Historic district for downtown NB?
By Jessica Musicar, Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 06, 2007 |
NORTH BEND - Downtown property owners should expect a letter in the mail this month asking them to weigh in on a potential historic district proposed by the city’s Historic Landmark Commission.
The letter will detail the commission’s plan to designate the city’s historic downtown commercial core as a historic district. If a majority of targeted property holders agree, the commission will recommend it to the North Bend City Council, which will have the final say.
Intended to preserve and bolster the traditional look of downtown, which primarily contains buildings that were constructed between 1900 and 1940, the district designation would require people considering new construction projects or exterior alterations to historic buildings to meet design standards. The area is roughly bounded by the bay and waterfront to the east, McPherson Avenue to the west, Connecticut Avenue to the north and Washington Avenue to the south.
The district and its design criteria would enhance the beauty of downtown and ensure that its traditional “Main Street” style is maintained and encouraged, said commission Chairman Dick Wagner. Doing so will encourage tourists to stop and take a look, he added.
“One of the hoped-for benefits of any kind of historic district ... is the economic rejuvenation that’s hoped for,” said Commissioner Judy Wagner. “If you get a pleasing place for people to come, an attractive area that catches the drivers’ eyes as they are passing through on the highway, (it will be) a more pleasing place for pedestrian traffic.”
Dick Wagner said the proposed architectural guidelines would reinforce the existing architectural style of downtown. The commission is only concerned with exterior components.
“The guidelines encourage any facade change to be in keeping with the original buildings and structures,” he said.
The guidelines would come into play when a property owner in the district applies for a building permit with the city. Any proposal would have to go before the Landmark Commission, which will serve as a design review committee.
“(Then), assuming it gets approved by us and it meets all the other applicable city regulations, then presumably it just goes ahead,” Dick Wagner said.
He noted each applicant will have to maintain the look of his property in accordance with the era in which it was built.
“If Engles (Furniture) is within the historic district and they want to make a change, then their project plan would be submitted to the design review committee because they are within the district,” he said.
The district designation also would enable property owners to take advantage of assistance programs, including low-interest loans available for facade improvements and special building code considerations.
According to the letter, to approve an application for the alteration of a designated landmark or the major alteration of a historic resource of statewide significance, the commission must find that the proposal meets review criteria for designated landmarks (see sidebar).
City Planner David Voss said the historic district will be a good fit for the city.
“There is basically no design review or design control in the downtown or anywhere for that matter, other than your basic set-back stuff and landscaping the parking lot.
“So, (this is) just to preserve the character and the look, the feel of the traditional downtown,” Voss said. “It’s really going to be up to the property owners. We need their support. It’s not going to happen without their consent and cooperation.”
He added that the commission will be able to turn down designs, although property owners will be able to appeal to the City Council.
Tags »
Proposed criteria for historic landmarks
According to a letter that will be mailed to property owners in the boundaries of a proposed historic district, the North Bend Historic Landmark Commission plans to implement the following review criteria within the city'€™s historic downtown commercial core:
* A property shall be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships.
* The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The relocation of distinctive materials or alterations of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property shall be minimized.
* A property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding unrelated features or elements from other historic properties, shall not be undertaken.
* Change to a property that has acquired historic significance in its own right shall be retained and preserved.
* Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved.
* Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
* Chemical and physical treatments, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used.
* Archaeological resources shall be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
* New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials, features and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.
* New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner, that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
Embed This Article
Feel free to embed this article onto your website by copying the
code below and pasting it into your site's HTML.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines