'08 Olympics
The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Irrigators closer to water settlement
Font Size:
Wednesday, April 25, 2007 | No comments posted.
KLAMATH FALLS (AP) - After two years, the end may be in sight for settlement talks in the dispute over water rights and four Klamath River hydroelectric dams operated by PacifiCorp.
The Portland-based utility invited 28 groups, including state and federal agencies, three county governments, irrigators, four American Indian tribes and environmental organizations into the settlement negotiations.
Now, the groups involved say they expect to release details of a settlement in a few weeks to a few months. The settlement is expected to lead to the Klamath Summit, an event promised by the governors of Oregon and California last year to address watershed issues.
The settlement talks included discussions on affordable power rates for irrigators, the sustainability of fish in the Klamath River and the dependability of water supplies throughout the watershed.
Dan Keppen of the Family Farm Alliance said problems with water issues in the Klamath Basin and along the Klamath River have been building up for a number of years.
Events such as a decision to shut off irrigation water to save fish in 2001 created rifts in communities and between government agencies.
Keppen said that many of the negotiating methods employed to resolve those issues added to the conflict - including lawsuits, aggressive legislation and attacks through the media.
“It just wasn't healthy at all,” he said.
When the relicensing for the dams came up, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission provided PacifiCorp the option of a settlement with involved stakeholders - or the traditional legal and technical process that works through petitions and testimony. The utility decided to try both options.
Greg Addington, executive director of the Klamath Water Users Association, said the mix of groups influenced his organization to introduce discussions of water supplies, affordable power and the possibility of reintroducing migratory fish species to the Klamath Basin.
“It's not often you get two states, the feds and four tribes in the same room,” he said.
Addington noted that with so many different groups working on complex issues, individual philosophies were going to be challenged.
Both he and Craig Tucker, Klamath Campaign coordinator for the Karuk Tribe of California, said that some groups tied up the negotiations at times, causing old feelings to resurface and the process to get bogged down. The Karuk Tribe is seeking the sustainability of fish species in the river as a resource for tribal members.
But the efforts are paying off, participants said.
“It's pretty damn impressive that it's the farmers and the tribes that get along the best of any two groups in the room,” Tucker said.
The Portland-based utility invited 28 groups, including state and federal agencies, three county governments, irrigators, four American Indian tribes and environmental organizations into the settlement negotiations.
Now, the groups involved say they expect to release details of a settlement in a few weeks to a few months. The settlement is expected to lead to the Klamath Summit, an event promised by the governors of Oregon and California last year to address watershed issues.
The settlement talks included discussions on affordable power rates for irrigators, the sustainability of fish in the Klamath River and the dependability of water supplies throughout the watershed.
Dan Keppen of the Family Farm Alliance said problems with water issues in the Klamath Basin and along the Klamath River have been building up for a number of years.
Events such as a decision to shut off irrigation water to save fish in 2001 created rifts in communities and between government agencies.
Keppen said that many of the negotiating methods employed to resolve those issues added to the conflict - including lawsuits, aggressive legislation and attacks through the media.
“It just wasn't healthy at all,” he said.
When the relicensing for the dams came up, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission provided PacifiCorp the option of a settlement with involved stakeholders - or the traditional legal and technical process that works through petitions and testimony. The utility decided to try both options.
Greg Addington, executive director of the Klamath Water Users Association, said the mix of groups influenced his organization to introduce discussions of water supplies, affordable power and the possibility of reintroducing migratory fish species to the Klamath Basin.
“It's not often you get two states, the feds and four tribes in the same room,” he said.
Addington noted that with so many different groups working on complex issues, individual philosophies were going to be challenged.
Both he and Craig Tucker, Klamath Campaign coordinator for the Karuk Tribe of California, said that some groups tied up the negotiations at times, causing old feelings to resurface and the process to get bogged down. The Karuk Tribe is seeking the sustainability of fish species in the river as a resource for tribal members.
But the efforts are paying off, participants said.
“It's pretty damn impressive that it's the farmers and the tribes that get along the best of any two groups in the room,” Tucker said.
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines