Port renews auditor, plans Charleston paving

By Elise Hamner, City Editor
Friday, April 11, 2008 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
Staff at the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay are talking about budgets these days, but they’ve had their minds on auditors this spring, too.

The agency starts its public budgeting process this month to set parameters for spending and revenues for the fiscal year that starts July 1. The first public meeting of the port’s budget committee is set for 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, April 30, in the port offices, 125 Central Ave., in Coos Bay.

But first things first.

The agency recently re-appointed Scoville and Reiber CPA PC as its auditor of record. The Coos Bay firm, which has audited port finances since 2002, was among four companies that sent in bids. According to the port, they included:

* Scoville & Reiber: $25,800;

* Wall & Wall PC CPAs, Coos Bay: $19,865;

* Pauly Rodgers & Co., Tigard: $25,300; and

* Steve Tuchscherer CPA, Roseburg: $15,500.

At the port commission’s March 20 meeting, Commissioner Caddy McKeown was the first to mention the cost.

“Obviously Scoville & Reiber is the most expensive there. I’d like some explanation,” McKeown said.

The port is not required to accept the lowest bid, and in this case the bid by Steve Tuchscherer CPA didn’t meet specifications, said Mike Gaul, the port’s deputy executive director. He went on to explain that port staff want an auditor who’s not only a phone call away, but nearby enough to show up at port offices throughout the year, too. That eliminated the Tigard firm. In the final analysis, it came down to hours.

Scoville & Reiber estimated its staff would spend 358 hours auditing port records, while Wall & Wall came up with 48 fewer hours. Gaul said staff felt that since Wall & Wall is not familiar with ongoing projects, it would have a learning curve that would use up some hours, leaving less time for the actual auditing. And should the accountants go over the not-to-exceed cap, the port would be charged for the extra work on an hourly basis.   

“If the numbers go up, the costs go up,” Gaul told commissioners.

That led port staff to the recommendation.

When it went to a vote, the commission opted for Scoville & Reiber. Commissioner Jerry Hampel abstained from the discussion and vote declaring a conflict of interest.

Charleston roadwork

Also in March, the port commission OK’d a low bid of $238,932 from Laskey-Clifton Corp. for upgrades at the Charleston Marina. The project would entail traffic and parking improvements in the outer basin. The crew would pave Eel Avenue and do paving drainage work behind Seahawk Seafood.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Holly wrote on Apr 12, 2008 8:07 AM:

It's nice to see our paper reporting on the March 20 Port meeting in a timely manner. The next meeting is in five days, on Thursday, April 17. Anybody want to bet on when the coverage of that meeting appears?

Gene wrote on Apr 11, 2008 12:26 PM:

Comments? Go to the Forums and read the article on the Port and see what others think. That article says it all.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections