Democrats blast Smith for vote on drug prices

By Matthew Daly, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, November 08, 2005 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
WASHINGTON — Oregon Democrats are criticizing Republican Sen. Gordon Smith for voting against an effort by Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden to give the government power to negotiate Medicare drug prices directly with pharmaceutical companies.

Smith voted against the amendment last week as part of a budget-cutting package.

Wyden, who has been pushing for the Medicare provision since last year, criticized senators who opposed his amendment, saying they were “keeping us from doing the right thing for our seniors.”

The 2003 Medicare reform law — which takes effect in January — bars Medicare administrators from interfering with negotiations between Medicare recipients and hospitals, drug manufacturers, wholesalers or suppliers. Wyden voted for the law but has vowed to change it, starting with the plan to grant bargaining power for drug prices.

Wyden, who frequently works with Smith despite their partisan and philosophical difference, did not criticize his Oregon colleague.

But in a blistering speech on the Senate floor, he said opponents were making it harder to negotiate lower Medicare drug prices.

“What the federal government would be doing — unless the Congress steps in — is pretty much like somebody going to Costco and buying toilet paper one roll at a time,” Wyden said on the Senate floor. “The federal government isn’t using its bargaining power to hold down the costs of medicine. At a time when prescriptions are one of the fastest-growing forces in American health care, that just defies common sense.”

Wyden’s amendment, which he co-sponsored with Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, won 51 votes on Thursday, but was defeated because of a procedural rule requiring 60 votes for passage.

Spokesman Chris Matthews said Smith shared Wyden’s concerns about drug prices, but opposed the amendment because he was concerned it could have helped prevent the underlying bill from passing.

Smith, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, had helped negotiate the budget package, including protections for Medicaid recipients that Smith says could have been harmed by a plan originally proposed by GOP leaders.

The Senate bill is estimated to trim $36 billion, or 2 percent, from budget deficits forecast at $1.6 trillion over five years. Smith said Medicare and Medicaid savings in the bill would be squeezed from drug company and pharmacy profits and should have minimal effect on Oregon residents.

Matthews said Smith, a leading GOP moderate, “had committed (to Senate leaders) to basically supporting the (overall) bill without any major changes.”

Kelly Steele, a spokesman for Oregon Democrats, said Smith’s vote shows that he “continues to side with the big drug lobbyists that fund his special interest vacations — at the expense of lower prescription drug costs for all Oregonians.”
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

smiley 42 wrote on Oct 23, 2008 11:17 AM:

who cares

NB Resident wrote on Aug 4, 2008 6:48 PM:

Let's start replacing our good ole boys (ELECTED OFFICIALS) as well.

Craig wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:13 PM:

finally now this is good. what would be better is if we could vote someone from the working families party

Arrgy wrote on Jun 5, 2008 7:45 AM:

Replacing the corrupt with the corrupt. Oh goody! What a party!

Just An Observer wrote on Oct 24, 2006 3:42 PM:

ENRON was Bush's biggest campaign contributor in the 2000 election. It figures! Birds of a feather and all that...


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections