Governor appoints Griffith to OPAC

Font Size:  Default font size  Large font size 

By Susan Chambers, Staff Writer
Saturday, January 05, 2008 | 13 comment(s)

COOS BAY — The “cold war” between Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski and Coos County Commissioner John Griffith is over.

There is no clear winner. There is no clear loser.

But South Coast residents now have representation — the representation they’ve asked for repeatedly — on the Ocean Policy Advisory Council. On Friday, Kulongoski appointed Griffith to the council, effective Jan. 25, for a four-year term.

“I don’t look at this as a win and a loss,” Sen. Joanne Verger, D-Coos Bay, said from Salem on Friday. “There’s not a backing down. There’s an agreement that we need to move forward.”

The battle between Kulongoski and Griffith goes back to before Kulongoski was elected to state office, but it’s been no secret that Griffith supporters have repeatedly asked the governor that he be reinstated to the council for the south county seat.

The issue of Griffith’s reinstatement came to a head at the Nov. 30 OPAC meeting in Gold Beach, when the council was discussing moving forward on marine reserves, off-limits areas in the ocean.

Council members voted to stop the majority of public outreach plans until the South County seat issue was resolved — one way or the other. Elected and appointed officials and residents repeatedly said during the public comment session that they wanted Griffith in that seat.

The Coastal Caucus heard that message loud and clear, too. It sent at least one letter to the governor asking for Griffith’s reappointment, but it wasn’t until Verger and fellow Democrat, Rep. Arnie Roblan, also of Coos Bay, sat down with Griffith that things started to change.

qqq

It’s difficult to talk about Griffith without including the words “opinionated” or “controversial.” He has opposed marine reserves or the process by which they are being considered at OPAC in the past.

That kind of attitude was part of what started the cold war in the first place, but this is where it ends, Verger and Roblan said.

“I felt that our discussion with him, his positions — while strong — would be handled in a fair and democratic way,” Verger said.

To both Verger and Roblan, the democratic process is of utmost importance. Everyone should be at the table when it comes to making decisions or recommendations about major issues, such as marine reserves.

The two then went to Kulongoski and requested — again — that Griffith be reappointed.

“If we want any process to work, we need to have all the members,” Roblan said Friday. “It really came to an impasse.”

And Kulongoski was clear in his letter.

“I take the work of the Ocean Policy Council very seriously, and it is well-known that in the past I have been resistant to your appointment,” Kulongoski wrote. “However, I am unwilling to let that reluctance stand in the way of the important tasks before the council. Therefore, I am appointing you with faith that your service will be rendered in a fair and balanced manner.”

On Friday, Griffith said he was surprised. He said he had not yet seen a copy of the letter from Kulongoski, but said that the discussion before the holidays was good.

“We had a good chat. Open communication,” he said.

But his thoughts, too, were primarily about the process.

“I’m really glad the governor fulfilled the wishes of the south counties,” he said, noting that he had the support of the commissioners in Lane, Douglas, Coos and Curry counties.

qqq

OPAC members hadn’t seen the letter yet on Friday. They didn’t hear about Griffith’s reappointment until they began getting calls from the media.

“That is awesome!” OPAC Chairman Scott McMullen said from Astoria.

The tribal seat on OPAC was empty, too, but now has been filled by Robert Kentta, of Siletz, with the Confederated Tribes of the Siletz.

“I’m pleased that the issue has been resolved and that OPAC is now able to fully function with a full complement of members, including the South Coast,” McMullen said.

Other council members were pleased, too, and planned to move ahead with work on marine reserves and wave energy when OPAC meets in Astoria on Monday and Tuesday.

McMullen said he didn’t have any specific plans for Griffith. He will be treated as any other council member would be, he said.

Some people might wonder whether Griffith has already made up his mind with regard to marine reserves.

No, he said, noting that he worked with a shellfish biologist in the 1990s to establish the Gregory Point research area, near Bastendorff Beach.

“If the coast and the affected stakeholders want something and they decide it’s justified, then it could work out,” he said. “If they’re ignored, it can’t.”

The integrity of the OPAC process had been in question by residents in the past, due to the standoff between Kulongoski and Griffith.

Now the council can begin work in earnest.

“One person should not hold up the process,” Verger said. “I believe that all of us working in public life, whether we are appointed or elected, should have appropriate behavior in the democratic process.”
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Tina wrote on Jan 10, 2008 2:08 PM:

I believe what you are saying. We have way too many silent leaders in this county. No one is asking any questions about these projects at all. The level of corruption runs deep. It is very sad.

Thomas wrote on Jan 10, 2008 12:31 PM:

TINA, the odds are good that Griffith actually had a hand in recruiting the LNG terminal here in the first place. Mysterious unnameable entities interested in the North Spit have been obliquely mentioned by him and Nikki for years now, and this is undoubtably one of those. Wonder when they'll admit to us that the proposed container ship terminal is tied to Yucca Mountain?

Tina wrote on Jan 8, 2008 12:51 PM:

Mr. Griffith represents corporations and big money and he has shown his blatant disregard for the people of Coos County by ignoring the decision of the commission's own hired hearing officer regarding the land use issues in the siting of the LNG terminal on the North Spit. He refused to allow an advisory vote on LNG saying that the County had no say in the siting of the terminal. This was an outright lie. He knew the land use issue would come before the commisioners. The only way to end this shameful and unfortunate situation is to vote him out of office as soon as possible.

Thomas wrote on Jan 8, 2008 11:57 AM:

to JUST AN OBSERVER: Unfortunately for your position, Grittith's close ties with the so-called 'Wise Use Movement' and Pacific Legal Foundation has resulted in his strong support for laws and legal actions that have taken away much of the public's ability to have a say in how natural resources are utilized. He is the type of ideologist who stands logic and the scientific method on their heads, by cherry-picking evidence to support positions he's already decided beforehand are true, and disregarding anything to the contrary. Many people's experience dealing with him as someone who is totally immune to accepting any imformation which conflicts with what he wants to believe.

Just An Observer wrote on Jan 7, 2008 9:12 PM:

Mr. Griffith received support from locally elected port commissions, county commissions, citizens who have shown up at various hearings and the OPAC board, who finally grew tired of the governor's intransigence in regards to appointing Griffith.


Since these elected officials are supported by the majority of people here, which is how they got elected (LOL!), since the citizen input was pro-Griffith and since the OPAC board itself wanted Griffith, it's apparent to me that Griffith got the needed public support and is not a megacorp shill. What he does stand for so far as I can see is that we need to use our resources WISELY as opposed to locking them up as the radical environmentalist contigent would have us do. Thankfully that contingent is a minority, albeit a noisy one as well as a litigous one. Coos Bay and the South Coast make money when the resources are PROPERLY harvested, whether that be fish, logs or natural gas. We the majority have a vested interest in maintaining our economy and that maintenance means not over-reaching the limits of those resources as well as not under-utilizing them either plus not making a mess when we do use them since we do enjoy a nice place to live as well as the ability to make a living here.


If someone does get out of hand and do things in violation of the various environmental laws, then the environmentalists will act to reign in the abusers as that is what they do at their best. At their worst they act as obstructionists. When I see them acting well as protective stewards of the natural resources, then I'll give support their way when the issue at hand demands such. When we have a voice from the other side like Griffith, who seems to promote good utilization practices, I'll support him as well when what he says makes sense for actually attaining the goal of sustainable harvesting/usage of our natural bounty.


By the way, I am NOT the Coos Bay Kid JK, I am Just An Observer...LOL!

Thomas wrote on Jan 7, 2008 5:03 PM:

TINA & RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT: Did you know that Griffith signed Coos County on to 2 other important land-use law suits before the Snowy Plover one, and did so without providing the legally required public notice beforehand? Most people here know nothing about these, since they weren't reported in any local news, but they also have a national effect. GOOGLE up National Association of Home Builders v. Evans, and American Forest and Paper Association v. Veneman sometime. Apparently Griffith's respect for following the rules is a tad bit conditional, depending mostly upon how he feels about an issue.

Tina wrote on Jan 7, 2008 1:46 PM:

So far I haven't seen Mr. Griffith defending the economies of the South Coast by demanding an economic analysis for LNG in the Bay Area. Mr. Griffith has a record of anti-environment decisions and representation and it is apparent he represents the interests of big business and corporations. The county's lawsuit against the Department of the Interior states, "State and federal government have intentionally excluded the public from having any input in beach management for the snowy plover." and "the Fish and Wildlife Service must analyze the economic and other relevant impacts of including specific areas in Critical Habitat Designations, and that those analyses be done before designating specific areas as critical habitat. We believe the service did not do a legally sufficient job of this analysis." Why does he not demand the same from Jordan Cove Energy Project and the FERC? Hypocrisy!



Responsible Management wrote on Jan 7, 2008 11:50 AM:

So, JK, are your grandkids going to drive up into the old growth in their SUV, on a logging road...and then what? Currently, the BLM and Forest Service are producing NO real revenue to support your grandkids' schools. Maybe if that changes, your GK's will be able to read NFMA (That's the National Forest Management Act) and understand what "multiple-use sustained yield" means.
Griffith will defend the economies of the south coast against the ill-advised feel-good policies that are destroying US (you, me and all south coast citizens). He will make sure the rules are followed, as he has in the past. Kulongoskitzhaber wants the reserves, without any real economic analysis of their impacts. Is his environmental legacy more important than the economies of the south coast?

JK wrote on Jan 6, 2008 10:36 AM:

Whoa I hope that its not true that Griffith represents the "majority" point of view on the South Coast as claimed by the Coos Bay Kid. Griffith's approach represents a neanderthal mentality to resource management. Here's a guy who in stating his support for the current pending BLM plan to divest my grandchildren of any hope to experience an old growth forest environment stated "It is the dominant purpose of the lands to provide a continuous flow of timber". Griffith views the natural world as his slave, existing to serve his manifest purpose. Just got off the wagon train. This guy Griffith needs to be watched closely.

polit-icks wrote on Jan 5, 2008 9:46 PM:

Let's see If Mr. Griffith can be fair and set aside his own personal beliefs and agenda and give us all fair representation. The South Coast is more than just ATVers and BlueRibbon coalition members, and more than just tree- and birdhuggers. I dare say that there may even be some treehuggers that ride ATVs. We in Coos County need to be fairly represented and I will be happily surprised if John Griffith can put the needs of the entire county ahead of a few- on either end of the political spectrum.

my observation wrote on Jan 5, 2008 7:29 PM:

Hot air is a negative force?

Thomas wrote on Jan 5, 2008 4:03 PM:

Just out of curiosity JUST AN OBSERVER, has there ever been a vote or poll taken locally on any OPAC issue, so that someone could say with your kind of confidence that Griffith actually does represent what most of us hereabouts really want? It would be nice if he would clarify for us why 'stakeholders' either can or can't be 'ignored' by him at different times?

Just An Observer wrote on Jan 5, 2008 12:27 PM:

Outside of all the political spin, it's about time Kulongoski quit his feud with Griffith. Having someone on OPAC who isn't Kulongoski's yes man in regards to the marine reserves and who represents a majority point of view for the South Coast was important.


I find it interesting that Verger takes an oblique slap at Grffith for "strong positions". Does not Mrs. Verger also have "strong positions"? If she doesn't, then what does she stand for? If she does, why does she make this remark, which comes across as a catty criticism of an opposing point of view? The answer to either question is not favorable for Mrs. Verger.


Once again I hope I do not disappoint Just Me, Coos Bay Kid and others who see me as a negative force. Got to keep the fans happy after all...LOL! However where negative events happen and let's face it, newspapers don't sell with happy news ("If it bleeds it leads!") and thus the news stories are going to be those dealing with problems and negative events. If you can't deal with my take, DON'T READ IT!


Simple enough, eh?

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | Blog The World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace



Special Sections

More Special Sections
Click here for your local weather!