Commission to tighten rules on cougar hunting

By William McCall, Associated Press Writer
Saturday, January 12, 2008 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
PORTLAND — The rules on choosing who can use dogs to hunt cougars for the state likely will get a little tougher.

The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission tentatively approved the rules Friday as part of a cougar management plan adopted after voters banned sport hunting for cougars and bears with dogs in 1994.

The rules determine who can qualify as a volunteer agent for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

The Legislature approved a law last year allowing the department to appoint volunteers to use dogs to kill cougars or bears to help wildlife managers control their population or reduce the potential threat to people, pets and livestock.

But the 2007 law failed to provide clear authority for designating who could become agents.

The commission was set to adopt the new rules spelling out that authority in October, but the Oregon Hunters Association asked commissioners to wait until they could talk to hunters who specialize in using dogs, or hunting hounds.

Dogs are considered one of the most effective ways to track and kill the big cats, which number more than 5,000 in Oregon. The state management plan calls for holding the population at, or above, 3,000 cougars.

After listening to ODFW staff and public testimony, the commissioners on Friday tightened the rules for appointing agents, increasing the level of state supervision and excluding anybody ever convicted of a felony. The draft rules would have excluded only those convicted of felony animal or domestic abuse in the past 5 years.

“We’ve really clamped it down,” said Marla Rae, the commission chairwoman.

Al Elkins, a lobbyist for the Oregon Hunters Association, said the group supported the draft rules and the changes added Friday.

Opponents also welcomed the tougher rules but repeated their concerns that allowing hunting with dogs will lead to killing cougars that are not a threat to safety or livestock.

“We still think it’s a violation of Measure 18,” said Kelly Peterson, state director for the Oregon chapter of the Humane Society, referring to the 1994 ban on sport hunting with dogs.

“Voters said they accepted the use of those practices in individual cases,” Peterson said, “but this allows the indiscriminate killing of cougars and bears.”

According to state figures presented at the meeting, the number of cougars killed by hunters has increased steadily since 2000 — from a total of 188 that year to 305 in 2007.

Final approval was expected at the next commission meeting on Feb. 8.

———

On the Net:

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife history of cougars: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/wildlife/cougar/
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

nuff said wrote on Jan 14, 2008 10:06 AM:

Your right, why bother, since the state suffer's from new laws and regulations annualy, based upon a few county's in oregon. you shut down schools if someone see's a coyote, yet we have coyotes/cougers in our back yards, you protest logging yet go home to a log house on 5 acres that you have clear cut. lets all bow down to the portland area, because in their strength in numbers,they know whats best for the rest of us

cynic wrote on Jan 14, 2008 6:52 AM:

Another good example of why bother to vote.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections