Ethics committee launches investigation of Foley case

By Larry Margasak, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, October 05, 2006 | No comments posted.

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
WASHINGTON - The House Ethics Committee met today to investigate the unfolding scandal over Rep. Mark Foley's come-ons to congressional pages and accusations even by some Republicans that House speaker Dennis Hastert failed to protect the teens.

The committee, evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats, sat in closed session to take up a matter that imperils Hastert's leadership and has stirred extraordinary GOP infighting with midterm elections barely a month away.

Leaders of the ethics panel said they would speak publicly about the session in early afternoon.

Hastert asserted that any Republicans urging his ouster are playing into the hands of Democrats.

A fallen speaker “is exactly what our opponents would like to have happen,” Hastert said in an interview with the Chicago Tribune on the eve of the meeting.

Hastert said Democrats looking for advantage in the Nov. 7 midterm elections wish he would “fold my tent and others would fold our tent and they would sweep the House.”

An extraordinary political spectacle surrounded the committee's first meeting since Foley's resignation and the fallout that followed. Some leading Republicans publicly blamed Hastert for failing to take action after he was warned about the messages. And a former Foley aide said he told Republican leaders about the Florida congressman's conduct years earlier than they have acknowledged.

With Republicans concerned about maintaining their congressional majority in the elections, support for Hastert was ebbing. Republican officials said at least a few disgruntled members of the GOP rank and file had discussed whether to call on the speaker to step aside. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the issue.

Hastert himself apparently was torn over how to proceed. Although he repeatedly has said he would not step down, the Illinois Republican was reported to have told a conservative activist and critic that he might consider such a move to spare the party further problems.

Paul Weyrich quoted Hastert as telling him in a phone call Wednesday that “if he thought that resigning would be helpful to the Republicans maintaining the majority, he would do it,” Congressional Quarterly reported.

The Justice Department, meanwhile, ordered House officials to preserve all records related to Foley's electronic correspondence with teenagers. The request for record preservation is often followed by search warrants and subpoenas, and signal that investigators are moving closer to a criminal investigation.

Kirk Fordham, the former Foley aide, said in an interview with The Associated Press that more than three years ago he had “more than one conversation with senior staff at the highest level of the House of Representatives asking them to intervene.” He declined to identify them, but officials said Scott Palmer, Hastert's chief of staff, was one of them. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.

Palmer said through a spokesman, “What Kirk Fordham said did not happen.”

Fordham resigned Wednesday as chief of staff to Rep. Thomas Reynolds, R-N.Y., the House GOP campaign chief who says he alerted Hastert to concerns about Foley last spring.

Fordham disputed allegations that he covered up any misdeeds by Foley. “At no point ever did I ask anyone to block any inquiries,” said Fordham, who was Foley's longtime chief of staff until leaving in January 2004.

Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri, third-ranking GOP leader, pointedly told reporters he would have handled the Foley matter differently than Hastert, had he known of it.

“I think I could have given some good advice here, which is, you have to be curious, you have to ask all the questions you can think of,” Blunt said. “You absolutely can't decide not to look into activities because one individual's parents don't want you to.”

House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a radio interview Tuesday: “I believe I talked to the speaker and he told me it had been taken care of. My position is it's in his corner, it's his responsibility.”

Ron Bonjean, Hastert's spokesman, said the issue now rests with the Ethics Committee.

“We fully expect that the bipartisan panel will do what it needs to do to investigate this matter and protect the integrity of the House,” Bonjean said.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California said the committee should question Hastert and the rest of the Republican leadership under oath.

“The children, their parents, the public, and our colleagues deserve answers and those who covered up Mark Foley's behavior must be held accountable,” Pelosi said.

Foley, 52, resigned Friday after he was confronted with sexually explicit electronic messages he had sent teenage male pages. He has since entered an alcohol rehabilitation facility at an undisclosed location. Through his lawyer, he has said he is gay but denied any sexual contact with minors.

His abrupt departure and the ensuing sex scandal has shaken Republican confidence - and poll numbers - and plunged Hastert and others into an intensive effort to grapple with conflicting claims about what senior lawmakers knew, when they learned it and what they did about it.

The Ethics Committee had endured a partisan stalemate for 16 months that prevented its members from launching any new investigations. The committee broke the deadlock in May by announcing four separate investigations, including the first congressional probe of a lawmaker linked to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

No comments posted.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections