Bills from ex-auditor weigh on CB council

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Thursday, February 08, 2007 | No comments posted.

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COOS BAY - The City Council formally approved an agreement with a Tigard audit firm Tuesday night, but it was outstanding bills from the previous auditor that occupied much of the councilors' attention.

In an e-mail sent to Interim City Manager Joyce Jansen on Jan. 24, city attorney Nate McClintock suggested the council not pay all of a bill submitted by Wall & Wall P.C.

After the Coos Bay firm canceled its audit of city finances on Jan. 2, it sent the city an invoice Jan. 16 totaling $29,092.50, a substantial amount more than the original contract of $16,708.75. Auditor Rob Wall justified the bigger bill by saying his independence as a financial reviewer was compromised by an e-mail from the city's finance director. As a result, Wall argued, he needed to do more work to mitigate his concerns and perform the job thoroughly and properly.

The result: supplemental bills of $938.75 and $11,445.

The city initially paid $10,938.75 in November, leaving $18,153.75 on the balance.

The primary issue of contention, however, was whether Wall & Wall should be paid the rest.

McClintock contended the city should not feel obligated to pay the remainder of the original contract.

“Wall and Wall has not kept (its) side of the agreement, as Wall and Wall has not completed a financial audit,” he wrote. “Since it was Wall and Wall's decision to ‘disengage' from (its) obligation under the agreement, I do not see how or why the city should be responsible for anything more (than) that which has been paid.”

McClintock also argued against paying the full amount of the supplemental bills. He questioned the hours claimed by Wall & Wall for certain tasks and said the city should not be charged twice for meetings where two accountants were present.

Citing the potential for litigation over the financial matter, Councilor Roger Gould asked that the council move into executive session to talk.

“There are some legal issues stirring in the background that we all need to be cognizant about,” he said. “It's just not black and white.”

Before going into closed session, Gould noted that Wall & Wall could argue it was compelled to disengage because of the conduct of city staff, not by its own volition.

After the executive session, which lasted less than a half-hour, Mayor Jeff McKeown requested that McClintock contact Wall & Wall's attorney, review the bills and report back to the council.

Earlier, the council had approved a $27,000 contract with Pauly Rogers and Company P.C. of Tigard to complete the audit process. The company will provide the city a completed financial assessment by the end of March.

McKeown said he spoke with the firm to see if it might lower its price if work performed by Wall & Wall can be used to expedite the process.

“But the important thing is, Pauly Rogers is reviewing the numbers and we are well on our way to get a final result and get all this behind us.”

In other business Tuesday night, the council:

€ requested city staff examine the feasibility of relocating Channel 14, the government-access cable channel, from its office in Ed Lund Park. Resident Jim Loftin wants the city to consider giving his group maintenance oversight for the park. Loftin indicated his group would not be interested, however, if it were not able to supervise the building.

€ approved the purchase of two 2007 Ford Crown Victorias at a total cost of $67,448 for police patrol cars; and,

€ appointed Councilor Michele Burnette to the audit committee, joining McKeown, Gould and Councilor John Muenchrath.

To see Nate McClintock's letter and billing documents, click Here
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

No comments posted.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections