Housing for drug offenders proposed for downtown NB

By Jessica Musicar, Staff Writer
Friday, November 30, 2007 | 24 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
NORTH BEND — A local prison official wants to turn a building in downtown North Bend into transitional housing for substance abusers from the community, as well as offenders released from county and state prisons.

Owned by the Oregon Department of Corrections since 1972, the building has housed a work-release program, a minimum-security facility and, most recently, an alternative incarceration program, said Tim Causey, the superintendent of Shutter Creek Correctional Institution in Hauser.  Causey said he would like to see the structure — now vacant except for outreach meetings — transformed into transitional housing that would be leased and operated by Bay Area First Step, a drug- and alcohol-free housing provider in Coos Bay. Located at 1942 Sheridan Ave., the building was vacated in March after a dorm was added to Shutter Creek.

“What we are wanting to do is really look at what the Department of Corrections’ mission is. That is to provide public safety,” Causey said, adding a transitional facility would help former inmates and people down on their luck to return to society as productive citizens. “Part of that requires stable housing — a drug- and alcohol-free living environment — that’s what we’ve identified the local community has a need for.”

Causey said he began discussing the idea with city staff and officials of Bay Area First Step earlier this year, adding he wanted Bay Area First Step involved because the two entities already have an established relationship. He said he hoped the building will be transformed by July 2008.

Steve Sanden, the director of Bay Area First Step, which provides transitional housing to people recovering from substance abuse issues, said the ODC’s facility in downtown North Bend would be a good addition to his program. The nonprofit operates several housing facilities near Southwestern Oregon Community College, including a transitional house with 16 beds and eight two-bedroom apartments.

“We have an extremely long waiting list of folks who are waiting for our services. We could help a lot more people than we are currently serving,” Sanden said. Approximately 40 people are on the waiting list, he said, and the ODC site could serve about 24 of them.

Although negotiations for the facility are in the early stages, Sanden said the site would likely include shared bedrooms, a kitchen and dining area, on-site staff and case management for all clients.

“We work with a lot of folks that are ready to get their lives back together and we’ve seen a lot of success. And these people are in our community and many of them are doing quite well,” Sanden said.

The topic was raised at the North Bend City Council work session on Monday, when Causey presented it to the council.

It didn’t get the warmest reception.

While most of  the councilors had little to say about the proposal, Councilor Howard Graham said the city has been attempting to revitalize its downtown area and found transitional housing to be a poor fit for that vision.

“This is just not a use I’d like to see,” Graham said.

On Wednesday, Graham added he’d like to see how the Downtown Business Association feels about the idea.

“To have a release center basically downtown in the business center is just not a good use of the property or a wise use of the property,” Graham said, adding he may feel differently in the future.

Causey said he understands the councilor’s concerns but believed the transitional house could still be a positive addition to the area.

“I think we can be good neighbors and we have been good neighbors for 20 years. We would certainly be open to hearing what their concerns are so we can address those,” Causey said, adding that the facility could help cut down crime and help ex-convicts to become stable members of society. “I think the impact is going to be a positive impact. We ran a prison down there for a very long time with very few issues, very few complaints and most of the local community not even being aware that we were there.”

Causey said a lease agreement needs to be worked out with Bay Area First Step and he would like to continue to gather feedback from the community and city. He added the agreement would need to be approved by Max Williams, the director of the ODC, in Salem.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

J. Allen wrote on Dec 29, 2007 11:30 AM:

As I understand it the location has been used for similar purposes for over 30 years with little problems and very few people in the community aware of its use. The location of the building seems like a logical place, close to the employment department, human services department, alcohol and drug treatment, and other services these individuals would need. While this is not something most of us want to think about and certainly not something we want next to our homes or in our neighborhoods this location keeps it away from schools, children, and neighborhoods where I would think more people would have concerns with. This is something the community needs to help combat the drug problems. We can't just ship these people elsewhere we need to be responsible for the issues that face us as a community. Do you think other communities want our problems, do you want someone elses problems here? This will offer a stable and structured environment for those ready to help themselves. This is for people in our community who might otherwise be neglecting their children and families, creating havoc in our community, possibly living on our streets, and otherwise being a nuisance to the rest of us. Someone in response to the last article had concerns about bars and other businesses that served alcohol in the area being a temptation, I would think that was taken into consideration and proper steps would be taken to keep this in check. Bay Area First Step has several years under their belt and have a good track record in the community. They are a non-profit organization so our tax dollars are not being used to fund this. While I would like to see something more business-like in downtown and believe this problem didn't exist or would go away on its own the unfortunate reality is we have a problem that needs attention, here is a reasonible solution in a logical location. I hope people will open their eyes and see the opportunity before them to better our community.

J. Allen wrote on Dec 29, 2007 11:29 AM:

As I understand it the location has been used for similar purposes for over 30 years with little problems and very few people in the community aware of its use. The location of the building seems like a logical place, close to the employment department, human services department, alcohol and drug treatment, and other services these individuals would need. While this is not something most of us want to think about and certainly not something we want next to our homes or in our neighborhoods this location keeps it away from schools, children, and neighborhoods where I would think more people would have concerns with. This is something the community needs to help combat the drug problems. We can't just ship these people elsewhere we need to be responsible for the issues that face us as a community. Do you think other communities want our problems, do you want someone elses problems here? This will offer a stable and structured environment for those ready to help themselves. This is for people in our community who might otherwise be neglecting their children and families, creating havoc in our community, possibly living on our streets, and otherwise being a nuisance to the rest of us. Someone in response to the last article had concerns about bars and other businesses that served alcohol in the area being a temptation, I would think that was taken into consideration and proper steps would be taken to keep this in check. Bay Area First Step has several years under their belt and have a good track record in the community. They are a non-profit organization so our tax dollars are not being used to fund this. While I would like to see something more business-like in downtown and believe this problem didn't exist or would go away on its own the unfortunate reality is we have a problem that needs attention, here is a reasonible solution in a logical location. I hope people will open their eyes and see the opportunity before them to better our community.

Jim wrote on Dec 29, 2007 6:01 AM:

HEAR HEAR THERESA>>>BRAVO! I LIKE the idea of drug testing to receive public benefits. A little personal accountability would go a LONG way with a lot of these welchers!

Linda wrote on Dec 28, 2007 2:59 PM:

To Bill, well the world didn't seem to want to post my reply message to you. Nothing bad,just correct. I didn't say you were the person, I said you sound like him. Big difference. And home is great, as a matter of fact it was home that got him clean. Not the county or the adult parole agency. But we know what goes on there. Or do you read the paper?

Theresa wrote on Dec 28, 2007 9:35 AM:

I say lets stop drug abuse in our county PERIOD. Lets drug test before unemployment,dissability, child support checks are issued. Considering the fact that its our tax dollars thats paying for these habits, lets start drug testing before bennifits are paid out....

bill wrote on Dec 27, 2007 5:48 PM:

in respose to linda no I had nothing to do with your sons habit it sounds more like a bad home life If I had my choice all drug dealers and users would spend life in jail I would rather pay their room and board than paying for their habits

Jason wrote on Dec 27, 2007 12:32 PM:

To ODOT. About as stupid as 5 of your workers watching one work and the tax payers paying for it. Do you think it's that stupid?

Linda wrote on Dec 26, 2007 3:11 PM:

I say we put Bill on the island too. He sounds like the adult that helped my son become an addict.

bill wrote on Dec 26, 2007 12:32 PM:

I say let's fence of the island out from the mill with chain link and barb wire and put them out there for a while with nothing but what it on their backs and see if they can survive that with nothing to steal and sell for their habit.

grant freeman wrote on Dec 18, 2007 12:00 PM:

I work in the field basically as a social worker and from my experience the best way for drug users to beat the addition is to remove themselves from the element, to stay away from those who are using. In this small community we need A PROGRAM LIKE THIS SO THAT THE AFFLICTED CAN ISOLATE THEMSELVES LONG ENOUGHT TO GET CLEAN AND DISCOVER A DIFFERENT WAY OF LIVING. tHOSE OPPOSED TO HAVING THIS PROGRAM IN THEIR neighborhood are just sticking their heads in the sand..seems to reflect the state of the Union...

Sandra wrote on Dec 16, 2007 4:18 PM:

It seems pretty apparent to me that unless the communities are willing to offer a helping hand to drug and alcohol abusers they will continue to cause havoc and problems. I'll admit that unless you can escape and want a better life, it isn't going to matter. If however you are stuck in that dead end lifestyle having an alternative to turn to would be a blessing. Everyone who uses meth isn't necessarily a bad person. I think you might be surprised to find out how many socially functioning addicts there really are in the area. I know cause my husband and I were. Thank god we were able to leave there and start a new life somewhere else. If you want to help your community, don't turn your back on the down trodden, lend a hand instead.

Kat wrote on Dec 13, 2007 10:17 AM:

I am glad I left the Coos Bay/North Bend area several years ago. There needs to be many more places where people recovering from substance abuse can go to get help in the Coos Bay area. It doesn't make any difference where the treatment centers are located. I believe illegal drugs are present on most streets in the Coos Bay area. The Coos Bay area has few decent paying jobs, but lots of gambling, drugs & booze. I do go back quite often as I still have family in the area & I can walk into the casino & tell which people sitting at the slot machines are local or tourists. The locals will have the desperate look, smoking one cigarette after another, over or under weight & a few missing teeth from all the meth. It seems like the more low paying jobs in an area the more illegal drugs are used. The Coos Bay area is one of the few areas on the coast of Oregon that few tourists have as a destination other than to gamble. What is sad is it could be a great place to vacation. Although I have noticed that the Lakeside area seems to be coming a very desirable place to live & vacation. The bottom line is that the Coos Bay area needs to be supporting many more people like Causey.

ODOT wrote on Dec 10, 2007 11:06 PM:

It's a stupid idea

Tim wrote on Dec 5, 2007 2:16 PM:

MOST of you people make me sick. Thinking of yourselves and ignorantly assuming that there aren't ALREADY addicts and criminals in that area. I'm sure the people staying in this transitional house will be closely watched. It's not like they'll be dealing drugs out of it or wandering around drunk, terrorizing the neighborhood. These are people that WANT help and are at least TRYING to get it. Granted, statistics DO show that the majority of addicts relapse, but not ALL of them. To call rehab and treatment centers a "waste of money" is selfish and cruel. If they help even ONE person, then nothing has been wasted. At this point, VERY LITTLE is being done about the severe drug problem in our area. Most of the community would prefer to remain ignorant about it rather than DO anything to help. I FULLY support Causey and hope that many others follow in his footsteps. Those of you who refuse to support such a worthy cause are more of a burden to our community than the addicts who are seeking help.

sick of the NIMBY attitude wrote on Dec 5, 2007 1:05 PM:

I think it is a great idea. I just saw the brilliant documentary "Finding Normal" about Center City Concern in Portland. FYI their multiple housing projects are all in downtown areas as far as I know, and they do great work. Helping people stay clean is hard work, however success is not impossible. I believe the film said some of their programs have a success rate over 70% which is fantastic. I applaud the idea of expanding such a badly needed resource in the community. I also strongly recommend "finding normal" to everyone. And for everyone who thinks that this is a waste or a bad use of a downtown building, it sounds like the building has sat mostly empty save some meetings for a long time. How is a well used building worse then one that sits empty most of the time? Cheers to those innovative to try to solve problems.

JIm wrote on Dec 4, 2007 4:47 AM:

Chris...you have just summarized the heart of the problem...where you say "It is small minded thinking like Ricks which helps to keep people in their addiction." Where is the responsibility of the individual to solve their problems? Every time I turn around, when there is a problem, there is always someone willing to blame someone else for the problem rather than the person that IS the problem. Chris, unless individuals start taking charge of their own lives, and as long as we seek to blame OTHERS for individual failures...these failures will continue.

GREY GHOST wrote on Dec 3, 2007 4:47 PM:

Dont do it that would be stupid cause,any body that use will not stop using until they are ready.Its just a waste of time and money i know from experiance I used for 7-10 years and would not stop until i wanted to stop.All the peaple that tryed to help me i just used them and stole from them .THATS ALL THEY WILL DO

Junet wrote on Dec 3, 2007 3:42 PM:

If they wouldn't start that crap in the first place, then they wouldn't become a burden to the rest of us. Treatment.....aaaahhhh......what a waste. Most don't succeed anyway. Why waste resources?

Rick James wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:53 AM:

I agree that addiction is a huge problem in this area and I think it is great that these people are getting a chance at rehabilitation, but I don't agree that it is a good idea to house convicted criminals in the heart of downtown. And don't try to tell me they aren't criminals. Drug abuse is illegal and usually leads to other crimes to support their habits plus this operation is being run by the prison.

Chris wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:39 AM:

It is small minded thinking like Ricks which helps to keep people in their addiction. There are folks out there who are reaching out, but they do get discouraged when they keep getting told, we don't want any problem's here, take YOUR problem elsewhere. Addiction in this community is EVERYONE's problem.

Rick James wrote on Nov 30, 2007 5:24 PM:

Yeah Jason, I do have a better idea. In the article it mentioned they built dorms out at Shutters Creek. That seems like a good place for them to me, so when they decide they need a fix or a drink they have to go a little further than next door to get it. I am all for them getting treatment. I just believe there is a better location for it. Remember addiction and crime usually follow each other and I am sure some of these people have criminal histories. Do you really think it is a good idea for them to be living in a heavily populated area in the event of a relapse? And the statistics show the majority will relapse. Just my opinion though. I have mine, you have yours.

Jason wrote on Nov 30, 2007 4:21 PM:

So Rick, you have any better ideas! With people like you and Councilor Graham people would never get any help.Do you have any family members needing help that can't get it? Or are you the kind that just turn your back? This area is one of the worst for meth addiction. At least we have someone now that is trying to help. I support Causey.

Linda wrote on Nov 30, 2007 2:59 PM:

Causey has 110% od my support. It's not open yet!

Rick James wrote on Nov 30, 2007 2:54 PM:

Sounds like a dumb idea to me. People recovering from substance abuse living downtown where there are at least 4 bars that I can think of off the top of my head and other restraunts where alcohol is served. Not to mention that area seems to come up a lot in reports for meth busts. I guess you won't have to look far for any missing addicts if you move them in next door to their favorite bar or dealer's apartment.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections