Carissa work could curb public access

By Damian Boudreau, Staff Writer
Saturday, December 08, 2007 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
When the New Carissa ran aground in the surf near Coos Bay’s North Spit about eight years ago, it quickly became a destination for tourists, a concern for environmentalists and a headache for state officials.

Now, a request by the ship’s salvager to close public access on part of the spit is drawing criticism and scorn from some local residents and county officials.

The project

The New Carissa ran aground on Feb. 4, 1999, while waiting to enter Coos Bay. The ship broke apart, spilling an estimated 70,000 to 140,000 gallons of fuel oil into the surrounding waters. While the bow was being towed out to sea, a towline broke, causing the bow to drift north and run aground at Waldport, before finally being towed to sea and sunk. The stern remains near Horsfall Beach.

Titan Maritime is scheduled to begin dismantling the wreck sometime in March. The project is expected to take eight weather-working months and cost the state about $16 million, according to records from the Oregon Department of State Lands.

The plan from Titan involves the use of two barges that would be placed near the wreck. The barges would be used by crews removing portions of the ship. A staging area would encompass about a quarter-acre onshore, approximately 1,000 feet from the New Carissa, near the dune line. There would be a 40-foot-tall tower, which would include cables for an aerial transport to take crews to and from the wreckage site. In addition, the company could include one or two 20-foot containers to be used as offices, several 20-foot storage containers, a parking area and heavy machinery including cranes, bulldozers and excavators, according to documents from HDR Engineering Inc. and State Lands. Both the barges and the staging area would be manned 24 hours a day for the length of the project.

Closure

Titan wants to close several roads for the duration of the project, said Linda Petterson, realty specialist for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Coos Bay District. The closures, to set up the staging area and provide emergency access or escape routes for crews working on the project, would restrict public access on South Dike Road and Foredune Road.

In addition, the company wants a 100-yard buffer surrounding the staging area, restricting all public access, said Carol Snead, senior environmental project manager at HDR Engineering, an Omaha, Neb.-based engineering and consulting firm. The North Spit Road, which runs along the bay side of the spit, would remain open, Snead said.

Titan is required to prepare an environmental assessment of potential impacts of the closure and staging area on BLM lands. HDR is handling the environmental assessment, which involves reviewing the proposed project and the effect the plan could have on plants, animals and water surrounding the area. The company took public comments through Friday. When a draft EA is released, another two-week period will follow for public comment before a final report is issued.

Then, BLM will make a decision whether to close the roads to public access. Options could include denying the request, granting only a part-time closure, or restricting public access completely, said Megan Harper, BLM public affairs specialist.

Officials at the Oregon Department of State Lands contend the roads should be closed to all traffic.

“The reason that road (would) be closed is because of public safety,” said Julie Curtis, communication manager at the Department of State Lands. Danger to the public could come from machinery at the site, including the aerial tramway. The state is working with BLM to work out details.

But the BLM would have the final say about the road closures, she added.

Local reaction

Titan’s plan to close the roads around the area doesn’t make much sense to Coos Bay resident Donna Bishop.

“I personally don’t see any reason for the closure,” she said, “but I can see (why) they wouldn’t want anybody in their way.”

Bishop is the chairwoman of the South Coast Chapter of Oregon Equestrian Trails, a nonprofit group responsible for setting up and maintaining riding trails in the area. The group recently completed work on a system of trails on the North Spit. One trailhead is located about a half-mile down the South Dike Road.

According to a letter from HDR sent to about 150 residents and several agencies in the area, “the need to close these roads to non-project vehicles is based on the need to maintain emergency access” and an evacuation route for workers. The company did not specify what kind of events would constitute an emergency.

Bishop is unconvinced.

“The only way an ambulance is going to get out there is if it has four-wheel drive,” she said.

Coos County Commissioner John Griffith doesn’t like Titan’s plan to close portions of Foredune Road, either.

Residents of Coos County were not compensated for the nearly eight months time they couldn’t use the beaches on the North Spit after the shipwreck, Griffith said — and they should have been.  

“The state of Oregon, for whom Titan Maritime will be contracting, never attempted to make the citizens of Coos County whole, especially those who lost access to the North Spit, and for other local government costs incurred during the New Carissa debacle,” he stated in a letter to HDR.

Griffith said the state often moves without considering the impact on local residents.

“I don’t think a majority of our people are going to be OK with it,” he said.

Griffith suggested the company widen the Foredune Road and keep a tow truck at the staging area in case the company needs to remove a vehicle from the road, leaving public access open. The other option: Just drive around the disabled vehicle.

Griffith contends the county has leverage in the debate of whether to close the roadways. The salvage company must use a county-owned road, the TransPacific Parkway, to go to and from the staging area. He said it’s possible the county could close the road for safety, allowing access to local residents by permit only. Those working for the company would not receive permits.  

“They want to talk about safety; well, we can, too,” he said. “I don’t think we’re going to hurt them. They’re (more likely) going to hurt us.”

Griffith also has concerns about nearby snowy plover habitat, which lies on the beach just south of the New Carissa. In his letter to HDR, he stated he intends “to make sure managing agencies hold Titan Maritime to the same rigid standards they hold the recreating public regarding snowy plover management.”

State officials are aware of the balance between the project, habitat and curious residents interested in watching the salvage, Curtis said.

“Snowy plover habitat adds another layer of challenge,” she added.

Bishop is worried about what effect the road closures would have on other North Spit users. A number of hikers, tourists and birdwatchers visit the area, especially during the summer months, Bishop said.

For Griffith, the closure of the road would mean that surfers and surf fisherman would have to walk with their equipment miles to the beaches.

Most of the salvage work would happen between March and November, depending on the weather. Bishop doubted Titan could accomplish the work in that time, given the ever-changing conditions in the area. She speculated the entire cleanup could take years.

Representatives from Titan Maritime declined to be interviewed for this story, referring all questions through the company’s client, the Oregon Department of State Lands.
Tags »
How company plans to dismantle wreck




The removal of the New Carissa is expected to take about eight weather-working months. As part of preparing for removal work, Titan Maritime, the company handling the dismantling, prepared and submitted a Removal-Fill Permit application to the Oregon Department of State Lands. The following are excerpts taken from the permit.


n The proposed work will be completed using temporary structures in the tidal zone near the wreckage and on shore approximately 1,000 feet east of the wreckage. Two jackup barges will flank the wreckage and serve as work platforms during the dismantling process. A shoreline staging area will be composed of an aerial construction transporter, two office containers, several storage containers, a crane, a parking area, and an access road. The two jackup barges [named Karlissa A (KA) and Karlissa B (KB),] each 170 feet x 80 feet x 13 feet, will be floated near the wreck.


n One jackup barge will be winched into place by a bulldozer on the beach and the other will be positioned from the stationary barge. A helicopter will be used to transfer mooring lines from the barge to the bulldozer. Once winched into place, each barge will be jacked up on six legs so that the deck is at the same elevation as the wreckage, with a 20-to-30-foot gap between the water surface and the barge deck. The legs are 71 inches in diameter and will likely be sunk approximately 30 feet into the sand. The legs are designed to use high pressure water spray from the end of the legs to agitate the sand and sink the legs under their own weight. Impact or vibratory pile driving may be used to place legs if this method does not work effectively. The jacking process does not use any lubricants that contain oils, grease, and/or other hydrocarbons.


n The shoreline staging area will occupy an area of approximately 25,900 square feet located above the average high tide line, near the dune line. The purpose of this staging area is to provide onshore support for the in-water barges and the location for the construction transporter system. The construction transporter is an aerial tramway that will connect the shoreline staging area to the seaward work platform (KA), providing safe and efficient transport of crew and materials. It will be composed of two towers within the staging area, two cable cars, and a heavy wire cable connecting to the KA. Erection of the construction transporter support structures will require the use of an excavator and crane to bury two deadman anchors approximately 250 feet to the east and to raise the towers. Approximately 40 cubic yards of sand will be excavated to place the deadman anchors. The crane and excavator used to construct the construction transporter will remain within the staging area until the removal of the wreckage is complete, and will then be used to dismantle the structures.

n The New Carissa stern section will be dismantled in situ using exothermic steel cutting techniques. Fragments of the wreckage will be hoisted by barge-mounted crane and placed on a barge. The submerged portion of the stern section will be removed using up to ten 300-ton hydraulic pullers.
Wreckage scrap materials will be barged to an appropriate recycling and disposal facility. No scrap material will be transferred to the staging area. Any contaminants remaining on or leaving the New Carissa are the responsibility of the DSL. Similarly, any contaminants on the jackup barges are the responsibly of Titan. In response to the possibility of oil or other contaminants entering the water, DSL and Titan have developed a joint Pollution Response Plan (PRP) to address the management of any contaminants as well as the removal process and contaminant cleanup.


n The schedule of the New Carissa Wreck Removal is dependent upon mobilization of the jackup barges. The jackup barges must be transported from their home port in Florida through the Panama Canal to the wreckage site. Once on site, the barges must be placed into position during periods of calm weather. A summer work period was chosen because of the work window of typically calm seas. The proposed in-water and onshore work is scheduled to take approximately three months to complete. The staging area will be constructed prior to the arrival and positioning of the barges.


n Activities within the Pacific Ocean are regulated by DSL and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). No permanent impacts to waters of the state or U.S. (including wetlands) are proposed. Temporary removal (12,839 cubic yards; 0.25 acres) and fill (3,413 cubic yards; 0.25 acres) within the Pacific Ocean will total 16,252 cubic yards (0.50 acres). No temporary impacts to wetlands or other freshwater systems will occur.


n Temporary fill/removal associated with the jackup barges (528 cubic yards, 0.01 acres of removal; 528 cubic yards, 0.01 acres of fill) will be limited to the installation and removal of the 12 legs (6 legs per barge) needed to support and stabilize the barges during wreck removal operations. Approximately 25 percent of the New Carissa is buried below the sea floor and will result in 9,426 cubic yards (0.24 acres) of temporary removal of the ship structure. In addition, sand located within the hull of the New Carissa will be temporarily displaced (removed and discharged) during salvage operations resulting in 2,885 cubic yards (0.24 acres) of temporary removal and 2,885 cubic yards (0.24 acres) of temporary fill (discharge).
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Grant,NORTH BAY,Coos BAY .USA wrote on Mar 25, 2008 12:29 PM:

TiTan maritime is a good co, give them a chance to do there job, a lot of that 16mil, is going to be spent in Coos Bay. think about it.

Gene wrote on Dec 11, 2007 3:55 PM:

I made a comment about this article and it was censored. Why? It was not derogatory or slanderous. Is this the way the The World operates? What happened to free speech and why is it that it was them getting cessored it would be wrong? Free speech should be protected. And, don't say it was lost, the caption said it was received and would be posted as soon as it was reviewed. This isn't the first comment to be rejected. If anything is mentioned concerning our local officials than it most likly will be cut. If it keeps up I will comment in another forum.

Richie in East Bay wrote on Dec 9, 2007 10:39 AM:

....or they could just dig a hole and bury it like everyone else does in Coos County...

J. Zimmermann wrote on Dec 8, 2007 11:00 PM:

This whole mess has been screwed up from the get-go. By setting the ship on fire to burn up the fuel, they created a whole nother problem by weakening the ships sides through the intence heat from the fire. I feel that if they had tryied to move the ship before it became so mired in the sand, they could have had a fighting chance of moving it. Even by pumping out the fuel, even if they had to cut a hole in side, it could have cut well up above the water line. But it seems that the powers to be had no idea what they were doing, and they still don't. But lay it on the dumb people that pay their wages through taxes, and let the College Kids take over. Sometimes logic has proven more feasable than brainiacs.

Laura wrote on Dec 8, 2007 4:34 PM:

$16 Million to clean up the Carissa? I think that money could be better spent on other things in the state. Where are the environmentalists now? I am sure since it ran aground and now that there are all sorts of sea life living in and around the wreck. If I had a voice in this, I would say just to leave it be and spend the money on schools or something worth while.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections