Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Volunteer wrote on May 21, 2008 2:03 PM:
I'm a volunteer firefighter and I remember, months ago, when the city first announced it would seek funds for a new firehall. Kathy Erickson wrote one of her story editorials about what great things had happened back in the day -- when they first built the present firehall. She encouraged readers to make up their own minds about the firehall levy and urged them to go to the current station to see for themselves the shape it is in. I know a lot of people who made up their minds right then that we needed a new firehall. Yesterday, election day, it was approved. Thank you, Kathy Erickson.
GIV EM A CHANCE wrote on May 21, 2008 11:53 AM:
Change can be difficult - but decisions have been made so why not give Clark a chance and embrace the possibilities.
A Poster wrote on May 12, 2008 9:33 PM:
I notice it takes much longer to get anything posted now that Kathy is gone. Also, many posts are not going through. I am losing faith in our local paper.
critic wrote on May 11, 2008 12:19 PM:
The joy, the heart, the passion, the commitment, the delight -- all of that is gone from The World now that they pushed Kathy Erickson out.
k tf gray wrote on May 10, 2008 10:28 PM:
I think the new editor is doing a great job right now just to keep the ship steady and then make some changes once he has the hang of it. I would like to see them put in a membership system on this webpage like espn or something, where we could view the whole paper online for a nominal fee. Keep up the comments, cheers!
Another Reader wrote on May 10, 2008 10:39 AM:
To "A Reader"....I can see that you didn't know Kathy.
A Reader wrote on May 8, 2008 6:42 AM:
Folks, Kathy isn't any differnet then any other editor for any other paper. Newspaper is a hard industry and most people who are in it, are in it because they love it not for the money/fame. As for her not being a part of anything in the community that was her decision not the papers',I have a feeling. Impartiality is something that can be obtained with out being a hermit. I feel that change can be a good thing to get a differnet slant on things. Who knows in 6 months time we all might be writing that we love what has happened at The World. It looks to me like former employees are doing most of the complaining here does that not seem like they have axes to grind. Folks, adapting to change is what life is about...lets move on!
George wrote on May 7, 2008 9:45 AM:
Has the new Publisher/Editor decided that we no longer need to know how many of our troops have been slaughtered in Iraq/Afghanistan?
Critic wrote on May 6, 2008 3:35 PM:
Sorry DEN -- Positive or negative, comments need to be accurate. In fact, it was the PUBLISHER who was a member of the SCDC. Kathy Erickson was so scrupulous about fair coverage that she didn't join any groups, put any signs in her yard, attend any fundraisers or contribute to any campaigns, at all, for 10 years, period.
reader wrote on May 5, 2008 6:07 PM:
I agree with Den, the letters to the editor are put in so many weeks after being sent in, they don't make sense anymore, because whatever the subject was we were writing about is long past anyone remembering it. They also need to publish more letters. That is what people like to read, others opinion of the news, and what is happening locally. Too many KUDOS, as far as I am concerned. They shouldn't take up the space of the regular letters.
Former Employee Again wrote on May 5, 2008 11:32 AM:
Puzzled - I know what you mean by your comment being pulled. As I used to work there, I know what criteria would have to be met in order for a comment to be pulled, and I know mine did not meet that. It's already starting to look like things are on the downhill...
Goody wrote on May 5, 2008 12:54 AM:
What's really hurt the newspapers is being able to read the paper online.
I quit taking it for that reason. When you're a senior, cuts need to be made and that was one of the first to go in my household.
I quit taking it for that reason. When you're a senior, cuts need to be made and that was one of the first to go in my household.
den wrote on May 3, 2008 3:39 PM:
Hoping for a change in the Public Forum. Like having more published. A more non bias reviewer of the submittals. Publish time being sooner than two or three weeks after submittal to the paper. Some type of notification, if there is a problem putting the submitted article in the publication in the forum. My last submittal is waiting three weeks now. Your interesting policy of only so many in a time period, like maybe one a month. Most often after waiting two weeks, the submittal is dropped in on the 1st or second day of the month, excluding a person for the rest of the month, takes the timely factor, out of an issue.
den wrote on May 3, 2008 3:38 PM:
Hello Clark. Is it welcome back, or welcome to the area? Either, welcome.
“Balanced news coverage and honest treatment of every topic are No. 1 in my book,”. I'll be waiting, show me. Would you, or your staff/writers be willing to put in print in the World, that Ron Paul is running for President, is a Republican candidate, in the primary in Oregon, and will be at the Republican National convention to win his final spot for contender on the ballot for the republican Presidential candidate. I doubt it.
“Continuing to be the South Coast's favorite source of news” Sorry clark, still looking. However, many years back the editor became so involved and in twined in the politics of the area, joining groups such as south coast development council, that the independence of the paper was lost. The city council of Coos Bay was news less and the community is not a better place because of it.
“Balanced news coverage and honest treatment of every topic are No. 1 in my book,”. I'll be waiting, show me. Would you, or your staff/writers be willing to put in print in the World, that Ron Paul is running for President, is a Republican candidate, in the primary in Oregon, and will be at the Republican National convention to win his final spot for contender on the ballot for the republican Presidential candidate. I doubt it.
“Continuing to be the South Coast's favorite source of news” Sorry clark, still looking. However, many years back the editor became so involved and in twined in the politics of the area, joining groups such as south coast development council, that the independence of the paper was lost. The city council of Coos Bay was news less and the community is not a better place because of it.
Brad wrote on May 3, 2008 10:58 AM:
Perhaps the new publisher/editor will cease the World's tradition of spreading hate and discontent whenever the possibility of new industry is proposed for this area.
Spectator wrote on May 3, 2008 9:04 AM:
I like Teapot's Comment about renaming "The World", "The Daily Planet", as we now have Clark. And if he hires an assisstant by the name of Perry White, I will have full confidence that all will be well.
Puzzled wrote on May 2, 2008 1:40 PM:
I went to leave a Comment for the article introducing the New Editor/Publisher, and noticed it was pulled??? Questionable start for Clark. I hope that his 90 hours a week job plus Political, Social, and Community Meetings and Events leaves time for his personal life, and doesn't overload his staff.
AMAZING wrote on May 2, 2008 1:07 PM:
Any of chance of unchaining The World from the publicly-traded gulag and restoring one of Sheldon Sackett's heirs to the publisher's chair?
The Bay Area could use his brand of irreverent journalism instead of the typical politcally correct poppycock we see everywhere today.
The Bay Area could use his brand of irreverent journalism instead of the typical politcally correct poppycock we see everywhere today.
Lemming press wrote on May 1, 2008 1:57 PM:
Don't really care who the editor is as long as The World keeps up the storied tradition of liberal, left-wing, socialist propaganda that has become the best fire-starting material for my woodstove! Long live the "If it's in print, it must be true" Lemming press!
Marie wrote on Apr 30, 2008 8:59 PM:
Just because some of you are displeased with this situation does not mean that The World newspaper will go out of business....I will still continue to get the paper. Get over it, life goes on and so will the paper. Change was made for one REASON or another. The bottom line is the individuals that are saddened by the dimissal of Janet and Kathy may not get the paper but lots of others will. Move on with life and good luck to The World newspaper. I support the disission they made.
Similar Qualities wrote on Apr 30, 2008 6:47 PM:
Lee Enterprises has really pulled a fast one on some great employees, reminds me of a local college president that has been doing some similar techniques of "cleaning house".
Very sad wrote on Apr 30, 2008 6:44 PM:
I'm so sorry Kathy! I know this must be hard on you! But it seems as though Lee Enterprises is a corrupt company and you're better off without them. They don't know what they have done, but they have messed up. Hang in there and know that there are a lot of people in this community that stand behind you for who you are, a great person.
LC wrote on Apr 30, 2008 4:03 PM:
Maybe the new guy will hire some proofreaders for this paper because it sure does need it AND it need someone to actually verify the facts before printing them because there are A LOT of errors printed in The World Newspaper.
CC wrote on Apr 30, 2008 7:53 AM:
MAYBE THE NEW EDITOR WILL NOT ALLOW
RON GALLAGHER TO RUN A LETTER EVERY TUESDAY!!!
Tripod wrote on Apr 29, 2008 3:51 PM:
Shame on you Lee. The justice is in, that you can't escape your own energy.
Umm Elaine wrote on Apr 29, 2008 2:09 PM:
Just an FYI - The majority of things we "lefties" have on our "agenda" (ie. ending the war, pro-choice, education improvement, ending corporate corruption, etc etc etc) are actually MAINSTREAM views nowdays.
In other words, that slant you feel is the Earth being round ;)
In other words, that slant you feel is the Earth being round ;)
Harold K wrote on Apr 29, 2008 1:10 PM:
Kathy cares about our Constitutional rights. Lee seemingly cares about putting out a McNewspaper on the cheap. What are we going to do about it?
Camby Collier wrote on Apr 29, 2008 12:23 PM:
I enjoyed the way Kathy Erickson presented the World newspaper. Things were changed and updated over the last few years and being online also is a great perk. I could always find out what was going on in our community, state and nation. I enjoyed her editorials that were right-on. Some people say she was liberal leaning. I am problaby the most conservative person in Coos County and never found any offense with her article placements. Don't confuse me for a neo-con, but, golly, she even had Ann Coulter editorials. For as small as the paper is (8-10 pages in Section A),I thought she kept us informed. I want to thank her for publishing the many editorials I have submitted. And I want to thank her for the LNG articles she put in as an effort to educate Coos County of that industry, both pro and con. I didn't know her personally. I don't know why she was let go, but there will be big shoes to fill in her absence.
That's how I feel about Kathy Erickson.
That's how I feel about Kathy Erickson.
Marie wrote on Apr 28, 2008 7:26 PM:
Has everyone here making comments in support of Kathy read her April 19th Who arrested them? Where are they? Who knows? I fined this article insulting to all of our law agencies.
Professional Jounalist,
Where was this article warm or compassionate? You stated Kathy's passion was for one thing and one thing only; THE STORY.
I believe that you are right.
Maybe Kathy needed to take into consideration that others had a job also.
Professional Jounalist,
Where was this article warm or compassionate? You stated Kathy's passion was for one thing and one thing only; THE STORY.
I believe that you are right.
Maybe Kathy needed to take into consideration that others had a job also.
Elaine wrote on Apr 28, 2008 7:09 PM:
The circulation of the World paper has dropped. I believe Kathy is part of the reason. I cancelled my subscription a few years ago due to the lefty slant. A paper should be fair and I hope that change comes to the World.
Kari wrote on Apr 28, 2008 5:09 PM:
I've lived in three small communities where this occured.
The World will become nothing more than an advertising circular. Watch and Weep.
Too bad, I don't think we'll get it back.
The World will become nothing more than an advertising circular. Watch and Weep.
Too bad, I don't think we'll get it back.
POINT OUT THE OBVIOUS wrote on Apr 28, 2008 3:50 PM:
Concerned wrote on Apr 28, 2008 2:47 PM:
I sincerely hope that we will not see honest and accurate journalism being replaced with the slanted spin of The Corporate Right Wing view.
I hope you're prepared for sensationalism and things that will sell papers and drive page views - because that's how they will make their money and it's obvious that's the only thing that is important to LEE Enterprises.
I sincerely hope that we will not see honest and accurate journalism being replaced with the slanted spin of The Corporate Right Wing view.
I hope you're prepared for sensationalism and things that will sell papers and drive page views - because that's how they will make their money and it's obvious that's the only thing that is important to LEE Enterprises.
Concerned wrote on Apr 28, 2008 2:47 PM:
I sincerely hope that we will not see honest and accurate journalism being replaced with the slanted spin of The Corporate Right Wing view.
SAD SITUATION wrote on Apr 28, 2008 1:49 PM:
I really feel for those left behind in the Editorial Department to have their leader stripped away from them and then to be expected to pick up the pieces.
Oh and "Current Employee" unless you've worked there for over five years, I don't think you have room to talk about how things were and how things are. I'm sure you're benefiting from the downfall of former good employees.
Oh and "Current Employee" unless you've worked there for over five years, I don't think you have room to talk about how things were and how things are. I'm sure you're benefiting from the downfall of former good employees.
Brem wrote on Apr 28, 2008 9:13 AM:
It is apparent that the community is saddened by the removal of Kathy Erickson. This will probably be evident in decreased client spending and profits.
Loyalist wrote on Apr 28, 2008 8:20 AM:
It is obvious that Kathy's hard work, devotion, and awards for accomplishment did not provide job security. Who's next? Maybe even Nathan Bekke?
hmmmm wrote on Apr 27, 2008 2:44 PM:
I used to work there and I was constantly told by the prior mgmt that "we dont want to do things a particular way just becuase thats just how its always been done, if there is a better way, lets do it" I found it a very forward thinking and acting team.
Doug wrote on Apr 27, 2008 2:36 PM:
Hooray for the Liberation of Kathy Erickson from a one-sided love affair with "The World" newspaper, as she was grossly underpaid for her work and the responsibility that she embraced.
Teapot wrote on Apr 27, 2008 2:32 PM:
I trust that Lee has hired Superman to replaceand maintain successfully, the work of these two persons, and their responsibility for three newspapers. Lee might consider renaming "The World", "The Daily Planet".
Prior Employee that left the area wrote on Apr 27, 2008 11:54 AM:
I read several comments from prior employees about how great it was at the newspaper. I'm a prior employee as well and the old publisher prior to Janet Geary, though respected in the community, did not allow his staff to be forward thinking. No one has mentioned that the paper has not made money in several years and the prior management team was the major cause of this. Though this community has seen a great loss with Kathy and from what I hear Janet, people are always one sided when it comes to the truth. If you want the real truth of how the paper is doing, just look at the financials. I wish the very best to the staff that remain and hope this community will finally start supporting them before the remainder of the employees are out of a job.
plus low pay wrote on Apr 27, 2008 11:11 AM:
I remember a couple years ago The World published the salaries of prominent people in our community, I think it was mostly city, county goverment types of jobs. it listed Kathy Erickson as making in the low 40s range. I was at the time shocked at how little the editor of our paper made. I feel they she should have been given a big,fat raise, not dismissed. I know someone who is a friend of hers and the hours a comment below said she worked are not
overstated. Its all a bit upside down. it will be very interesting to see who they can find to replace her. It will for sure be someone from somewhere else, who knows nothing about the local area. If you think we will get more local stories, you are most likly wrong.
overstated. Its all a bit upside down. it will be very interesting to see who they can find to replace her. It will for sure be someone from somewhere else, who knows nothing about the local area. If you think we will get more local stories, you are most likly wrong.
REALITY wrote on Apr 27, 2008 9:57 AM:
Do you all not read the news? The reality is all and I mean all media (newspaper, radio, and tv) are suffering in this economy. Running a business you have two options.....increase revenue or cut expenses. Granted it is a real shame that Lee Enterprises has to resort to losing two professionals, but if the residents don't get off their high horse and start supporting the paper and businesses not start advertising more, then we will continue to see the decline of the media. Let's stand as a community and not let this happen to our town.
Saddened by loss wrote on Apr 26, 2008 6:43 PM:
I worked with Kathy for 9 years and don't see how Lee could find anyone to replace her let alone consolidate her job with another full-time position. At the paper where I now work, which isn't much bigger, it takes about 6 people to do what Kathy did. They all have company cars and expense accounts and each probably makes twice what Kathy made. She could have worked anywhere but she wanted to be in her hometown, where she thought she could do the most good. See what that's gotten her. Lee is making a huge mistake.
Just Wondering wrote on Apr 26, 2008 6:11 PM:
"Quit with the negative waves"--why do people accuse others of this? Every issue has at least two sides, and discussing both sides used to be positive interaction and, in the case of elections, part of making informed decisions. Is debate of any kind unhealthy today? Should change be done for the sake of change itself?
AKY wrote on Apr 26, 2008 1:25 PM:
If Kathy Erickson was to comment on these comments, she would express her belief in Freedom Of Speech.
Brem wrote on Apr 26, 2008 9:37 AM:
This is a Rural Community, and by it's nature, gets it stregnth and survives on the character of the people that live here. Loyality, Honor, and Integrity pave the way. Money is important, but People first. Lee Corp. has betrayed this code, and hence, lacks trust. I, for one, do not choose to support this attitude, and will not continue to spend money in advertising in Lee's Publications, and will express my feelings to my friends and associates.
A READER wrote on Apr 26, 2008 8:14 AM:
Some of our narrow minded simpletons who spout what wall street is saying make The World out as some diease festering amonst us. Not! If what wall street says is true then I give the paper kudos for not pulling out, because folks Lee is a very big publishing company and could close this down very easily, but I see them as caring about Coos Bay and trying to keep the paper open. Again quit with the negative waves folks..I like reading the paper.
relieved wrote on Apr 26, 2008 7:48 AM:
This probably won't make the comment board, but I have to try. I wish no harm or ill-will to Kathy, but this is a relief to me as a long-time citizen.
Since her post as editor, I have been privy to 2 different people being smeared and practically ruined because the paper has been willing to do the dirty work of certain powerful people in this community. Facts were left out and spin was allowed in the stories. I do not know if the paper was aware of the harm it did, I have chosen to assume they were innocent in their deception.
Since then, I have had no confidence in anything the paper has reported.
I would name names and give details, but I am afraid of being next and I need to support my family. I hope this change will help clean up this area that I love.
Since her post as editor, I have been privy to 2 different people being smeared and practically ruined because the paper has been willing to do the dirty work of certain powerful people in this community. Facts were left out and spin was allowed in the stories. I do not know if the paper was aware of the harm it did, I have chosen to assume they were innocent in their deception.
Since then, I have had no confidence in anything the paper has reported.
I would name names and give details, but I am afraid of being next and I need to support my family. I hope this change will help clean up this area that I love.
CLAMSLAYER wrote on Apr 26, 2008 3:30 AM:
I think the senior community has buoyed the World for a long time, due to their habits and preferences for physical papers. They haven't had to deal with the realities many other communities with more even age distributions have faced.
The paper is an institution, like marriage or any other. The newer generations will put their own mark on it, and that may be indifference. If it is, we won't have the World to kick around much longer.
They need to become relevant in the day to day life of the other 50-75% of the population.
The paper is an institution, like marriage or any other. The newer generations will put their own mark on it, and that may be indifference. If it is, we won't have the World to kick around much longer.
They need to become relevant in the day to day life of the other 50-75% of the population.
Professional Journalist wrote on Apr 26, 2008 2:47 AM:
Anyone who knew Kathy Erickson for more than five minutes would know she is a warm, compassionate, dedicated and loyal woman. Her massive contributions to the World were severely unappreciated. Journalism is a tough life, but it was a life Kathy lived with passion for one thing and one thing only: the story. Her love was for this community and I can tell you one thing, as a former employee - Kathy gave 150% everyday, all day long. Lee has lost a valuable and dedicated woman and her loss will be felt for a long time at this understaffed, over-worked and underpaid newspaper.
Darla - your comments disgust me. The former employees all stand up for Kathy because she has been one of the only constants in a sea of changing owners, publishers and other staff. We stand up for her because she respected employees and the work they did to help your community at HER newspaper. The World belonged to the Bay Area and it's heart always resided with Kathy Erickson.
Hang in there World folks. I'm sending you love and good wishes Kathy!
Darla - your comments disgust me. The former employees all stand up for Kathy because she has been one of the only constants in a sea of changing owners, publishers and other staff. We stand up for her because she respected employees and the work they did to help your community at HER newspaper. The World belonged to the Bay Area and it's heart always resided with Kathy Erickson.
Hang in there World folks. I'm sending you love and good wishes Kathy!
gina wrote on Apr 25, 2008 10:54 PM:
If you people who complained think the paper is so terrible, why do you waste your time reading it and responding on these boards?
Don wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:50 PM:
I have met with Janet several times and I have to say I really think that The World won't be a better place without her! She really had a positive outlook and I think she brought a lot to the table. I think since she came here the paper has improved, the website has improved and community involvement in the paper has improved. For example we can comment on stories.
As for the editor, I don't know her personally but I have heard quite a bit of negativity about here from the business community. So maybe that will work out, maybe it won't.
I am hoping for everything to get even better in the coming years
As for the editor, I don't know her personally but I have heard quite a bit of negativity about here from the business community. So maybe that will work out, maybe it won't.
I am hoping for everything to get even better in the coming years
Supporter wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:41 PM:
I have met with Janet several times and I have to say I really think that The World won't be a better place without her! She really had a positive outlook and I think she brought a lot to the table. I think since she came here the paper has improved, the website has improved and community involvement in the paper has improved. For example we can comment on stories.
As for the editor, I don't know her personally but I have heard quite a bit of negativity about here from the business community. So maybe that will work out, maybe it won't.
I am hoping for everything to get even better in the coming years
As for the editor, I don't know her personally but I have heard quite a bit of negativity about here from the business community. So maybe that will work out, maybe it won't.
I am hoping for everything to get even better in the coming years
A READER wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:10 PM:
Oh come on people the paper will go on and will continue to be published. Thank goodness. There are many towns our size that don't have locally run papers. Lets give them some support, sometimes change can bring about growth and that would be great for us the readers. I like the fact that The World is still publishing. Quit with the negative waves!
In The Biz wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:09 PM:
I've been in the business a long time and know Janet Geary well. She is a leader of leaders--too bad for Lee.
Lee has combined top level positions before and that failed. Many of us in the business remember when they fired many publishers and made their Ad Directors the General Managers. You'd think they would have learned from that experience.
It's clear, the investors want their profits and that's paramount.
The newspaper world will be much better off when they're not owned by big corporate conglomerates who cart the money out of the community to pay those big fat million dollar bonus checks to corporte CEO's for bringing the investors the 30 - 40% returns.
I heard on OPB a couple years ago...a former publisher of a California paper who said "Newspapers will get healthy again when they are no longer in the hands of Wall Street investors".
Now that's the real bottom line!
Lee has combined top level positions before and that failed. Many of us in the business remember when they fired many publishers and made their Ad Directors the General Managers. You'd think they would have learned from that experience.
It's clear, the investors want their profits and that's paramount.
The newspaper world will be much better off when they're not owned by big corporate conglomerates who cart the money out of the community to pay those big fat million dollar bonus checks to corporte CEO's for bringing the investors the 30 - 40% returns.
I heard on OPB a couple years ago...a former publisher of a California paper who said "Newspapers will get healthy again when they are no longer in the hands of Wall Street investors".
Now that's the real bottom line!
The Rookie wrote on Apr 25, 2008 8:50 PM:
Lee is floundering in all of its operations. If you don't believe that, check out the company's Q2 report to stockholders on its corporate websiite: http://www.lee.net/newsreleases/news-2008-04-21-qn.shtml
Lee's problem is the same as other large chains — they have become extraction businesses, meaning they take more out of communities than they contribute to them. Coos Bay will start to recover when Lee leaves. The best thing that could happen is an employee buyout or a takeover by a consortium of local investors, which is what happened just the other day in Hailey, Idaho.
Lee's problem is the same as other large chains — they have become extraction businesses, meaning they take more out of communities than they contribute to them. Coos Bay will start to recover when Lee leaves. The best thing that could happen is an employee buyout or a takeover by a consortium of local investors, which is what happened just the other day in Hailey, Idaho.
The Rookie wrote on Apr 25, 2008 8:40 PM:
Lee is floundering all over the place. If you don't believe that, go look at their Q2 report on Lee's corporate website: http://www.lee.net/newsreleases/news-2008-04-21-qn.shtml
Their problem — they have become an extraction business, meaning they take more out of a community than they give back ... then they wonder where their readers and advertisers have gone. The best thing that could happen is for Lee to sell to the employees or a consortium of local investors, like they just did in Hailey, Idaho.
Lee is bad joo-joo. Coos Bay will be better off when they leave.
Their problem — they have become an extraction business, meaning they take more out of a community than they give back ... then they wonder where their readers and advertisers have gone. The best thing that could happen is for Lee to sell to the employees or a consortium of local investors, like they just did in Hailey, Idaho.
Lee is bad joo-joo. Coos Bay will be better off when they leave.
FormerFuture Advertiser wrote on Apr 25, 2008 7:41 PM:
About time. I quit advertising a year ago in disgust at the dunderheaded errors and biases I found in The World. I wouldn't spend another cent on advertising in this paper unless it becomes something I can safely be associated with again.
fred kirby wrote on Apr 25, 2008 5:17 PM:
Thank you Lord! The Novena was worth it! An opportunity for a real local newspaper. A newspaper that is not afraid of the news; that reports all the news; not just retread AP stories and news favorable to the friends of a few World employees. Hopefully the new editor publisher will start by asking people whats wrong. Hopefully they will listen.
advertiser wrote on Apr 25, 2008 5:09 PM:
As one of the larger business owners in the area I can tell you that when we are in a slump it is even more important to keep advertising. If our advertising money has dropped off to the paper it has more to do with the large turnover in the ad staff in the past year. They had high quality, competent reps before that I trusted with my money, they seem to have went to work elsewhere.
Cindy Huddleston wrote on Apr 25, 2008 5:05 PM:
For some time now I have enjoyed reading KE's editorials. One thing that almost always comes across is her love for this community. Like so many of you that read The World, her roots are here. As a young girl she lived in Englewood and she graduated from Marshfield, and she has so much history and memories of Coos Bay in her head and in her heart. I love to listen to her and my husband reminisce about the good old days! She has a personal stake in the prosperity of this community, and as your Editor she has dedicated herself to the highest standard of journalism. I doubt that anyone they try to replace her with would give as much or care as much as she does. Good luck finding someone with her talent and ability combined with her love for our community. It saddens me greatly to know that The World let go of such a gem as Kathy Erickson.
CC wrote on Apr 25, 2008 4:38 PM:
Oh great..now we will have to be "Premium Members" to make comments.
Local Resident wrote on Apr 25, 2008 4:35 PM:
I don't think the change is due to poor performance on either of the former employees parts. The problem for Lee Publishing is that newspaper revenues throughout the nation are at an all time low. The internet and 24 hour news stations have take the reader of past away from many newspapers. In addition, with the housing and automotive industries in a major slump, the revenue from these normally large advertisers is slim.
CURRENT EMPLOYEE wrote on Apr 25, 2008 4:23 PM:
I do currently work at the World and I like my job. I have gone through many changes and I feel that it will only get better. Kathy will be missed in the community but the World will still provide true and accurate news for our loyal readers. We will still provide our same service to our valued customers.
Current Employee wrote on Apr 25, 2008 4:20 PM:
As a current employee here at The World it is business as usual. Yes we liked both Janet and Kathy but fortunately life goes on and so does business. Janet will be missed but we are all very professional here and we have a job to do and we do it. Actually, its very calm here no tears...just everyone here working to publish your paper folks
Joe Blow wrote on Apr 25, 2008 4:05 PM:
I dealt with Janet in a professional capacity and found her to be extremely capable and really knew what she was doing. I know she'll have no problem recovering.
Shannon wrote on Apr 25, 2008 4:03 PM:
I knew both Kathy and Janet and found them both to be professional newspaper people. I feel the paper has made great strides in the last year to connect to the community. It's a sad day for the Bay area and The World. Good luck to both these fine ladies!
LOL wrote on Apr 25, 2008 3:58 PM:
LOL...I would love to see some current employees tell you what it's really like working there right now, unfortunately they need their job as jobs are hard to find. And they know that they don't dare comment or at least make their identity knows if they do. It's not the employees that are stupid.
Change...Ive been hearing that a lot lately wrote on Apr 25, 2008 3:56 PM:
Change is a good thing; it's what helps society develop. Stop complaining and support innovation.....
Joe Six Pack wrote on Apr 25, 2008 3:54 PM:
I hope the World gets out of making news or leaning to a side. Just report the news and know all people fib in some form!
Same thing another day wrote on Apr 25, 2008 3:37 PM:
If you always do the same thing you will always get the same results. Change is not always a bad thing. Why not give them a chance.....they have been here for over 100 years, so maybe the paper might have some idea of what they are doing. Instead of listening to complaining prior employees, why not ask the people that are working their how they feel about their employer. I agree with "Concerned Resident". IT IS TIME FOR CHANGE even from our Community.
obvious wrote on Apr 25, 2008 3:29 PM:
I have always found the title "the world" to be a bit ironic.
it is also ironic that the article on the railroad and on the jetty hav e had no comments. you all are a bunceh of drama queens and gossipers
it is also ironic that the article on the railroad and on the jetty hav e had no comments. you all are a bunceh of drama queens and gossipers
Doug wrote on Apr 25, 2008 3:02 PM:
Lee Corp. has made a classic, insensitive and poor business decision, and will live with results. They will not be able to replace a Rare employee as Kathy Erickson, who was a devoted, committed, and loyal Editor whose heart was in producing it Right. She started to work at 5:00 AM and usually finished at 5:00 PM, and was there on Saturdays and Sundays with an average work week of 70 hours. Good luck Lee...your's going to need it!
Darla wrote on Apr 25, 2008 2:44 PM:
It's a good day for some. Hopefully for The World's future.
So many of Kathy's supporters here seem to be former "World" employees who express how much "fun" they had working at The World. Maybe that could help explain the poor quality of our local fish wrapper (although those same posters seem to be the ones saying the quality of The World was once high? Ummm...when?). Sounds like too much fun and not enough work. Maybe it's time to get down to business....
So many of Kathy's supporters here seem to be former "World" employees who express how much "fun" they had working at The World. Maybe that could help explain the poor quality of our local fish wrapper (although those same posters seem to be the ones saying the quality of The World was once high? Ummm...when?). Sounds like too much fun and not enough work. Maybe it's time to get down to business....
Concerned Resident wrote on Apr 25, 2008 2:15 PM:
The World is one of the biggest employers in the area. Shut them down and you shut down a lot of jobs. Our economy is already hurting...."so lets add another log on the fire!". Come on economy....you need to support your local paper or you lose your own identity.
Local Business Owner wrote on Apr 25, 2008 2:08 PM:
I always find it interesting that prior employees want to make comments about their prior employer, but bottom line there are always two sides to the story. I know there are several people that are still working at the world and have been there a very long time. The newspaper is a business, just like your business...and they need to be profitable. I think as readers we sometimes forget this is a business and expect them to tailor to our needs. I'm sure the paper wishes the very best for these two individuals, and I wish the very best to The World. Not to worry, I will not be cancelling my subscription and will continue to advertise my North Bend business in The World.
Jen wrote on Apr 25, 2008 1:26 PM:
I'm a little befuddled by the negative comments here as well. Like "Confused", I've seen nothing but improvement. Then again, I only read online.
I have noticed a lot more AP stuff, and they do need more locally written columns in addition to stories... But, overall I have to say they have VASTLY improved the website (again, there is my bias being an online reader).
I have noticed a lot more AP stuff, and they do need more locally written columns in addition to stories... But, overall I have to say they have VASTLY improved the website (again, there is my bias being an online reader).
TUTTUT wrote on Apr 25, 2008 1:26 PM:
Shame Shame on The World and Lee Enterprises- they are even taking down valid comments, you've made your bed now you need to lie in it.
Mikey wrote on Apr 25, 2008 1:21 PM:
Well Good Riddens. NOw maybe we caqn get some reaal news! Instead of this feel good junk!
not very fair wrote on Apr 25, 2008 1:03 PM:
I dont think it is fair for the world to be able to remove it from the most commented on list. I bet Hough Mcadams, and others would have liked to have their stories taken out, but they are left up as long as they are generating readers.
If you do this, boo to you World newspaper
If you do this, boo to you World newspaper
I wonder wrote on Apr 25, 2008 12:58 PM:
I wonder how The World will handle this story getting so many comments? I noticed they have already taken it out of the "most commented on" box. I bet they dont keep the story up for long.
I dont think the publisher being removed from her position suprised anyone, she never did really fit the position well but Kathy Erikson was a gem.
I dont think the publisher being removed from her position suprised anyone, she never did really fit the position well but Kathy Erikson was a gem.
Bob wrote on Apr 25, 2008 12:46 PM:
Kathy Erickson will be missed. It’s a shame Lee is making this decision. Combining the editor and publisher position can lead to nothing good. Who would want to take the reins on this job? This is clearly a way for Lee to cut costs. The company has not invested itself in the community. Readers need to hope for local ownership, or for Lee to truly put some resources into this dying paper. Newspapers are essential to a community, but this is no way to manage one. I, for one, will now support The Register-Guard, a family owned newspaper. Good luck, Kathy.
Confused wrote on Apr 25, 2008 12:32 PM:
I'm really confused with this decision. I have been a subscriber for a very long time and thought the paper was starting to make a great turn. The amount of local stories had increase and the special publications had increase in quality over 1000%. Did you not get the Relocation Guide or Home Show Guide in your newspaper? Though I may not understand why they chose to make this move, I believe the paper has really tried to move forward. Look at this awesome website and the ability for you to be able to make these type of comments. Before the community never had a voice. So kudos to them in my opinion.
Agent M wrote on Apr 25, 2008 12:10 PM:
While I can not say I agreed with every story ever run, I do hold GREAT deal of respect for Kathy Erickson. I am quite sure that her leaving was not of her design, and I wish her the best and she will be sadly missed!
As for Lee inc. Good luck to you, your going to need it...someone else said it here, and they are right; This area can hold a grudge, a LONG time.
As for Lee inc. Good luck to you, your going to need it...someone else said it here, and they are right; This area can hold a grudge, a LONG time.
Sharon and Dave wrote on Apr 25, 2008 12:04 PM:
Kathy upheld high journalistic standards. The new owners clearly are more concerned about the bottom line--it's just a business to them. In the past, local newspapers were created and operated by people with passion about their towns. Susan is right, local people want honest and fair reporting of the news. Kathy often took controversial stands but she also respected those with different opinions. While we didn't always agree with Kathy, we respected and liked her. We've lost a talented and committed editor and voice of reason.
Maxine wrote on Apr 25, 2008 11:21 AM:
Most of these comments you could change the word The World to Southwestern President as it looks like the same thing happened when the new President took over.
Mark Smith wrote on Apr 25, 2008 11:13 AM:
I don't see this as a totally bad thing as a lot of people think this paper hasn't really changed with the times and wasn't meeting the needs of the community. I would like to know more about why they left but will probly always be wondering.
Susan Williams wrote on Apr 25, 2008 10:56 AM:
I agree with Carol 100 percent. I can't believe that they would treat Kathy, who is a pillar of Coos Bay, with so little respect. The people of Coos County are loyal and can hold a grudge for years, I don't see the paper being able to bounce back after this one. I will be surprised if the press prints a date of 2009.
I worked at The World for 6 years and had a blast. We all cared about putting out a quality publication and having a good time doing it. It's sad to think that the place that I loved and the people that I cared about are no longer there.
I worked at The World for 6 years and had a blast. We all cared about putting out a quality publication and having a good time doing it. It's sad to think that the place that I loved and the people that I cared about are no longer there.
Sherry Kinsey wrote on Apr 25, 2008 10:47 AM:
I'm with you Carol!! And we did have good times and good leadership until their ability was taken away from them. The losses they've suffered in the last few years can't be regained. The glue that held the place together has come undone and it's falling apart.
Carol Shaw wrote on Apr 25, 2008 10:37 AM:
The day that Greg Stevens left the paper is the day that it went downhill in the eyes of the business community, and really never recovered. Now losing Kathy Erickson..they may as well lock up the building.
Its really too bad, I worked there for over 12 years and loved my job. It used to be a really great,fun place to work.
Its really too bad, I worked there for over 12 years and loved my job. It used to be a really great,fun place to work.
Whats really going on wrote on Apr 25, 2008 10:31 AM:
What is really meant by this statement: "...have left the company."?
Was this their decision or Lee Enterprises decision? From the articles that Kathy has written in the past, her passion and love for the community showed in each article. I doubt it was the publisher or editor's decision to leave.
Was this their decision or Lee Enterprises decision? From the articles that Kathy has written in the past, her passion and love for the community showed in each article. I doubt it was the publisher or editor's decision to leave.
Another Former Employee wrote on Apr 25, 2008 10:10 AM:
I'm a former employee as well, and I enjoyed working there before Lee Enterprises took over. We had fun employee picnics, awesome Christmas parties, a good laugh in the office occasionally and a good working relationship between departments for a while, but like many key employees, I took the opportunity to get out while I could and keep my dignity. The World Newspaper was a decent paper with informative news and good advertising. We were busy and we had good circulation numbers, but the changes that came with Lee were not good for this area. Maybe in Davenport Iowa they would have worked, but not here. It has been sad to see such constant turmoil on a daily basis and watch the quality of the newspaper be dragged down to the level it is today. I don't know if a private-owned paper is the answer, but the current corporate ownership needs to go. Too many private owned papers are just rags that people line their bird cages with and they don't have the financial backing to compete or provide what's needed in a community this size.
Just Me wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:55 AM:
I am former employee as well, and I loved my job there. I don't know how long ago you worked there or what dept. you were in, but that was at one job I looked forward to getting up and going to. We had a good time. I still have many friends still working there. Those who did not have any fun working there, chose not to have fun. We had company picnics every year that were fun. We had weekly picnics at the beach. Several people came out and had hotdogs and beverages. But that was until Lee took over. The changes that came with that were very overwhelming and over-powering. All of a sudden key employees were having to leave.
I will say that I always had a very high level of respect for Kathy Erickson and I always will. Good Luck Kathy!!
I will say that I always had a very high level of respect for Kathy Erickson and I always will. Good Luck Kathy!!
Whatever wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:52 AM:
The World has been going downhill for so long, I can't remember when it was a Good Newspaper. For the price and the amount of pages we get, it's a joke. THE ONLY REASON WE GET IT, IS FOR THE "LETTERS TO THE EDITOR" to see what local folks are thinking, and for the obituaries to see if our name is there yet.
Since we don't get the Oregonian delivered in our area anymore, we have to get the Register Guard (which we don't like either) and The World, IF we want to read a newspaper, which we do enjoy doing. But gosh, the content of the World is about as good as the "Good Morning" papers they put in cafes everyday, consisting of two pages.
Give us a DECENT NEWSPAPER or sell out and let someone who knows how to run a newspaper buy it.
We are news starved around here...
Since we don't get the Oregonian delivered in our area anymore, we have to get the Register Guard (which we don't like either) and The World, IF we want to read a newspaper, which we do enjoy doing. But gosh, the content of the World is about as good as the "Good Morning" papers they put in cafes everyday, consisting of two pages.
Give us a DECENT NEWSPAPER or sell out and let someone who knows how to run a newspaper buy it.
We are news starved around here...
Mary Schamehorn wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:42 AM:
This is a sad day for journalism on the South Coast. Kathy Erickson has devoted her life to this newspaper, and she should not suffer because of a downturn in the economy. I worked more than 40 years for the Bandon Western World, which was owned by my grandfather for 50 years. How sad that such an upheaval has taken place that so directly affects all 3 papers.
Former World employee wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:39 AM:
I don't know anyone who went to work at the World and enjoyed it, from 20 years ago until now. It would be a wonderful thing if this paper went out of business because this area is too big not to have a paper--a local one would be started. I have a journalism degree and 20 years experience, and I can't wait for a real newspaper.
Just Me wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:13 AM:
Wow, didn't take them long to remove Kathy's blog roll. They have done this in past with other key employees, and although change is sometimes good, the paper has gone downhill. From advertising to quality, since Lee took over and started running it from Iowa.
The local "leaders" had no say in things. The world and theworldlink.com has been micro-managed since Lee bought it. They've had managers in the business office that chased off tenured employees and provided no support. They've had such a big turnover in three years it's crazy. People used to go to work and enjoy it and be able to talk and laugh with fellow employees and they felt good because they knew they were producing a good product. it was a nice place to work. And then along came Lee......big city ideas with no common sense.
The local "leaders" had no say in things. The world and theworldlink.com has been micro-managed since Lee bought it. They've had managers in the business office that chased off tenured employees and provided no support. They've had such a big turnover in three years it's crazy. People used to go to work and enjoy it and be able to talk and laugh with fellow employees and they felt good because they knew they were producing a good product. it was a nice place to work. And then along came Lee......big city ideas with no common sense.
Phil wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:10 AM:
Reality,
You're right. That was an overly kind and conservative estimate.
You're right. That was an overly kind and conservative estimate.
Phil wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:09 AM:
Beebsie,
If you don't agree with the truth, where oh where are you ever going to get your news? Just go back to watching Fox News. I'd tell you to get a grip on reality, but it's clear you don't want one.
If you don't agree with the truth, where oh where are you ever going to get your news? Just go back to watching Fox News. I'd tell you to get a grip on reality, but it's clear you don't want one.
REALITY wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:06 AM:
PHIL boy that's positive giving them two years. Lee obviously does not care about the community or the people that work for them. Ask anyone that still works there the last time they received a raise or any type of compensation for the work they've done or how many of them still have to go to the food bank on a weekly basis to feed their families. It's all about "Yes" men and hitting numbers, not about supporting the community and the people that work for them.
Phil wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:01 AM:
Cramming two full-time top level management positions into one job will lead to better performance and responsiveness to the community? More likely you will have one editor/publisher who either focuses on one or the other (their area of expertise) but not both. I fail to see how that even pans out. This is just another move by Lee to cut costs at the expense of OUR community newspaper. I think the place is going to be a laundry mat within two years.
Whateva wrote on Apr 25, 2008 9:00 AM:
You're still going to see the same type of newstories. Maybe it's not what people want to hear, but it's the news. And they make mistakes just like everyone else in this world, but unlike most, they correct them and admit they were wrong. There have been so many changes since Lee took over the paper, it's unreal. And not necessarily for the good. Too much "corporate" and not enough "local".
beebsie wrote on Apr 25, 2008 8:49 AM:
With the forthcoming new personnel now maybe we will get the unbiased local news.
Susan wrote on Apr 25, 2008 8:45 AM:
What in the world are they thinking? By the end of 2009 all three newspaper will be bankrupt and there will be no daily newspaper for the Southern Oregon Coast. Big Cities people come and think they know the way to run small town papers, but they will be sorely disappointed when all this comes to a head.
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines