Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Pentagon maps plan to send more troops to Iraq
By Lolita C. Baldor, Associated Press Writer
Saturday, December 30, 2006 | No comments posted.
WASHINGTON - As President Bush mulls over possible changes in Iraq policy, military planners are mapping out a number of options for a surge of U.S. troops, if that is one of the decisions he makes.
Pentagon officials said Friday that any surge of forces into Iraq would be done by extending units currently there, moving units into Iraq earlier than planned, or shifting them from other locations around the world.
The most immediate and likely move would be to shift the 2nd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division from Kuwait - where it is expected to deploy early next month - into Iraq, said the officials, who requested anonymity because no decisions have been made.
That brigade is being sent to Kuwait to serve as the reserve force, and military commanders have routinely moved the reserve force into Iraq when needed. A typical brigade is about 3,500 soldiers, and moving them in would give an instant boost of troops.
Several officials said that military planners have been working on an array of options, but no one will know what units could be affected until the president decides how many troops he needs, and how quickly they have to be in Iraq.
Another popular option would be extending Marine units already in Iraq. Currently the 5th and 7th Regimental Combat Teams are serving in Western Iraq. Both are scheduled to move out early next year, but could be ordered to stay for a longer period of time. Each regimental team has about 7,000 marines.
The Army's 1st Brigade, 1st Armored Division is scheduled to come home early next year, and that Army unit has already been extended for about 45 days. It likely would not be extended again, the officials said.
Several other Army brigades are scheduled to deploy to Iraq for the normal rotation of units to the battlefront and some of those could be moved in more quickly if needed, although some were in Iraq less than a year ago. The Pentagon has tried not to send any units back before they have had a year home.
A surge in troops has been one of the options under discussion by the administration, but it would likely be coupled with other political and economic improvements.
While in Iraq last week, Defense Secretary Robert Gates talked about the importance of rebuilding neighborhoods and other Iraqi facilities more quickly in regions that had been cleared by troops and deemed secure.
Pentagon officials said Friday that any surge of forces into Iraq would be done by extending units currently there, moving units into Iraq earlier than planned, or shifting them from other locations around the world.
The most immediate and likely move would be to shift the 2nd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division from Kuwait - where it is expected to deploy early next month - into Iraq, said the officials, who requested anonymity because no decisions have been made.
That brigade is being sent to Kuwait to serve as the reserve force, and military commanders have routinely moved the reserve force into Iraq when needed. A typical brigade is about 3,500 soldiers, and moving them in would give an instant boost of troops.
Several officials said that military planners have been working on an array of options, but no one will know what units could be affected until the president decides how many troops he needs, and how quickly they have to be in Iraq.
Another popular option would be extending Marine units already in Iraq. Currently the 5th and 7th Regimental Combat Teams are serving in Western Iraq. Both are scheduled to move out early next year, but could be ordered to stay for a longer period of time. Each regimental team has about 7,000 marines.
The Army's 1st Brigade, 1st Armored Division is scheduled to come home early next year, and that Army unit has already been extended for about 45 days. It likely would not be extended again, the officials said.
Several other Army brigades are scheduled to deploy to Iraq for the normal rotation of units to the battlefront and some of those could be moved in more quickly if needed, although some were in Iraq less than a year ago. The Pentagon has tried not to send any units back before they have had a year home.
A surge in troops has been one of the options under discussion by the administration, but it would likely be coupled with other political and economic improvements.
While in Iraq last week, Defense Secretary Robert Gates talked about the importance of rebuilding neighborhoods and other Iraqi facilities more quickly in regions that had been cleared by troops and deemed secure.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines