New natural gas line proposed from Columbia River to Molalla


Monday, July 16, 2007 | 1 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
McMINNVILLE, Ore. (AP) - Representatives from two West Coast energy companies were in Yamhill County this week to talk to city officials about running a natural gas line from a Columbia River shipping terminal to a hub on the West Coast mainline at Molalla.

The so-called Palomar line would start at Bradwood, near Westport. It was presented by TransCanada Corp., based in Calgary, Alberta, and Oregon's NW Natural.

TransCanada declined comment on the line when contacted by local media.

“At this point in the project, we have nothing to say publicly,” said company spokesman David Dodson. “It'll be soon, but it won't be today.”

NW Natural confirmed it had been talking with TransCanada about the feasibility of a spur feeding into the main interstate gas transmission line.

“We have been in continuing discussions with TransCanada to determine the feasibility of whether this project makes sense,” said spokesman Steve Sechrist. “That may be what you're hearing about.”

Oregon LNG has also proposed a natural gas pipeline to locate a plant at a different site. The Palomar line would run east from the Molalla hub on the main West Coast line, known as Williams' Northwest Pipeline, to the TransCanada line near Madras in Jefferson County.

On its way down from the proposed LNG terminal at Bradwood, the Palomar line would intersect with a natural gas field near the Columbia County community of Mist. TransCanada is one of several companies jockeying for position as federal energy regulators consider proposals for more than a dozen new liquefied natural gas delivery terminals around the United States.

Oregon LNG proposes using supertankers to ferry natural gas across the ocean in supercooled liquid form. It proposes building a plant on Warrenton's Skipanon Peninsula to offload the imported LNG, revaporize it and pump it to a point on the main transmission line serving the West Coast.

Daniel Serres, a staffer with the Columbia River Clean Energy Coalition, said the only pipeline out of Bradwood he knew about was one that would head north across the Columbia River. He said he'd not previously heard about an Oregon component.

“This is really very surprising,” he said. “I am just amazed that they got this far with it without having to show their cards. This is a huge project.”
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

forlng wrote on Jul 17, 2007 8:47 PM:

To set the record straight folks...this was never a part of the Bradwood Landing project and they have not been in "talks" with the companies involved. When the location of the facility was noted to be in close proximity to the Mist facility, it was brought up by those companies that if the Bradwood site is built, it would be good to utilize gas from there. But Bradwood itself has never been in negotiation with either company.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections