The owner of the house at 2505 Sheridan Ave, Yesi Guirado, has said he would comply with North Bend City Council orders as of Wednesday. - World Photo by Madeline Steege
NORTH BEND — The city plans to wait an additional 30 days before making a decision on what to do with a dangerous house perched on a slipping slope above U.S. Highway 101 and an Asian eatery.
Discussed during the North Bend City Council meeting Tuesday, the home, owned by Yesi Guirado of Englewood, is in no danger of falling in the near future, councilors said. And despite failures to do so in the past, Guirado now has complied with city orders. The 30-day extension ends at the council’s meeting on Feb. 26.
At a council meeting Jan. 8, Guirado was ordered to cordon off the house, located at 2505 Sheridan Ave., to prevent access by unauthorized people; and to direct all drainage from the house off the slide zone to prevent water from worsening the slide. The measures were suggested by Bill Galli, the principal engineer of the Galli Group in Grants Pass, who was hired by the city to give an independent opinion about the stability of the slope and home.
According to a fact-finding document from the city, the owner was required to take these remedial measures to improve slope stability and ensure public safety at the site.
During a public hearing Tuesday, City Engineer Matt Whitty said he met with Guirado at the site that day and found he had begun immediate work on connecting two of the home’s drainage pipes to a flexible pipe that extends past the slide mass toward a catch basin below the house and next to Sapphires Mongolian Grill. The third is directed into a natural drainage north of the slide, Whitty said. Guirado also put up fencing on the north side of the house and is attempting to deal with the south side. He said the owner also installed no trespassing signs on the property.
Whitty said there is evidence of the hill’s further slippage, which has occurred intermittently since 2005.
“By my observation, the slide mass has moved considerably in the past few weeks,” Whitty said.
Mayor Rick Wetherell asked if the work meant that Guirado fully complied with city orders. Whitty replied that for the most part, yes, Guirado had complied but he needed to extend the drainage pipe to come closer to the catch basin.
Eugene Hill, the owner of Sapphires, said he wanted some closure, especially because he believes the possibility of the house falling had severely harmed his business since the issue first came before the City Council last February. At the time, city staff feared that the house could slide off the slope. Hill contends that this notion scared off his patrons.
“...This has been a year of not a lot of results for me,” Hill said, referring to past repeated attempts to convince the council to remedy the situation. “This isn’t over for you guys, either, because my best scenario is a few years out.”
Hill said he would not come back to a council meeting to discuss the issue again unless invited.
“I’ve read Machiavelli. This is politics, I get it,” Hill said.
Guirado, who attended the council meeting without his engineer Ralph Dunham of Stuntzner Engineering & Forestry LLC in Coos Bay, who has represented him in the past, said he could extend the drainage line, but was concerned that silt could clog it. He added he had no problems barricading his land but didn’t see the benefit in fencing it mid-way up the hill, where the property line begins, because the land is so soft and difficult to navigate.
After closing the public hearing, Wetherell emphasized that while the hill is in the city, it is not the city’s land, and characterized the entire situation as very complicated. He said the city was taking direction from the Galli report and believed the house was not in immediate danger of slipping.
“At this point, it would be my suggestion that we go with our report. ... His indication was that there is no imminent danger and that we cannot take further action until we reach the dry season,” Wetherell said, adding the house could not be removed until that point, nor could Guirado implement his plan to stabilize the slope with grouted soil nails.
Guirado’s plan, submitted to the city on Dec. 27, calls for a row of the nails to be placed into the hillside, which will be attached to a steel mesh to secure the property. It was prepared by PBS Engineering and Environmental, he said. PBS has several offices in Oregon, including one in Bandon.
Councilor Larry Garboden moved to postpone any decisions for 30 days, as long as Guirado continues to meet Galli’s recommendations and the city doesn’t see any imminent danger to Sapphires. Guirado also was asked to provide documentation stating how much the fix would cost and the time involved.
“We can’t move the house until August, anyway, so we have nothing,” added Councilor Janet Rubin.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
No deliberately false information.
No obscenity or racially offensive language.
No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
No information that invades another person's privacy.
No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.
Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Loyal CB business patron wrote on Jan 24, 2008 11:44 PM:
I think it's a terrible shame that South Coast cities, which are in such need of vibrant local businesses, fail to support those entrepreneurs in an issue that is entirely under city jurisdiction. As the TruNorth store and other local businesses fail due to a lack of loyal patrons, Sapphires' is reduced to hanging on by a thread despite the restaurant's early successes - not due to poor service, a miscalculation of customer needs or it's own business plans - but simply due to a nearby house that most likely will slip off the hilltop eventually and threatens the huge investment in this community. The construction of the Sapphires' building alone meant an infusion of funds and support was pumped into the local economy, in addition to employing several staff members, and other less visible ways of supporting the local economy. Customers in Coos Bay must remember to support local businesses, regardless of the illusion of safety - just because a location might not seem as safe as another choice, customers find it easy to forget it could easily be an earth quake or a tsunami that brings that house down - and in that case there are few other restaurants or businesses that would be any safer. Businesses without loyal patrons will certainly fail, as demonstrated by the closure of TruNorth. If loyal residents of Coos County didn't support the library district our libraries would be closed, like the ones in Jackson County - and unless North Bend residents would rather lose a unique eating experience in the local area - and all the benefits of a potentially successful restaurant - local customers better get a loyal conscience and the city better make a choice to stop letting a homeowner determine the fate of a restaurant on Highway 101.
House next door to south should be protected. City and adjacent landowner should see to that.
I would ask question again, already asked, why would the city zone property under a known slide to allow a building like a restaurant that can hold many people. Why wasn't that property listed as a slide danger zone?
"Too Close" in North Bend wrote on Jan 24, 2008 8:17 PM:
Only a few, who've been in a similar situation, can even begin to understand the stress of living next door to "the house". It's said that the property doesn't belong to the city, but the bottom line is that the city knew of the history of the property, and even after receiving a letter from us stating that no rezoning should occur down there because of the instability of the hill and the continual sliding on the north part of the property at 2505, the city went ahead and granted the permits for Eugene Hill to build the restaurant. Although there are those who say that the cutting of all the trees and brush down by the previous owner of 2505 didn't have anything to do with the big slide, it's amazing that all that land held from 1981 until over about a year and a half ago when those very trees were cut down by her. By then, the property below was already sold and plans were in progress for the restaurant. Having lived next door to this the whole time, we can state that a whole lot of dirt and refuse was removed from right below that house in order to start putting in the needed supports for the hill. We also find it very interesting that after all this time, the city finally knows what those of us on top of the hill have known for many months, which is that if it comes to that, the house can’t be moved during the rainy season. Even it if is removed or taken down, the situation still remains as the house and our property will still need to be stabilized. As they were very young when the original slide happened, both Mr. Hill and Mr. Guirado told me that they were not aware of what happened back in 1981. Mr. Hill isn't the only one who wants closure to this nasty situation. We also want closure and feel that the city administrators have been playing Russian roulette with our house and our lives.
We have two people one who bought a property below a known slide and built a restaurant and another who bought a home on top of a known slide. WHY? This landslide areas has been well known for quite some time. Why would a person make such an unwise investment?
I understand that the situation is complicated,and since it is not "city's land" the city is being ultra cautious. What I do not understand is how this has been such a drawn out issue considering that in the past this same hill slide has cost lives. What happens if the whole thing comes tumbling down on the people enjoying their dinner at what is a very nice restaurant. I have quit going to Sapphires because of this and I love the restaurant I just believe is being safe. Poor Mr. Hill has been the person affected the worse here. lets hope they find a solution before disaster stricks and he ends up being sued because someone is injured or dies from this mess.
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines