Group forms to discuss wave energy

By Susan Chambers, Staff Writer
Sunday, March 23, 2008 | 3 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COOS BAY — Fishermen, port officials and other interests want potential wave energy companies to consider the “source.”

“Source” is the acronym pronunciation for the Southern Oregon Ocean Resource Coalition — SOORC — a group of about a dozen folks who gathered for the first time Friday to talk about wave energy.

That was one goal.

The other was to hear what Ocean Power Technologies representative Steve Kopf had to say.

It’s been a little more than two weeks since South Coast interests found out OPT, under the name of Oregon Wave Energy Partners I LLC, filed a preliminary application document with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a 200-buoy wave energy facility off the North Spit — up from the 20 Kopf reported the company was planning in January.

Kopf’s words were like a mantra: “I’m sorry,” he said.

He said the same thing at a Wednesday meeting at the Port of Umpqua in Reedsport and reiterated the change was made on short notice at OPT’s headquarters in New Jersey.

It was made in three days’ time, he said. He was finally able to get the go-ahead to call folks out here, including Oregon Dungeness Crab Commission Executive Director Nick Furman, Oregon International Port of Coos Bay Deputy Director Mike Gaul and Coos County Commissioner John Griffith, on the day the application was filed with FERC.

“I knew when I made those calls, we’d have this meeting,” Kopf said, “and it wasn’t going to be pretty. ... I know what you’re saying: I broke the trust.”

Gaul agreed.

“I have a highly disappointed port commission,” he said.

The process, in effect, has reverted back to where it was months ago, Gaul said.

“Here’s Day One again. It has to start with open, honest discussion from now on,” he said.

Kopf and the rest of the group discussed several more details of the project and brainstormed some ideas that should be talked about at future meetings. The meeting covered some issues that had been covered before but that, in the minds of many on SOORC, particularly fishermen, needed to be covered again.

“This is the political reality,” Sen. Joanne Verger, D-Coos Bay, said to Kopf, underscoring her seriousness by tapping a finger on the table. “Understand that the fishing industry has been here long before wave energy. It has tradition, support. There’s a lot of sensitivity to this industry from Brookings to Astoria.”

Part of the OPT preliminary application calls for use of the traditional licensing process, as opposed to an integrated licensing process, the FERC default, or an alternative licensing process (see sidebar). Interested parties have 30 days in which to respond to FERC.

That was one of the main topics for which SOORC hoped Kopf could help.

We need more time, Gaul said.

SOORC needs to consider carefully the ramifications of supporting any of the three processes and would Kopf support SOORC’s request to FERC for a 90-day extension?

Kopf agreed.

Several times, he was surprised at the level of thoughtfulness and concern evidenced by some of the fishermen’s comments.

“It’s good to have that,” Kopf said after the meeting at the Port of Coos Bay. “I thought it was productive. I’m looking forward to working with a professionally organized and thoughtful group.”

The fishermen and local community officials agreed that SOORC needs to do some things to become a nonprofit organization, but that will happen.

In the meantime, there still is wave energy work to do.

“One thing you did, you got us together,” salmon troller Paul Heikkila said.
Tags »
Wave energy application processes


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has three ways for which a company can apply for a wave energy — also called hydrokinetic — license: integrated, the default process; traditional and alternative.


The integrated licensing process is intended to streamline FERC’s licensing process by providing a predictable, efficient and timely licensing process that continues to ensure adequate resource protections. The efficiencies expected to be achieved through the process are founded in three fundamental principles:


n identifying issues early and resolving studies needed to fill information gaps, avoiding studies post-filing;


n integrating other stakeholder permitting process needs; and


n establishing time frames to complete process steps for all stakeholders, including the commission.


The traditional licensing process includes a three-stage pre-filing consultation process on behalf of the applicant. The traditional process, which Ocean Power Technologies has requested, is paper-driven, has no FERC involvement during the development stages. The company’s study plans are developed based on early agency and tribal recommendations.


The alternative licensing process relies on more collaboration among parties than the other two. It is designed to improve communication among affected entities, according to the FERC Web site. An applicant can, using the alternative process, combine the pre-filing consultation process and environmental review processes under the National Environmental Policy Act and other statutes, and also allow for the preparation of a preliminary draft environmental assessment by an applicant or an environmental impact statement by a contractor chosen by the commission and funded by the applicant.

For more information, those interested can visit the FERC Web site at http://www.ferc.gov.


— Staff Writer Susan Chambers
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Dave wrote on Mar 24, 2008 8:36 AM:

As a concerned citizen, I find it intolerable that Oregon - a supposedly progressive state - is putting the interest of crab fisherman before the welfare of all living creatures on the planet.

This is neither economically or environmentally sound thinking.

Joe six pack wrote on Mar 23, 2008 4:47 PM:

Ocean power technologies, There strategy is to sell turnkey power stations and to obtain long term contracts from us, There costomers for the operation and maitenance of these wave power buoys. The PB150 power buoy has not been tested but maybe in place in Orkney Scotland by the first half of 2008. If the power buoys need to be removed for maintenance and replaced every twelve months this will cost more then thay will make!

Gene wrote on Mar 22, 2008 7:01 PM:

OK, I see why the fishermen are concerned but why is the Port of Coos Bay involved? They don't own the ocean or the right-a-way the power lines will travel, or have they managed to acquire more land without the taxpayers being told? Why is that every time anything goes on in this area, the Port has to get their nose in it?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections