Weyerhaeuser loses finished alder case; vows appeal


Tuesday, April 29, 2008 | 1 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
PORTLAND (AP) — A Portland jury on Monday ordered Weyerhaeuser to pay almost $28 million for unlawfully monopolizing the market for finished alder lumber.

The award will be tripled under federal antitrust laws.

“We are very disappointed with the verdict,” said Sandy D. McDade, Weyerhaeuser senior vice president and general counsel. “We are confident it will be reversed on appeal because last year the U.S. Supreme Court decided in our favor a case presenting virtually identical issues. We fully expect that the Court of Appeals will apply that precedent.

“Our business conduct has been and remains within the spirit and letter of the law, and we will continue to vigorously defend this case.”

Morelock Enterprises Inc. of Bend filed the suit four years ago and it was later granted class-action status. The plaintiffs could not be reached for comment late Monday.

The U.S. Supreme Court last year tossed out a $79 million judgment against Weyerhaeuser. In that suit, a Vancouver, Wash., company convinced an Oregon jury that Weyerhaeuser paid too much for alder logs it didn’t need, with the goal of driving competitors out of business.

This class-action lawsuit was filed while that case was under appeal.

Morelock alleged that by controlling the logs, Weyerhaeuser was able to monopolize the market for finished alder, the Northwest’s leading hardwood lumber that is used in furniture and specialty products such as guitars.

Weyerhaeuser, based in Federal Way, Wash., is one of the world’s largest forest products companies. Sales last year were $16.3 billion.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Ex wrote on Apr 30, 2008 8:31 AM:

Weyerhaeuser will spend every dime it has on lawyers to appeal this case before it gives a dime to whoever is suing them. They will never pay anyone they really owe money too, corrupt company that they are......


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections