Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Chances appear slim for effort to block gay rights
By Brad Cain, Associated Press Writer
Saturday, October 06, 2007 | No comments posted.
SALEM - With few signatures to spare, gay rights opponents say it will take a miracle for their referendum effort to succeed in blocking two new gay rights laws from taking effect Jan. 1.
“We are still full of hope. But it’s going to be very close,” former state Sen. Marylin Shannon said Friday as state election officials completed a preliminary tally of signatures submitted for the two proposed referrals.
With the petition signatures now going to county clerks for checking, it appears doubtful there are enough signatures to send the referral measures to the November 2008 ballot — a prospect that heartens gay rights backers.
“We certainly hope that Oregon won’t have to put these two laws on hold for almost a full year,” said John Hummel of Basic Rights Oregon, the state’s largest gay rights advocacy group.
The referendum campaign by the social conservative and church groups is aimed at derailing laws passed by the 2007 Legislature to legalize domestic partnerships for same-sex couples and ban discrimination based on sexual orientation.
A preliminary tally by state elections officials indicated there were 60,531 signatures for the measure to force an election vote on the domestic partnership law.
County clerks will have until Oct. 26 to verify that at least 55,179 of those signatures are valid to trigger an election. That would require a validity rate of 91 percent, which has been reached just once in recent years.
The effort to sidetrack the anti-discrimination law faces an even taller hurdle, since the state’s preliminary count showed 59,751 signatures, meaning that 92 percent of those signatures would have to be deemed valid.
“It would have to be a very high validity rate for both” referrals to suspend the two laws, said Mary Conley of the Oregon secretary of state’s office.
Undaunted by the thin signature margin, Shannon said opponents of the gay rights laws are prepared to launch an initiative campaign to place a repeal of both new laws on the November 2008 ballot. Backers of such a move would have until next July to gather signatures.
Still, gay rights backers will consider it a major victory if the current effort to refer the measures to the 2008 ballot falls flat, Hummel said.
“Even if we faced an initiative campaign, our new laws wouldn’t be put on hold for a year, and that would be wonderful news,” the Basic Rights Oregon spokesman said.
“We are still full of hope. But it’s going to be very close,” former state Sen. Marylin Shannon said Friday as state election officials completed a preliminary tally of signatures submitted for the two proposed referrals.
With the petition signatures now going to county clerks for checking, it appears doubtful there are enough signatures to send the referral measures to the November 2008 ballot — a prospect that heartens gay rights backers.
“We certainly hope that Oregon won’t have to put these two laws on hold for almost a full year,” said John Hummel of Basic Rights Oregon, the state’s largest gay rights advocacy group.
The referendum campaign by the social conservative and church groups is aimed at derailing laws passed by the 2007 Legislature to legalize domestic partnerships for same-sex couples and ban discrimination based on sexual orientation.
A preliminary tally by state elections officials indicated there were 60,531 signatures for the measure to force an election vote on the domestic partnership law.
County clerks will have until Oct. 26 to verify that at least 55,179 of those signatures are valid to trigger an election. That would require a validity rate of 91 percent, which has been reached just once in recent years.
The effort to sidetrack the anti-discrimination law faces an even taller hurdle, since the state’s preliminary count showed 59,751 signatures, meaning that 92 percent of those signatures would have to be deemed valid.
“It would have to be a very high validity rate for both” referrals to suspend the two laws, said Mary Conley of the Oregon secretary of state’s office.
Undaunted by the thin signature margin, Shannon said opponents of the gay rights laws are prepared to launch an initiative campaign to place a repeal of both new laws on the November 2008 ballot. Backers of such a move would have until next July to gather signatures.
Still, gay rights backers will consider it a major victory if the current effort to refer the measures to the 2008 ballot falls flat, Hummel said.
“Even if we faced an initiative campaign, our new laws wouldn’t be put on hold for a year, and that would be wonderful news,” the Basic Rights Oregon spokesman said.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines