State nixes Powers council recall effort

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 02, 2008 | No comments posted.

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
A pair of technicalities has thwarted an effort to recall the mayor of Powers and three city councilors.

In August, Beverly Elliott and Marjorie Kalb, both of Powers, filed recall applications targeting Mayor Barbara Cottom and councilors Bob Leckband, Larry Northup and Pete Cunningham. By state law, they had until Dec. 10 to collect and submit signatures from 15 percent of Powers’ registered voters to set up an election.

But a lack of familiarity with the state’s requirements for filing and returning a petition led to the confiscation of collected signatures.

The women obtained permission to collect signatures Aug. 30. More than two months later, on Nov. 9, they arrived at Powers City Hall with sheets containing the requisite number of signatures, 53 per elected official. But there were two problems.

First, according to the Secretary of State’s Recall Manual, only the chief petitioner is allowed to submit the signatures. Elliott was assigned this role in paperwork filed with the city, but it was Kalb who handed over the papers.

Second, the sheets of signatures must be numbered sequentially for the state to consider them valid. But Charlotte Pancheau, Power’s city recorder, said the sheets were not.

Pancheau took the four petitions to the Coos County Courthouse, where she was told to contact the Secretary of State’s Office. It was a state representative who instructed Pancheau to disqualify the petition because of the two discrepancies.

“If they accepted the petition, the city would have been violating the law,” said Summer Davis, a compliance specialist in the Secretary of State’s Election Division.

Pancheau said Elliott did not submit any new petitions before the Dec. 10 deadline. As a result, anyone wishing to recall the four targeted public officials will need to apply for a new petition.

Attempts to contact Elliott and Kalb were unsuccessful, but an unsigned letter delivered to The World suggests the recall effort will continue.

“The Powers Recall Committee is still going forward in our Recall efforts,” it said. “We will continue trying to get a petition passed through in the Powers City Hall. As for getting signatures there has been No problem in that effort.”

The disqualified petitions were not returned to the petitioners and remain at City Hall. Pancheau said at least 57 signatures were collected for each recall petition, though the signers’ names were not verified with the county’s voter registration records. The petition to recall Leckband generated 62 signatures, Cunningham’s produced 61, and Northup’s and Cottom’s both included 57.

The city received reports contending erroneous information was used to convince voters to sign the petition, which Pancheau referred to the Secretary of State’s Office.

Norma Buckno, a compliance specialist in the Election Division, said there was insufficient evidence to suggest any election law was violated.

“However, should another recall petition be filed, all parties are advised to use caution and conscientiously follow all election laws,” she wrote in a letter to Pancheau.

In August, Kalb said she filed the recall applications because the council mishandled personnel issues and failed to secure grant funding. The mayor and three councilors were in the majority that declared the city recorder’s position vacant in July and then cut the assistant city recorder position in August.

Cottom said she would not be surprised if another recall effort occurs, but said she will not change her governing approach.

“I believe the council and myself are doing the best we can, but you can’t make everyone happy” she said. “I think the city is pushing forward.”

———

Staff Writer Alexander Rich covers Powers issues for The World. He can be reached by calling 269-1222, ext. 271; or by e-mailing to arich@theworldlink.com.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

No comments posted.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections