Court sides with employers in medical marijuana case
By William McCall, Associated Press Writer
Friday, May 05, 2006 |
PORTLAND - Workers who smoke marijuana at home for medical purposes risk losing their jobs unless they meet a strict definition on whether they are disabled, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a decision that supports employers with strict drug policies.
The court also said federal law trumps state law if there is any question about marijuana in the workplace.
The case was filed by a former millwright at the Columbia Forest Products Plant in Klamath Falls.
Robert Washburn had a doctor-approved, state-issued card allowing him to use marijuana to ease leg spasms that kept him awake at night.
But Columbia has a strict “zero tolerance” drug policy that required urine tests which showed Washburn had been using marijuana.
He requested a different test to determine whether he suffered any impairment from marijuana use at home. But negotiations broke down and Columbia fired him.
A trial court sided with the company, saying that Washburn was not disabled under Oregon law because prescription medicine offered him relief from the leg spasms.
But the Oregon Court of Appeals overturned the lower court, ruling the definition of disability had to be interpreted more broadly.
The Oregon Supreme Court rejected that reasoning, siding with the trial court.
A person must suffer from a “substantial limitation” to justify medical marijuana use, and loss of sleep from leg spasms simply did not rise to that level, the court said in an opinion by Chief Justice Paul De Muniz.
In a concurring opinion, Justice Rives Kistler added that federal law pre-empts any state employment discrimination law if it requires employers to accommodate medical marijuana use.
Kistler said the federal Controlled Substances Act prohibits manufacturing, distributing or possession of marijuana - even for medical use. And he noted the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law in a ruling on a recent California case, even though California, Oregon and nine other states have legalized medical marijuana.
The Oregon case had been cast as a showdown between workplace safety and worker medical needs.
Tags »
Embed This Article
Feel free to embed this article onto your website by copying the
code below and pasting it into your site's HTML.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines