, according to Coos County Clerk Terri Turi.


With the Democratic presidential nomination still contested, participation is expected to be heavier than usual. Still, proponents of the fire station bond will be watching the ballot return figures just as closely as they do the numbers in the yes column.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Chris wrote on May 12, 2008 1:40 PM:

People in this town are so resistant to new taxes, and then complain when there is insufficient funding for the government, put 2 and 2 together. Go take a look at the fire station and tell me we do not need a new one. Its plain and simple, if we want quality public servants then we need to treat them correctly, if not they will have the opportunity to go somewhere else where the people (whom they protect) treat them correctly. I'm sorry that its going to take taxes to do it, but if you want to live in a civilized society that has modern services like public safety then you'll have to be willing to actually do something about it. Though new taxes are never pleasant, this tax will only cost about $.20 a day/$100,000 of your home's value (and its just people who own homes, so no one is paying for a service they do not need).

Of Course wrote on May 12, 2008 7:51 AM:

I don't think there should be any wavering on this. If our rescue personnel need a new building, they should get one. There shouldn't be a question here about whether we think they're building it correctly, etc. First priority is safety - for us and them. This should be a no-brainer.

Overbudget wrote on May 10, 2008 4:18 PM:

While I appreciate emergency service workers and the work they do, the new fire station plans are excessive in size and cost, while providing little in the way accommodating future growth. How about proposing a building that better suits the economy, downtown area, and community needs?

fubar wrote on May 10, 2008 3:19 PM:

as one president bush once said, read my lips, no new taxes

June wrote on May 10, 2008 9:39 AM:

Based on the World survey on this page, the levy will fail. Today was the first time I saw anything about the sewer bond levy coming off tax rolls which would make a net increase of almost nothing for the fire station. That information should have been made very public weeks ago - it could have made a big difference in the outcome. It always seems like the needed information for the election comes days after the ballots are received. Many people vote the ballots the day they are received and thus, by the time they find out it wouldn't cost them any more to approve this, it is too late.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections