Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Paul wrote on Mar 2, 2008 8:24 PM:
ann wrote on Feb 28, 2008 9:38 PM:
Coos Bay "lifer" girl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 4:27 PM:
COMMON SENSE wrote on Feb 23, 2008 3:41 PM:
I wonder IF the restaurant was owned by a NB council member would something had been done already to fix this accident waiting to happen? I guess NB council members never heard of the saying "A ounce of prevention is worth a pound of CURE"....
Mike wrote on Feb 22, 2008 12:14 PM:
Mary wrote on Feb 15, 2008 3:10 AM:
ann wrote on Feb 10, 2008 7:05 PM:
Too Many College kids??? wrote on Feb 8, 2008 8:49 AM:
Many of these 'college' kids pay tuition, pay rent, work here, buy food and clothing, and pay for entertainment in this area. Too many???? I say too few! These 'college' kids help our economy. No college kids = No SOCC = No affordable education = no faculty = less area income = lower economy. I welcome the college kids! Gives the area a much needed breath of fresh air!
Coos Bay Citizen wrote on Feb 7, 2008 12:22 PM:
Eugene Hill Sapphires owner wrote on Feb 7, 2008 12:03 PM:
Eugene Hill.
Astoria wrote on Feb 7, 2008 7:52 AM:
Ican'tbeleiveit wrote on Feb 7, 2008 1:08 AM:
Just Thinking wrote on Feb 6, 2008 12:51 PM:
I was very disappointing to see the city put off demolishing the home over money and the safety of its citizens. We all know that the hill slid, but the house could have easily came down too. The city should have erred on the side of safety.
Mr. Hill the owner of the resturant conducted himself in the most professional manner and was more than patient with the city. After all the city issued permits for everything.
Maybe it is time for some changes in the management of the city of North Bend. We need professionals that know what they are doing. Not want-a-be's that are members of the club.
Bob wrote on Feb 6, 2008 10:39 AM:
Also, removing the house is not going to stop the hill from sliding.
Common Sense? wrote on Feb 6, 2008 1:54 AM:
Elizabeth wrote on Feb 5, 2008 11:25 PM:
According to the neighbors of the house in question, it was the PREVIOUS owner who cut down the trees - not Mr. Guirado who is being suddenly the villain here.
http://www.theworldlink.com/articles/2008/01/24/news/doc4798d818d8e32549087357.txt
I happen to love Sapphire's and eat there frequently, but I fail to see how this is the present homeowner's fault and sole responsibility. Mr. Guirado never issued the restaurant permit, nor did he draw up the construction plans, dig up earth around the base, OR take out the trees.
The whole thing is sad and a result of horrible planning IMO. I feel for both sides.
ann wrote on Feb 5, 2008 8:45 PM:
just me wrote on Feb 5, 2008 2:01 PM:
concerned guy wrote on Feb 5, 2008 1:15 PM:
Nick wrote on Feb 5, 2008 10:23 AM:
MEGHAN wrote on Feb 5, 2008 9:42 AM:
Beyond Amazed !! wrote on Feb 5, 2008 8:25 AM:
CB person wrote on Feb 5, 2008 6:11 AM:
JJrunner wrote on Feb 4, 2008 9:49 PM:
Responsibility wrote on Feb 4, 2008 9:31 PM:
Life isn't fair and we all do stupid things. Some of us can't afford the best parcel of land to build a home on or business. We all have to make a living and we all need a roof over our head unless we are ducks (not Duck fans). I hope all parties involved are insured or were able to plan for the worst no matter how inevitable this all seemed to the rest of us arm chair quarterbacks.
As for the City of North Bend I can only hope everything was done in good faith. Since other businesses have such a hard time settling here perhaps a corner was cut or a short cut was taken. Sometimes you may have to take a chance to give somebody an opportunity to live the dream.
What about those folks who were employed at the resteraunt? Do we say they deserved the outcome? To the homeowner do we walk up to that person or family and say "It serves you right"? What about the neighbors? This won't be the last slide here. Ground water at the base of the hill will continue to undermine the hill until there is no more hill. Wind and water caused erosion will flatten this hill.
My advice with be to condemn all the homes on that side of the street and allow nature to take it's course. The folks nearby need to be given notice that they will need to be prepared to leave their homes. Perhaps this could be considered some kind of disaster and relief money could reimburse home owners so they could relocate.
Just An Observer wrote on Feb 4, 2008 8:49 PM:
Cry havoc and let loose the dogs of law...LOL! The lawyers are going to have a field day with this mess!
COOS BAY NATIVE wrote on Feb 4, 2008 8:25 PM:
North Bender wrote on Feb 4, 2008 8:00 PM:
Joe six pack wrote on Feb 4, 2008 7:42 PM:
Coos Bay Kid wrote on Feb 4, 2008 7:10 PM:
Tony wrote on Feb 4, 2008 6:50 PM:
boo freakin hoo wrote on Feb 4, 2008 6:47 PM:
onnonomous wrote on Feb 4, 2008 5:09 PM:
I remember an old house at the bottom of the hill to the left of the restaurant that is there now...that became a victim of that same sliding hill.....
so WHY would someone build there, right under that same spot?, then cry "foul"?
fubar wrote on Feb 4, 2008 3:56 PM:
Lynn G. wrote on Feb 4, 2008 2:43 PM:
Y.M.M. wrote on Feb 4, 2008 2:42 PM:
Bucket O' Bolts wrote on Feb 4, 2008 2:23 PM:
Anyone who has lived on this planet can tell you if you clear a hill, it will slide. And Mr. Yesi Guirado is responsible how?
NB1 wrote on Feb 4, 2008 2:14 PM:
Citzen of Coos Bay wrote on Feb 4, 2008 1:57 PM:
With all the struggles this town has had with keeping businesses open in our area due to the economy...this is just crazy and just another reason why our area is just stagnet!! This homeowner has been allowed to dictate to the city his agenda and timeline of taking care of things when he is good darn and ready. I guess we're just lucky that no one was hurt by this weekends landslide.
Question for Everyone wrote on Feb 4, 2008 1:49 PM:
Elizabeth wrote on Feb 4, 2008 1:48 PM:
I hope someone does get a lawyer involved. Whoever did the planning for that site gave Mr. Hill very bad "expertise" in my opinion. Of course a hill is going to be unstable when you carve into the very bottom of it and strip away all the trees.
Did Mr. Guirado do this? I don't think so. Yet now he's the one being forced to eat major expense to fix something he clearly didn't cause, and Mr. Hill & his planners obviously didn't think about.
With all due respect, I don't know that it's the homeowner that should be getting vilified here, and I'm shocked at the amount of comments from people on here immediately jumping on Mr. Guirado and the city, instead of whoever it was that thought taking a big dip from the bottom of a (now) treeless slope was ever a good idea.
WORLD READER wrote on Feb 4, 2008 1:10 PM:
Stunned yet again by CB wrote on Feb 4, 2008 12:51 PM:
coos bayianian wrote on Feb 4, 2008 12:49 PM:
nbcity is to blame wrote on Feb 4, 2008 12:47 PM:
music guy wrote on Feb 4, 2008 12:26 PM:
loyal customer wrote on Feb 4, 2008 11:46 AM:
Customer wrote on Feb 4, 2008 10:50 AM:
Cecilia wrote on Feb 4, 2008 10:33 AM:
Mr. Hill I hope you have a good attorney and good insurance because I can see you needing them now.
The World has been great about providing coverage on this matter. Thank You





The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines