Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Dennis wrote on Feb 28, 2008 9:46 PM:
Last year in Ashland, Oregon, they had a family who would panhandle during the day and sleep at one of Ashland's most expensive and plush hotels at night.
In the last two years in both Grants Pass and Medford,there have been panhandlers killed over the rights to panhandle at certain intersections.
Roseburg did an outstanding job when the panhandlers started taking over their city. They enacted a city ordinance regarding motorist handing out money from the roadway. If a motorist in Roseburg is caught handing out a donation to a panhandler from their vehicle, they get a $70.00 fine. After Roseburg enacted this ordinance, 70% of the panhandlers disappeared.
But, if you do not want to enact a city ordiance such as Roseburg did, there is already a law on the books which works just as well. You see there is nothing like a $242.00 ticket for unlawful stopping / standing in the roadway. I promise you, after you issue the kind hearted liberal a citation for $242.00, even they will think twice before giving money to another panhandler. And plus, who needs the money more, the panhandler or the state? at least the state will not be spending it on beer!.
ann wrote on Feb 28, 2008 9:35 PM:
boobers wrote on Feb 26, 2008 3:05 PM:
boobers wrote on Feb 26, 2008 3:02 PM:
Groovester wrote on Feb 22, 2008 7:51 PM:
But look at the advantages, no schedule, no boss and no drug testing! I would say the above numbers probably present a more accurate picture of what they get. I mean, if you stood out in the rain all day and only got $4, would you go fly a sign again? I also think the $300/day thing is pretty rare, I have heard of occasional instances of days like that, but usually in conjunction with an unusual circumstance, like being on the way to the Duck game, or having a person who hands over $100 bill.
Rocco St. Bruno wrote on Feb 22, 2008 4:59 PM:
Michael wrote on Feb 21, 2008 10:28 PM:
I kinda wonder what's worse a drug dealer or street pan handler...both are working the public for their hard earned money from working? Kinda ranks right up there with worrying about steroid use in baseball in late 1980's & early 1990's when there were NO rules against it at the time? Interesting how people worry about everything else but their OWN life short falls...
Eve Ning wrote on Feb 21, 2008 10:17 PM:
Rick wrote on Feb 21, 2008 5:29 PM:
Big Mike Hanson wrote on Feb 21, 2008 5:25 PM:
Unfortunately there are people like this in society that view this as far better than a positive, strong work ethic and a clear conscience.
Paul wrote on Feb 20, 2008 10:47 PM:
Paul wrote on Feb 20, 2008 10:28 PM:
ann wrote on Feb 18, 2008 9:45 PM:
TB wrote on Feb 17, 2008 6:18 AM:
Jim wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:43 PM:
coastalfriend wrote on Feb 15, 2008 7:15 PM:
But do not ask for handouts from people who are working hard to pay their bills.
What if we all stood out there asking for others money instead of working, just imagine.
People are just enabling them to continue to not take responibilty.
JJrunner wrote on Feb 15, 2008 9:10 AM:
You call others self-righteous do-gooders because they suggest that homeless might use aide that is available to them? Your post is just another that fall into the "let's blame the goverment for everything!" category. People have free will and do not have to be "slaves to corporatism and its endless influence and money."
Blaming the goverment is usually just a convenient excuse for laziness.
Apachuwarrior wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:29 PM:
Sure the quandary we find ourselves in began with Reaganomics but also continued with Big Bill and the 1996 Welfare Reform Act, which forced many good and honest, but uneducated, poor people to try to eek a decent life on minimum wage. These people do work hard, but never get ahead in our age of consumerism. Both political parties are to blame as is our individualistic mantra. The truth is that both parties are slaves to corporatism and its endless influence and money.
When a society refuses to care for its "downtrodden" but can spend the majority of tax revenue on bullets and bombs, something is very wrong with our culture. When people get jealous of a panhandler who makes $300 a day, then people have become intolerant. Hooray for them if it is true. But I personally do not believe beggars earn that much money, and a "police survey" I would hardly call scientific. This fallacy perpetuates itself by ignorant people – as the posts indicate - who actually believe the drug addicted and mentally ill people earn that much cash everyday!
Yes of course there are individuals who will take advantage of the system. This happens in all socio-economic classes. Enron comes to mind, as does Oil speculators who gouge the American public for profit. But people still give their money to them. What's the difference between being extorted and giving it away? At least giving the money to a panhandler makes me feel good. Isn't that what giving is suppose to do? Why ask why or where the money goes? That is missing the point of giving. But people want to give in a structured manner. What has that got us? Empty food co-ops and professional panhandlers.
The paper quoted an expert - a director of housing and emergency services at South Coast Community Action. His advice was to not give panhandlers any money because, "they are there for the money and the money is there to feed their addictions." Of course they are there for the money and what's the difference if their addiction is crack, alcohol or food? More's mindset smells condescending and from a self-righteous do-gooder. Give them shelter vouchers as More said?
I would ask Mr. More if he ever stayed in one of the shelters he thinks is such a good idea. The shelter system plagued with problems and there are time limits on how long a person can stay in one. Ever live in the shelter system you champion Mr. More? I suspect not.
However Mr. More continued with a disclaimer that NOT all panhandlers are druggies, but rather mentally ill and in need of treatment. And that they will not seek treatment if they are given money. "These are broken people who will never be able to hold a job," he said. "They need disability payments."
Well finally something quasi-intelligent from an "expert" in emergency services. But I would add, does Mr. More think he could live on disability payments and have some sense of a dignified life?
What people forget is that if the moochers are drug addicts and need the money to get their fix, and if no one gave them money, what would they do? Steal and rob? I think it is fair to assume they would. So then they go to jail/prison. Many readers would say that is where they belong. But what is the cost/loss ratio to house a beggar druggie at the county or state's expense? I will tell you it is a lot more than $300 a day. And that expense comes out of everyone's wallet.
It’s time people stop thinking of the panhandler's mechanics and look at their elected leaders and the social services provided that are woefully inadequate. The governments answer of charity and NGO picking up the slack is an erroneous belief. Stop trying to treat the symptoms of a sick society and radically attack the ill itself.
For The Humane Treatment of All Sentient Beings wrote on Feb 13, 2008 11:05 AM:
JB wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:38 AM:
coastalfriend wrote on Feb 12, 2008 5:50 PM:
It broke my fantasy after five turned me down. Not even hard work.
annoyed wrote on Feb 12, 2008 3:12 PM:
COLFAX wrote on Feb 12, 2008 9:12 AM:
What methodology was used to obtain these “local averages”? Where can this data be viewed…right wing fantasyland?
Insert name wrote on Feb 11, 2008 5:09 PM:
I've noticed many CB/NB people do this public assistance thing. I'm sure many could teach a class on how to rip off the local, state and federal government.
coastal friend wrote on Feb 11, 2008 1:02 PM:
Put it to the test yourself, next time offer them work for pay, see what happens.
It is reality, not fantasy.
Johnny 5 wrote on Feb 11, 2008 10:04 AM:
COLFAX wrote on Feb 10, 2008 10:03 PM:
Sounds like another undocumented right wing fantasy. Must have been listening to the “The Jim Bice Show” one too many times.
coastal friend wrote on Feb 10, 2008 2:34 PM:
Many of them turn down offers to work for the money by the people who give.
Try giving them food, most want the money instead.
Then there are those who do this for a real job, live in nicer homes and drive better cars than those who give them money. Tourists have said they do not like the element this creates and will not return to our area. This hurts business and residents alike.
Colfax wrote on Feb 10, 2008 5:23 AM:
COLFAX wrote on Feb 9, 2008 5:21 PM:
Chato wrote on Feb 9, 2008 4:15 PM:
For The Humane Treatment of All Sentient Beings wrote on Feb 9, 2008 11:05 AM:
Jim wrote on Feb 8, 2008 1:34 PM:
LYING AGAIN????? wrote on Feb 8, 2008 9:30 AM:
Take Care OF yourself wrote on Feb 8, 2008 2:08 AM:
Too Bad wrote on Feb 7, 2008 7:04 PM:
NB Native wrote on Feb 7, 2008 3:15 PM:
Alternates wrote on Feb 7, 2008 9:57 AM:
EAGLES PERCH wrote on Feb 6, 2008 8:19 PM:
MEGHAN wrote on Feb 6, 2008 7:45 AM:
reedsgirl wrote on Feb 5, 2008 10:52 PM:
KM wrote on Feb 5, 2008 9:49 PM:
2. You can rob banks and make more money than most jobs provide in this area...
3. You can sell meth and make more money than most jobs provide in this area.
Now what kind of bragging rights do any of these "professions" grant? We should treat each of these activities with an equal amount of disdain and treat it accordingly. I wonder if any of these people are actually "proud" of the "work" that they do each day?
ann wrote on Feb 5, 2008 9:21 PM:
ann wrote on Feb 5, 2008 9:12 PM:
JIm wrote on Feb 5, 2008 5:37 PM:
Don't you find it ironic that people stand outside of businesses asking for help when help is right inside in the form of jobs? If you are hungry, pride has no place.
Cindi wrote on Feb 5, 2008 2:20 PM:
A.R. wrote on Feb 5, 2008 2:02 PM:
I remember in Seattle a few years ago a radio station disk jockey played a part of a panhandler for one day. He raised over 200.00 in one day. Give your money to a charatible organization and get a tax reciept...in a way, you are going to give twice to these guys/gals by giving them money on the street corner. For one, they are getting some sort of assistance check from the Government and now you give them more of your money. Why? Dont feel sorry for them. They put themselves on that street corner, and make themselves look worse then they are. If they say they are a Veteran. Most likely they are lieing and tell them to go see the County Veterans Service Officer.
Coos Bay Shopper wrote on Feb 1, 2008 5:43 PM:
pretty soon, all the store clerks will be out of the store and on the streetcorners, with signs, ha ha ha ....
Jim wrote on Feb 1, 2008 8:57 AM:
Meghan wrote on Feb 1, 2008 8:01 AM:
don't give them cash
treat the person with respect
realize that (just like people who are not homeless or panhandling) people and problems are not all the same, and can't all be solved in the same ways
take precautions for your own safety if you feel threatened
encourage them to get help through local organizations (knowing what these are is great for your community if you really are concerned)
support those organizations that you become familiar with
buy them a healthy meal, a bag of dog food (if they have a dog with them), or something else that is useful but not feeding an addiction
Mary wrote on Jan 31, 2008 10:16 PM:
Rick James wrote on Jan 31, 2008 2:02 PM:
Let me rephrase this for you since it is unclear to you and you say addiction means there is no choice. The choice is in the very begining before there is an addiction. These people choose to partake in drug activity that they know will inevitably lead to addiction and troubles if they continue on that path. So even though you may think addiction is not a choice, the choice to avoid addiction comes first.
Tim wrote on Jan 31, 2008 1:35 PM:
SPEAK FOR YOURSELF wrote on Jan 31, 2008 11:48 AM:
Addiction itself is not a choice....choosing to do something ABOUT it is. Or, you can just throw your hands up, complain that there just arent enough resources available, and continue living as an addict.
The fact is that every single panhandler I have ever encountered, when I ask them if they want to do some work in exchange for a meal, ALWAYS says "NO". Now what does THAT have to do with addiction, lack of housing, etc?
Laziness is the operative word here. If we could weed out the lazy ones, perhaps there would be sufficient resources available for those that truly do suffer from mental illness.
so please, spare us your condescending attitude. The fact is that many many panhandlers are NOT addicted and are NOT mentally ill - just lazy.
If you like, I can define lazy for you.......
amazed wrote on Jan 31, 2008 10:43 AM:
First, a vocabulary lesson. Addiction means there is no choice. Moreover, clearly mental illness is not a choice.
Second, there are no mental health services available in this county without an OHP card, which an adult can currently get a chance in a lottery to get. Half a million Oregonians do not have heath insurance, and OHP covers about 19,000 currently, although that number is going to be slowly and slightly raised with the ongoing lottery system.
Third, making it on the services available is much more difficult then most people seem to think. Even if you fight all the way through the Social Security Administration and get disability the average check is around $600/month. That hardly pays rent in this area. Not to mention toiletries (which are not covered by food stamps), clothing, etc.
Fourth, just FYI there is not enough low income housing or housing vouchers available, and the housing vouchers available are often difficult to use because landlords will not take them, or the housing will not pass a basic livability inspection.
Just a bunch of "Parrots" wrote on Jan 30, 2008 8:54 PM:
Joe Six pack wrote on Jan 30, 2008 7:52 PM:
Rick James wrote on Jan 30, 2008 3:56 PM:
Rick James wrote on Jan 30, 2008 3:42 PM:
Jim wrote on Jan 30, 2008 1:51 PM:
After reading a lot about the matter in a variety of places, I can only conclude that a good many panhandlers CHOOSE to be non-productive members of society.
The problem is, people that spout that we should give them money are only doing so to make THEMSELVES feel good..."look at me..I am compassionate" without realizing they are only furthering the quagmire these individuals are in. Give them money, you are not helping them a bit. Just yourself.
JOE wrote on Jan 30, 2008 1:20 PM:
JJrunner wrote on Jan 30, 2008 1:12 PM:
empathetic wrote on Jan 30, 2008 12:30 PM:
Jim wrote on Jan 30, 2008 11:47 AM:
Catman wrote on Jan 30, 2008 10:10 AM:
empathetic wrote on Jan 30, 2008 9:49 AM:
To others (Jim and Kitty in particular), why is it okay to stereotype everyone on the street asking for money?
Each person is an individual with an individual story. I am amazed with today’s culture if a “soccer-mom” is an addict it is a TV movie-of-the-week (and everyone realizes how hard it is to get and stay sober), but if he or she doesn’t happen to be part of an affluent, supportive family, they are an “eyesore.” That is just plain not fair, judgmental and wrong.
Talk to these individuals. Some have very valid reasons for not seeking shelter that is available, for example, having a pet they are not willing to part with. Yes, that is right; they would rather live on the street with their dog then in a shelter that will not take it. Some of you would make the same choice, if forced to. Even if you would not, what gives you the right to judge their decision.
1 wrote on Jan 30, 2008 9:43 AM:
EAGLES PERCH wrote on Jan 30, 2008 9:36 AM:
always been a coos bay girl wrote on Jan 30, 2008 8:20 AM:
Lisa wrote on Jan 30, 2008 7:44 AM:
Jim wrote on Jan 30, 2008 7:23 AM:
Suggestion wrote on Jan 30, 2008 1:45 AM:
My point is that although drug and alcohol problems do account for some homelessness, those are not the only reasons. Although money may be the motivator for some, it is hard for me to believe the numbers quoted in this article.
Having said all that, would you wish homelessness on anyone in this weather? I've lived here for quite a while but I worked in a shelter in the last state I lived in. We used a National Guard Armory and housed over 100 men, women and children each night, during the winter. There was a container truck with sleeping mats outside the door and next to it was a container with food. Some of the supplies were state subsidized and some were donations. We served dinner and then breakfast in the morning. Referrals were made for medical attention and suggestions were made for various forms of rehabilitation. The shelter closed at 7 am. We cleaned the facility and turned it back over to the Army. 5 pm we did it all over again.
I saw some folks get back on track, some stay the same and some die. It was far from perfect but it was well worth the effort.
There are a lot of folks sleeping in the woods tonight. You don't have to give them money. How about giving them a choice.
Kitty wrote on Jan 29, 2008 11:21 PM:
The panhandlers are an eyesore to people in CB/NB and should not be allowed to stand on corners with signs. They need to stop drinking, doing drugs and get jobs like the rest of us!
Do something about it wrote on Jan 29, 2008 8:05 PM:
FLIPSIDE wrote on Jan 29, 2008 4:03 PM:
Not a salary wrote on Jan 29, 2008 1:29 PM:
Most likely that was near or around the holidays when people are generally more generous; not a steady income.
Did the writer of the article actually interview anyone who panhandles? It does not sound like it. Most of the information on who the panhandlers are and or why they panhandle is third hand information. Not straight from the source. What bad reporting.
reality please!!?? wrote on Jan 29, 2008 1:21 PM:
Could help to do a little more fact checking generally.
Jason wrote on Jan 29, 2008 1:05 PM:
Joyfull wrote on Jan 29, 2008 12:31 PM:
compiled all their data. I was shocked! This is exactly why I do not give to panhandlers! They make more than I do and I work hard for what little money I get to take home.
onnonomous wrote on Jan 29, 2008 12:30 PM:
Fred wrote on Jan 29, 2008 12:11 PM:







The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines