County should review open records rules


Saturday, December 15, 2007 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
The Coos County commissioners blundered badly Wednesday in making their decision in a phase of the hotly debated proposal to site a liquefied natural gas facility on the North Spit.

But what is likely to get John Griffith, Nikki Whitty and Kevin Stufflebean in hot water is not what they decided, but the ham-fisted way they did it.

The three met briefly — before a crowd so large the meeting had to be moved to a bigger room — to finalize the 15 conditions prepared by county staff for the approval of a land-use application.

Zip.

Zip.

Zip.

In under 10 minutes, the three agreed to formally vote on the conditions at their next meeting — and then they were gone, leaving in their wake, dozens of Coos County citizens scratching their heads in confusion.

Many of those at the meeting naturally wondered what the commissioners had just done — and were curious about those conditions. But their requests for copies of the conditions were rebuffed by county staff.

Wrong.

Wrong.

Wrong.

The conditions were clearly public record and should have been made available to that public.

None of the commissioners disagreed. All three said after the meeting that the material should have been provided to the citizens who requested it.

That’s reassuring, but it isn’t enough.

When it comes to meeting public information mandates, the buck stops with Griffith, Whitty and Stufflebean. It is up to them to make sure those responsible for providing that information are apprised of their obligation.

This isn’t the first time Coos County citizens have been kept in the dark by the Board of Commissioners.

But it should be the last.
Tags »

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

C arol wrote on Dec 17, 2007 10:27 AM:

Usually people don't let other people see something (that they are involved in) because they have done something wrong. I think that possibility should be considered here. What else, for example, have these county commissioners hidden from public view? Maybe an investigation should be started on why these people are voting the way they are against practically every learned opinion that has been vetted.

Thomas wrote on Dec 16, 2007 7:56 AM:

Griffith and Whitty have indeed repeatedly violated Oregon's public meeting statutes over their years in office, yet other than an occassional editorial bemoaning their behavior, nothing of real consequence is ever done about it. I believe this is largely due to a poor media coverage of our County Commission, the general ignorance by voters about their function in government, and the lack of an effective oversight agency in Oregon anymore. A safe bet is that they will get away with this latest abuse too, and it appears Stufflebean has realized it is politically safe to follow their lead.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections