A wave breaks off the southern Oregon Coast as wind blows some of the surf backward. That wave attraction is attracting power producers. To date, seven projects are proposed for the Oregon Coast, to tether power-generating buoys to the ocean floor to ride ocean swells.
World File Photo
CHARLESTON - Commercial fishermen are accustomed to dealing with waves, but not the wave of tidal energy project proposals.
Several crabbers, salmon trollers and beach trawlers met Monday at the Charleston Marina RV Park recreation center to learn about what many viewed as the next threat to their livelihood.
“It kind of feels like a gold rush,” Oregon Coastal Zone Management Association Executive Director Onno Husing, said.
Husing was one of the organizers of the meeting, designed as an informal get-together to learn about two potential wave-energy parks proposed for ocean areas off Coos County, one in the Reedsport area and others.
To date, seven projects are proposed for the Oregon Coast. Each would consist of buoys tethered to the ocean floor that ride ocean swells. Internally, each buoy would have elements that would harness a portion of the swells' energy, convert it to electricity and transmit it to shore. Some proposals call for up to 200 buoys in a single area, up to about 5 square miles. All must be approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Rumors abound about other projects proposed but that haven't been officially filed with FERC.
The bottom line, Husing started to say, phrasing it more as a question, is that one or two areas may be OK.
No, Charleston salmon troller Paul Merz said, interrupting Husing. Those ocean areas already have an existing use, from border to border, he added.
“They should be coming to us,” Merz continued, noting that the companies or organizations moving ahead with the wave energy parks should be talking to existing users of the ocean: commercial fishermen, recreational fishermen, commercial shippers.
Commercial Dungeness crabbers could see the most change in their fishing patterns. The placement of the buoy arrays matches prime crab ground: depths of between 20 and 40 fathoms on expanses of sandy ocean bottom.
Salmon trollers also traverse the areas while seeking Chinook and beach trawlers find sources of some flatfish.
Salmon and crab fisherman Tim Smith, who fishes the Irish Miss out of Winchester Bay, picked up on the gold rush idea.
“They're claim jumping,” Smith said. “They're taking that (area) away.”
Projects already under way
Wave energy companies most often go through a two-step process to get approval from FERC (see sidebar), but not always. They can skip applying for a preliminary permit and simply apply for a license - as Finavera Renewables did when it applied for a project in Washington.
FERC already has approved three preliminary permits, giving three entities approval to test sites for the feasibility of operating more than one or two buoys at a site (see sidebar). Only one license is pending approval.
Ocean Power Technologies, with U.S. offices in New Jersey, plans to have the first buoy in the water off Reedsport this summer.
Some of the companies applying for permits to operate wave energy parks in the U.S. are foreign-owned, with offices in North America. Several companies already have demonstrated the value of tidal energy technology in Europe. Finavera Renewables, for example, is an Irish firm but has offices in Canada and the U.S. It has applied for a permit to study the feasibility of a park near Bandon.
Fishermen weren't happy about the overseas component of wave energy. If the companies get subsidized to build here, where do the profits go, several asked - do they stay in the United States or go overseas?
Furthermore, they said, the issue of fishing grounds is the main issue, and the state and federal involvement in accepting energy parks that could displace the fleet.
For instance, “crabbers,” Smith said. “(They're) going to push us aside for foreign money?”
Charleston fisherman Daryl Bogardus questioned the economic importance of the parks, too.
“I don't think the wave-generation buoys would generate as much (money) as crab fishing,” Bogardus said.
Most fishermen agreed that somehow, some way, they should be compensated for the loss of fishing grounds and that indeed, the fleet needs to be an integral part of the process.
Already, crabbers in the Reedsport and Winchester Bay areas have been included in ongoing talks with Ocean Power Technologies about the park impacts there.
Husing proposed establishing a statewide committee with representatives from the fishing fleet in each port to stay up-to-date on wave energy developments.
It also needs to be pro-active, he said, by obtaining legal advice, finding experts on FERC processes, doing socioeconomic studies, working with the state's Congressional delegation and working with other state and federal agencies.
“As a group, as an industry, we need to assert ourselves that there already is a use here,” Merz agreed.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
No deliberately false information.
No obscenity or racially offensive language.
No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
No information that invades another person's privacy.
No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.
Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Foreign investment in technologies affecting the resources of the Continental United States are not red herring issues. They are real issues. Since the days of Magnuson Act, NOAA has mangaged offshore fishery resources for and on behalf of the citizens of the United States. Simply because people from other nations have technological means to produce a little energy off our shores does not entitle them to install their equipment, carte blanche, inside the coastal exclusion zone on the continental shelf of the United States. We are still a soveriegn nation and are the stewards of our ocean resources and really do not wish or need any foreign interferance with how we utilize the resource.
The "observers" comments clearly represents the "globalist corporate" adgenda that will not, in any way, be friendly to the citizens on the Oregon coast nor the United States at large, no matter how legalistically the comments are couched.
5 square miles at a maximum per wave generation project is a very tiny amount of fishing/crabbing area to give up compared to the size of the Pacific Ocean grounds upon which the fishermen operate. The fishermen will have to share. Bringing up who owns the corporations that want to develop the technology is a red herring. Anyone, foreign or domestic, can jump into the water on this kind of energy development, including the fishermen themselves if they so wish. "Claim jumping" is also unjustifiable to mention as fishermen have no private title to the resources of the ocean unlike a real minerals claim on land. If this is the kind of PR campaign the fishermen wish to run, then they will lose credibility with some portion (yet unknown) of the public. On the other hand if they can prove actual economic damages in court or arbitration, then I am all for the corporations involved in paying the damages. New times bring new ways and the future days of the commercial trawler are not going to be the way things were back in the 1960's.
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines