Mexican trucks get access to U.S. roads

By Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Writer
Sunday, January 06, 2008 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration is going ahead with a controversial pilot program giving Mexican trucks greater access to U.S. highways, despite a new law by Congress against it.

The decision to proceed with the four-month-old program, which allows participating Mexican trucking companies to send loads throughout the United States, comes despite language in the recently signed catchall spending bill aimed at blocking it.

But the Department of Transportation is taking advantage of a loophole in the new law, which prohibits the government from spending any money to “establish” the program. The government says the new rules don’t apply to the current program since it started in September.

“The U.S. Department of Transportation will not establish any new demonstration programs with Mexico,” said Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration spokeswoman Melissa Mazzella DeLaney. “The current cross-border trucking demonstration project — established in September — will continue to operate in a manner that puts safety first.”

Congressional opponents of the programs insist that it’s clear what lawmakers were trying to do last year when both the House and Senate voted against allowing the program to go forward.

The provision, as signed by President Bush last month, says: “None of the funds made available under this act may be used to establish a cross-border motor carrier demonstration program to allow Mexico-domiciled motor carriers to operate beyond the commercial zones along the international border between the United States and Mexico.”

“They know what the law says,” retorted Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., who won a 74-24 vote to block the program. “And they’re not above the law.” Dorgan warned they better follow the law.

The hotly contested program, opposed by labor, independent truck owners and environmental groups, permits up to 500 trucks from 100 Mexican motor carriers full access to U.S. roads.

Opponents have been fighting the measure — part of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement — since it was first proposed, saying the program will erode highway safety and eliminate U.S. jobs. And they say that insufficient safeguards exist to make sure that Mexican trucks are as safe as U.S. carriers.

Supporters of the plan say letting more Mexican trucks on U.S. highways will save American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars. And they say U.S. trucking companies will benefit since reciprocal changes in Mexico’s rules permit U.S. trucks new access to that country.

Since 1982, Mexican trucks have had to stop within a buffer border zone and transfer their loads to U.S. trucks.

Still, there’s widespread opposition to the program within Congress. The House voted without a roll call in July to block the program and the Senate’s 3-to-1 margin in September to block it came despite administration assurances that safeguards are in place to “ensure a safe and secure program.”

The Teamsters Union, Sierra Club and Public Citizen joined together in a lawsuit filed in August seeking to block the program.

A hearing is scheduled for Feb. 12 before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, Teamsters spokeswoman Leslie Miller said.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Janice W wrote on Jan 7, 2008 8:18 AM:

For more information about Bush's plan for a North American union visit: http://www.mmlv.us/nacorridors.html

More evidence Mexican trucks coming to U.S.
US trucks and truck drivers must meet US safety standards and insurance coverage on their trucks and driving rules. Mexican trucks do NOT have to meet those same standards or insurance coverage.
Mexican trucks also do not pay road taxes that Americans must pay.
US citizens are at an extreme disadvantage here.

US citizens who have had accidents with Mexican trucks are never able to collect on insurance so their own policy costs go up.

This is how the neo-con conservatives invision America's future.

My Opinion wrote on Jan 6, 2008 9:59 PM:

I here a lot of people around the country complain about the imigration problem. Locally we have a new communications provider based out of Canada and being supported by everyone's tax dollars whether you have access to their service or not. So those tax dollars go to the folks in Canada. How did we let that slip by? The government wouldn't do that for the local phone company or cable company. Looks like the government isn't so worried about the companies that are U.S. based. Where does all the rest of their funding come from? Hitachi is one company. Certainly doesn't sound like a U.S. based company. If we want to keep our country strong then why do we allow people to manipulate our elected officials into allowing this to happen. Reminds me of the lumber industry in the late 70s and early 80's. The orders for lumber produced locally dried up because Japan poured money into building lumber plants. The Canadian government made sure what little was exported to Japan came from them. What did we get? Spotted owl trouble and no support to keep the business alive, or at least not enough. Anyone who's been here since the 70's knows somebody that was laid off in the lumber business.

Look, maybe we all felt we'd waited too long for High Speed Internet, better phone service, and so forth. Maybe we should see if we can somehow use tax dollars to bring in an Olive Garden or a Costco. Maybe if every town in the U.S. invited a foreign based company in to compete against U.S. companies and we made this attractive by throwing in a lot of tax dollars we could... put this country in a vulnerable position where we'd have to bend to the wishes of foreign countries. Think about it. Our own government won't use our tax dollars to help companies which are based in the here in the U.S., but we'll let them give our hard earned money to foreigners. How many other hypocritical decisions have been made here in the last 10 years and what other decisions will we make here that will further undermine this country and the families that live and raise their children here.

RICK wrote on Jan 6, 2008 9:23 AM:

MORE AMERICAN JOBS LOST TO CHEAP LABOR.CHEAP LABOR IS DESTROYING AMERICA.
I WONDER HOW EASY IT WOULD BE FOR A MEXICAN TRUCKER/TERRORIST TO SNEAK A DIRTY BOMB/NUCLEAR DEVICE INTO AMERICA?
RICK

Jones wrote on Jan 6, 2008 12:58 AM:

"Supporters of the plan say letting more Mexican trucks on U.S. highways will save American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars"
Read that as: We've found a new way to smuggle illegal aliens into the USA, thanks to NAFTA and el presidente Jorge Boooosh, not to mention the millions of lousy products imported from china, soon to be on your walmarts shelves.

Just An Observer wrote on Jan 5, 2008 6:23 PM:

Bush sure didn't need to invade Iraq when Mexico was right next door...LOL! Just wait until a few wrecks with Mexican trucks occur and see how well the system works for accidents. The savings to the American consumer will come at the expense of the American truck driver, who has a hard enough time with relatively low wages for the kind of job they do, which requires a variety of credentials as well as a great deal of experience to perform the job properly and safely.


All in all, a typical Bush move to ignore the wishes of Congress and the American people just as in so many other matters. We'll vote appropriately in 2008!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections