DeFazio calls for rail probe

By Elise Hamner, City Editor
Friday, September 28, 2007 | 7 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio is calling for a Federal Railroad Administration investigation into the Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad’s closure of the Coos Bay short line.

DeFazio sent the agency’s administrator, Joseph Boardman, a letter Wednesday asking his agency to review CORP engineering reports. They are scheduled to talk Tuesday. DeFazio also wants the agency’s inspectors on the ground — in railroad tunnels the company deemed unsafe.

“I also request that FRA tunnel inspectors perform a physical inspection of the line and evaluate what, if any, repairs are necessary to make the line safe for operation,” DeFazio wrote.

The letter followed the railroad’s action to file an embargo on the line Sept. 21. The embargo indicated the line was closed because three tunnels are unsafe. On Thursday, the railroad agency’s public affairs specialist, Warren Flatau, didn’t say how soon FRA inspectors might be on the Coos Bay line’s tracks.

“I wouldn’t want to speculate,” he said.

“Unequivocally, we will seek to be fully responsive to the congressman’s concerns,” he added.

More pressure

The state of Oregon also wants answers.

Railroad officials said they based their decision to close the tracks on engineers’ reports and their concern about employee safety. The governor’s office and the Oregon Department of Transportation’s Rail Division are demanding copies of the private engineering reports. The state hadn’t received copies as of Thursday morning.

But that’s not the only pressure on the railroad.

ODOT has put on hold plans to give CORP $7 million from the 2005 Legislature’s Connect Oregon program to help build a $9.6 million rail yard next to an existing one in Winchester.

“That project comes into question with all the recent events,” said Kelly Taylor, Rail Division administrator.

It’s unusual for a private railroad to get any public money. But, the railroad made a convincing case.

The project was to alleviate over capacity at the rail yard in Roseburg. The railroad had said in a grant request two years ago that the project would give forest products companies more opportunities to ship by rail. The Coos Bay line served at least three South Coast wood products companies, which now have no direct access to rail service.

“We need to understand what’s happening, what’s going on and whether or not this project should go forward,” Taylor said.

On Wednesday, the final train slowly slid out of Coos Bay. The engineer aboard said he was heading out to pick up the railcars remaining at the sawmill on the North Spit. Those cars were leaving the area for Eugene this morning. CORP has told sawmill managers this is the last load.

Silence on the line

CORP has issued no public statements since an initial press release announcing the closure. But this week, railroad officials sat down with members of the Southwest Oregon Economic Expansion and Transportation Team in a closed door meeting in Roseburg. The group gathered as it has for nearly two years to talk about the Oregon Gateway project to attract a container shipping terminal development to Coos Bay. CORP and Union Pacific staffers are part of that group, as they have been all along.

People attending the meeting reported that the Coos Bay line closure came up. The conversation was tense. CORP officials reportedly said the railroad had invested $47 million over the years in upgrading tracks in Oregon. Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, apparently challenged that. He demanded to see the documents proving it.

Throughout those meetings in the past, the group has discussed poor conditions of the CORP’s tracks on the Siskiyou line down to California, said Rep. Susan Morgan, R-Myrtle Creek.

“The railroad has made no secret about it,” she said.

In fact, the railroad is under a 2-year-old safety compliance agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration. The feds issued it less than two years ago after deciding the railroad was inadequately maintaining and inspecting its tracks. The agreement pointed out that in visits to CORP tracks in Oregon from 1998 to late 2005, FRA and state inspectors found 4,067 noncompliance conditions. That included everything from gauge defects to defective cross ties, rails and rail joints. There was no mention of tunnels.

Profit or not?

Repairs are costly, especially now when rail business might be slowing.

Morgan said she knows sawmills have cut production due to a slump in the housing market, which undoubtedly has affected shipments to the railroad. A Georgia-Pacific employee said that has been a factor in a slowdown in operations at the Coos Bay sawmill. No numbers are available on the exact number of rail cars heading from the South Coast to Eugene.

In 2003, the railroad company took a big hit when Weyerhaeuser Co. closed its mill on the North Spit. Then, the railroad lost 315 cars per month. This year in an annual report to the Oregon Railroad Division, CORP said it moved 45,017 rail cars on its Oregon tracks in 2006. Taylor estimated 10 to 15 percent of those came from the Coos Bay line and said she has no idea whether the line was profitable. It’s a private business. The company doesn’t have to share that information.

“It either generates revenue or you don’t do it anymore,” she said.

Speculation

In the end, though, state officials and local lawmakers say they are disturbed most by the attitude and responses of officials of CORP and its parent company RailAmerica. When asked what their plan is to repair the Coos Bay short line and re-open for business, officials were blunt.

“We have no plans,” Taylor said of CORP’s response this week to the officials gathered at the meeting in Roseburg.

“They got asked again, ‘We have no plans,’” Taylor said of the repeated response.

“Saying you are calling an embargo with no plan is absurd,” she added.

That’s led to speculation.

“If you’re not going to make repairs, then you head down the abandonment line,” Taylor said.

There’s a federal process required for abandonment. In the end, simply it can mean a railroad walks away. It can pull up its tracks, sell them for scrap and sell the right of way.

There have been rumors of exactly that. In past months railroad online bloggers have suggested the railroad might also end operations on the Siskiyou line. CORP reportedly denied that when pressed for an answer.

“It’s a real negative atmosphere when everybody is basing the discussions on rumors,” Morgan said. “What we really need is the CORP to sit down at the table.”
Tags »

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

jdlampke wrote on Nov 7, 2007 7:32 AM:

Steve; By your statement that the railroad should be closed, you have shown a definite lack of knowledge of all the issues, as well as a definite lack of vision for the future of all concerned. Trucks pollute. Trucks cause traffic problems. Trucks tear up the highways. Trucks are the worse way to go in the long run. Plus, who do you think will pay for the increased cost of the products from the mills, as a result of the increased shipping costs? Everybody needs to sit down and work this out. That railroad line MUST be repaired and operable. Even if the State picked up 100% of the repair bill, it would pay off in the long run. Coos Bay needs a good and reliable railroad to attract containerized shipping. In the long run, it could be a gold mine for Coos Bay.

Milo Kleitsch wrote on Oct 9, 2007 12:21 AM:

Contact CORP / RailAmerica and the ODOT immediately! Don't let either entity sleep a single minute this week! Demand that rail service to Coos Bay be retained for public and economic benefit. Any action less than that on the part of the public and local governments is not an action at all! Milo Kleitsch Tigard, Oregon

William wrote on Oct 6, 2007 8:12 AM:

Steves an idiot if he thinks that closing down the railroad.screwy all that would is tear up the highway coming from the coast and cause more traffic accidents.

Not Steve wrote on Oct 5, 2007 1:59 PM:

Gee, Steve, do highways run in the positive? One truck does the damage of hundreds of cars, and the public pays that. Transportation is a system, and it's been out-of-balance in America for too long because Americans like Steve think 'railroads cost money, but highways are provided by God.' If highways are provided by God, Steve's argument makes sense. But in reality, and in the long run, abandoning the Coos Bay line will be regretted by genereations to come, not to mention all the people dealing with all the truck traffic. --RelentlessCactus

Milo Kleitsch wrote on Oct 5, 2007 9:31 AM:

Yes, the U.S. housing market and lumber industry is in a slump, but using that argument as a justification for closing the line is a fallacy. Economies and fortunes ebb and flow, but customers on the Coos Bay line will forever require access to the national rail network. Historically, railroads are the most safe, cost-effective, and environmentally freindly means of transporting bulk commodities and carload traffic. One can speculate on CORP / RailAmerica's motives, but the bottom line is that local government and customers must do whatever it takes to perserve rail service.

HedgeTHis wrote on Oct 2, 2007 6:49 PM:

Fortress just realized they needed the cash and want to reduce the leverage on RRA's balance sheet. They would give the whole CORP away but there would be no takers so the solution is to incrementally abandon it pull up the tracks and run to the bank with the proceeds. Fortress is the new robber barons of the railroad industry. Oh! I forgot they overpaid for RailAmerica. Talk to John Giles at RRA not local officials. RailAmerica wants to abandon this line or shake the state down for a big subsidy. New management won't spend capital on existing railroads which make money so they definately won't spend it here. Public/Private partnership is a joke. Please do not humor us. Fortress way over paid for RailAmerica so what's a couple of million for the CORP. They have tried to play hard ball with the Class I railroads and failed. Don't succumb to this nonsense. Call John Giles (RRA CEO) and Joe Adams at Fortress and express your displeasure.

Steve wrote on Sep 28, 2007 3:38 PM:

I think the rail between coos bay and eugene should go away and that will do a few good things for the community. All the wood products should be moved by truck. This will allow for more jobs. Which in turn will build the economy. The rail road runs in the negative and recieves money from the federal government. Why not take that money and create jobs and build the economy?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections