Logging bill introduced by Smith

By Matthew Daly, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, November 22, 2005 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., said Monday he has introduced a bill aimed at improving federal response to damage caused by wildfire and other catastrophes. Smith’s bill builds on legislation introduced this month by Reps. Greg Walden, R-Ore., and Brian Baird, D-Wash.

Both are aimed at speeding projects to log dead timber and plant new trees after storms and wildfires — particularly in the wake of the 2002 Biscuit Fire in Oregon, where delayed logging has set off an ongoing controversy over what to do about dead and burned trees in national forests.

“Recent experiences in Oregon demonstrate that we need a new approach to restoring our forests from the ashes,” Smith said in a news release. “Black forests do not help fish, wildlife, water quality or recreation. To achieve these goals, we need to keep Oregon’s forests green.”

Environmentalists said the bill offers little improvement over the Walden-Baird measure — which they say would weaken public participation and oversight of logging following fires and other natural disturbances.

“It’s clear that the Forest Service has all the authority they need to do responsible fuel reduction” after a fire, said Sean Cosgrove, a forest policy specialist for the Sierra Club.

“They just need to have the direction from Congress to do that, and they need to place their money where it will do the most good — which is reducing fuels (such as small trees and underbrush) around communities,” Cosgrove said. “Trying to create new avenues for salvage logging large trees is just going to create more controversy and leave good projects undone.”

Smith said his bill, dubbed the Forests for Future Generations Act, would hasten the federal response to catastrophic events by requiring prompt evaluations of forest damage and providing quickened timelines for rehabilitation projects.

Smith’s bill also would encourage the timber industry and environmentalists to try to resolve disputes through mediation rather than court action that can cause years of delay.

Both bills incorporate guidance from the 2003 Healthy Forests Restoration Act, the landmark forestry bill that is intended to speed forest recovery projects.

“An emergency does not end when a fire is contained,” Smith said. “With bugs, disease and deterioration fighting against burnt trees, the emergency is not truly over until the land is healed and on its way to becoming a forest again.”

Chris West, vice president of the American Forest Resource Council, said his Portland-based group, which represents the timber industry, supports both bills.

“We support giving the federal agencies tools to expedite restoration and recovery of devastated forest ecosystems,” he said.

A public hearing on the Smith bill is likely to be scheduled early next year, his office said.

A hearing on the Walden-Baird bill is scheduled Dec. 7 before the House Agriculture Committee.
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Nick Reynolds wrote on Apr 25, 2008 7:01 PM:

Uh...ok!?
I personally think this is a great idea. As a fan of target shooting I sometimes try and find somewhere in the woods somewhere to shoot and it's hard to find a place where it will be safe. This will help eliminate shot up signs and busted glass in the woods and on the back trails. Let's hurry and make this happen!

sesshh wrote on Aug 5, 2007 9:05 AM:

This whole thing is just a Peliosi/Reid socialist machine cat fight with the president.They could care less about what is really needed(As usual).All they care about is another jab against thier enemy Bush.

(optional)
   

Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Editors Note | BlogThe World Forums

Most Popular


» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections