Abandoned horses pose dilemma for ranchers


Tuesday, November 20, 2007 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
LA GRANDE (AP) — Ranchers in the old West saw their horse herds depleted by rustlers. Today people are abandoning unwanted domestic horses on ranches and public lands.

High hay prices and the closure this fall of the nation’s last domestic horsemeat processing facility in Illinois may be partly to blame.

At least nine horses have been turned loose on Wannie MacKenzie’s ranch north of Jordan Valley in the past 18 to 24 months and the Malheur County cattleman is bracing for more old and hungry horses as cash-strapped owners in Idaho’s Treasure Valley run out of winter hay.

“It’s a huge problem,” MacKenzie said. “What am I gonna do with them I don’t want 300 head of horses on my ranch.”

“We are hearing stories from all over of people abandoning horses” at livestock sale yards, said Gary Conway, spokesman for the Texas-based American Quarter Horse Association.

Cavel International in DeKalb, Ill., the nation’s last horse slaughter facility, closed in September and two in Texas did so earlier last year.

The plants had exported horse meat to Europe and elsewhere for human consumption. Their closures were hailed by animal rights advocates but their absence leaves horse owners with fewer options for dealing with animals they no longer want, Conway said.

Closure of the plants has resulted in a 400 percent increase in shipments of U.S. horses to Mexican slaughterhouses this year, said Sally Baker, spokeswoman for the 9,000-member Association of Equine Practitioners in Lexington, Ky.

Malheur County Undersheriff Brian Wolfe tries to identify owners and charge them with animal abandonment or animal abuse but 90 percent of the horses are not branded.

Killing and processing horses for meat, which happened 80,000 to 100,000 times a year across the nation, according to government figures, or euthanasia are options but not without complications.

After euthanasia, most horses are buried or burned.

A horse carcass can’t be abandoned after a vet puts the animal down because the drugs are dangerous to scavengers, said La Grande veterinarian Christopher J. McIlmoil.

Oregon brand inspector Rodger Huffman of La Grande said even a horse that dies of natural causes cannot be left within a quarter-mile of running water or within half a mile of a dwelling for more than 15 hours without being buried or incinerated.

In remote areas, horse owners sometimes just shoot the animals, something MacKenzie said he can’t bring himself to do.

But even trucking horses to Mexico and Canada may end. Congress is considering legislation to prohibit killing and processing horses for human consumption or transporting them across international boundaries for that purpose.

Derek Fink, press secretary for Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., one of the legislation’s sponsors, said horses are being hauled to slaughter in overcrowded trailers, abused by workers, and inhumanely killed.

Fink said the bills’ sponsors believe horses deserve to finish out their lives in rescue facilities or sanctuaries, not domestic slaughter plants.

“A horse is a pet in America, it is like a dog or cat,” he said.

Conway, the American Quarter Horse Association spokesman, says there are too few rescue facilities and insufficient money to care for horses destined for slaughter.

And the transportation and slaughter was more humane than what is happening to them now, he said.

The debate “has definitely been framed within an urban vs. rural mind-set,” Baker said. She said urbanites often regard horses as “companion animals.” Rural households are more likely to think of horses as working animals and be less concerned about sending them to slaughter.

Government-run horse processing plants in Mexico appear to do a humane job, Baker said, but she worries about transporting them there. Horses trucked through Mexico and Canada are not under federal jurisdiction monitoring humane treatment, she said.

But some workers in Mexico kill horses with knives, she said.

“There is no perfect answer to this problem,” Conway said. “The horse processing thing certainly is not a solution for a lot of people. But it is for a lot of others.”

———
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

shecels wrote on Nov 24, 2007 8:42 PM:

While all of us find the idea of horse slaughter distasteful, it is also a necessary part of the livestock industry. The closing of the US plants has not stopped slaughter it has just made it more traumatic for the animal, depressed the economy of the horse market and made it more costly for individuals to dispose of unwanted and unusable livestock. Now people are faced with the dilemma of trying to unburden themselves with unusable or unsuitable horses that have no value and they must either continue the cost of upkeep or the cost of euthanasia- which, if a veterinarian does it, will cost $100-$150. And then there is the disposal issue. A thousand pounds of rotting meat is not easily gotten rid of. There is no way that the Humane Society or rescue organizations can keep up with the numbers of unwanted horses. It is tragic that the government has chosen to listen to short sighted people that have patted themselves of the back for a job well done while so many horses pay the price for unregulated transportation and slaughtering methods. Slaughter bound horses deserve to be treated humanly on their journey to the processing plant and deserve as quick and painless death as we can give them. That is where the legislation needs to be.

Joe wrote on Nov 20, 2007 9:10 PM:

Richard is either JOKING or INSANE!!And By the way,Plants Scream!! When Their CHOPPED down!So Be Nice to them Too!

Concerned wrote on Nov 20, 2007 2:38 PM:

Horses are just another victim of our disposable society. We buy and dispose of animals like they are toys with little or no concern if they have to get rid of them.

Elaine wrote on Nov 20, 2007 1:45 PM:

What kind of a nut case are you? For shame! They deserve to be treated humanely, they are living breathing beings, not plants!

Richard wrote on Nov 20, 2007 12:53 PM:

Kill 'em. Just kill them if they are a problem. They're just horses for God's sake!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections