Various pieces of steel fill a staging area near the new airport terminal in North Bend on Monday. The steel skeleton of the new terminal at the Southwestern Oregon Regional Airport has begun to take shape around the concrete pieces raised a couple of weeks ago on the $18 million project.
World Photos by Lou Sennick
Coos County Airport District board members, who have tackled numerous financial decisions related to a new terminal at Southwest Oregon Regional Airport in recent months, Thursday found two more funding requests dropped on their plates.
One was to fix a 40-year-old leaky roof on a maintenance building, and the other to fill an area where construction crews unexpectedly hit a watertable on the taxiway leading to the partially constructed new terminal.
The bill for the roof will come in at a little over $16,000, and the cost to fix the taxiway will be about $43,000.
Although the taxiway drainage problem was a surprise to board members and the repair cost more than twice as much as the new roof on the maintenance building, it was the re-roofing project that proved to be contentious.
For board members Mike Lehman, chairman; John Briggs; Clair Jones; Joe Benetti; and Helen Brunell Mineau, the question was whether to have the labor done in-house or hire a roofing company to do the work. Airport Executive Director Gary LeTellier presented two bids, both in the $16,500 range. He recommended the work be done by airport employees during hours they would be there anyway. The labor cost was a little more than $8,000, and materials were also a little more than $8,000, adding up to about the same.
“By committing the staff to do this, are there other things they could be doing?” Lehman asked.
LeTellier said there are other projects, but the roofing would take about a week and a half and some of the other projects were indoors and could be done during the winter.
“The big advantage is we'd be paying our employees already,” LeTellier said.
Briggs pointed out that the roofing company's workers would already have workers compensation benefits.
LeTellier said he wasn't sure about the airport workers, as far as workers compensation, and would have to look into it.
“You guys spend money like crazy. Go ahead and do it,” said Jones.
“Don't give me this about saving money!” Lehman said. “It's going from one pot into another.”
The acrimonious exchange continued as board members reached a decision.
“I feel if we're close to one of the bids, that we should go with one of the bids,” said Benetti.
At Benetti's suggestion, board members voted 6-1 to take approximately $12,500 from the maintenance fund, which the board had estimated for the project in the budget, and transfer it to one of the airport district's general reserve fund and hire James Bush Roofing to do the estimated $16,412 re-roofing project.
Jones voted no.
“What the hell. It's only money,” he said to the other board members.
Airport district board members have been dealing with financial issues surrounding the new terminal that is under construction, and a tower that, if the Federal Aviation Administration approves of the site, could enter the permitting process by September, Clifford Newton, the terminal's project manager, announced Thursday. The $17 million terminal will be paid in half by Oregon Lottery funds, with the remaining $5.9 million borrowed through a contractual agreement with the Oregon Economic & Community Development Department; and $4 million obtained through a series of federal entitlement funds. The $3 million tower will be funded through a Federal Aviation Administration earmarked grant.
Newton told board members about an approximate 10,000-foot stretch of taxiway, starting with the apron directly in front of the terminal, where workers have excavated down to the groundwater table level. He said the area is at 20 percent saturation and it needs to be at 12 percent. The project's construction company, Skanska USA Building Inc., a subsidiary of Skanska AB, Stockholm, Sweden, needs $43,000 to replace about a foot of sand with 4 inches of drain rock, cover that with a fabric, then move soil on top of that to get ready for paving.
“We've examined the prices and it seemed very reasonable, although higher than we hoped,” said Newton.
The board unanimously approved paying for the repairs of the taxiway from a terminal project contingency fund.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
No deliberately false information.
No obscenity or racially offensive language.
No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
No information that invades another person's privacy.
No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.
Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
From all the available information that we have seen and read, we believe that Mr Newton, the Project Manager, is doing a fine job. Keep the good work up!
I think everything will workout fine. i think the project manager, Mr. Newton will get the job done and save as much money as possible. It doesn't benifit him to spend more money. He has a job to do and he is doing it. So stop whinning and lets get excited about the new growth and opportunities in the Coos Bay area.
Why pay for this?
Perhaps it would be better for this town to have more pan handlers and more crappy roads to encourage investment.
Or a bizarre alternative would be to encourage meth labs into our town by catering to felons on parole?
These Terminal issues should have been identified before the project started? The high bidder on this project was INEPT and should be removed. Or the manager of the project failed?
Cut the losses and git'r done!
Looks like the Board. is asssting the business of James Bush Roofing by giving them a contract for roof repair. It is most interesting to me to note that currently employed District employees could have done the job with no additional costs for labor, and appearently without interfering with their other duties! Looks to me like we taxpayers lost an opportunity to save around $8,000. While James Bush Roofing gets an $8,000 welfare benefit !
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines