Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Judge rules state cannot retroactively reduce pension funds
Thursday, June 21, 2007 | No comments posted.
SALEM (AP) - A Multnomah County judge ruled that the state pension fund can't retroactively reduce the retirement benefits of retired public employees.
Judge Henry Kantor's decision Wednesday derails the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System's plan to retrieve money from 38,000 workers who retired between April 1, 2000, and March 31, 2004.
Those public employees are considered to have excessive pensions because the pension board credited their accounts with 20 percent interest earnings for 1999, rather than the 11 percent called for under pension rules.
“I believe that this is in fact a substantial victory for public employees who worked hard for many years for the citizens of Oregon and then retired with the expectation that the state would pay the retirement benefits promised to them,” said Gene Mechanic, an attorney for retirees.
But the ruling is a defeat for 200,000 Oregon public employees who will get reduced pensions when they retire because the state has no other legal way to recover $800 million worth of overpayments. The Legislature rewrote the rules for the public employee retirement plans in 2003 to try to deal with runaway costs for public employers.
The 2003 law gives the state two ways to recoup overpaid pensions: Cancel the overpaid retirees cost-of-living adjustments or make future retirees bear the cost. After that law passed, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that canceling cost-of-living adjustments was illegal.
That left the state with just one choice: Make younger public employees take smaller pensions so the public employees who mistakenly got extra-large pensions can keep them.
A separate law gives the retirement system other ways to get back overpayments to retirees. For retirees who took a lump sum payment upon retirement, the retirement system requested they pay back an average of $28,000.
But the 2003 law outweighs the other law in this case, Kantor ruled.
“I'm delighted,” said former Portland Water Bureau employee Michael Arken, one of the retired workers who filed the lawsuit.
Arken got a letter from PERS earlier this year telling him how much he owed, and notifying him how much his pension checks would be reduced in the future. His pension payments were reduced starting this spring, Arken said.
Judge Henry Kantor's decision Wednesday derails the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System's plan to retrieve money from 38,000 workers who retired between April 1, 2000, and March 31, 2004.
Those public employees are considered to have excessive pensions because the pension board credited their accounts with 20 percent interest earnings for 1999, rather than the 11 percent called for under pension rules.
“I believe that this is in fact a substantial victory for public employees who worked hard for many years for the citizens of Oregon and then retired with the expectation that the state would pay the retirement benefits promised to them,” said Gene Mechanic, an attorney for retirees.
But the ruling is a defeat for 200,000 Oregon public employees who will get reduced pensions when they retire because the state has no other legal way to recover $800 million worth of overpayments. The Legislature rewrote the rules for the public employee retirement plans in 2003 to try to deal with runaway costs for public employers.
The 2003 law gives the state two ways to recoup overpaid pensions: Cancel the overpaid retirees cost-of-living adjustments or make future retirees bear the cost. After that law passed, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that canceling cost-of-living adjustments was illegal.
That left the state with just one choice: Make younger public employees take smaller pensions so the public employees who mistakenly got extra-large pensions can keep them.
A separate law gives the retirement system other ways to get back overpayments to retirees. For retirees who took a lump sum payment upon retirement, the retirement system requested they pay back an average of $28,000.
But the 2003 law outweighs the other law in this case, Kantor ruled.
“I'm delighted,” said former Portland Water Bureau employee Michael Arken, one of the retired workers who filed the lawsuit.
Arken got a letter from PERS earlier this year telling him how much he owed, and notifying him how much his pension checks would be reduced in the future. His pension payments were reduced starting this spring, Arken said.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines